IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v388y2026ics0277953625010871.html

Consumer perceptions of electrocardiography-enabled smartwatches in health management

Author

Listed:
  • Clarysse, Martijn
  • Baert, Eline
  • Walrave, Michel
  • De Marez, Lieven
  • Ponnet, Koen

Abstract

Smartwatches with electrocardiography (ECG) functionality, capable of detecting cardiac arrhythmias, are promoted as accessible tools for early detection and prevention in cardiovascular healthcare. Despite their popularity, these devices have not been conclusively linked to improved long-term health outcomes – such as reduced stroke risk – in large scale randomized controlled trials. This raises the question whether popularity is driven by health concerns or by broader lifestyle and technological trends. This study combines factors from the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technologies (UTAUT2) with privacy concerns, innovativeness, health information accuracy and individual health orientations to model adoption intention of ECG-enabled smartwatches. Data from 753 respondents (38.5 % men, Mage = 34.33, SDage = 15.68), collected via online survey, were analyzed using multiple linear regression. Adoption intention was positively associated with performance expectancy (β = .205), habit (β = .192), personal innovativeness (β = .185), hedonic motivation (β = .169), wearable ownership (β = .143), social influence (β = .139), price value (β = .091), and age (β = .065). In contrast, privacy concerns, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, health information accuracy, and individual health orientations were not significant. Although perceiving smartwatches as useful for supporting health goals drives adoption intention, this intention is mainly driven by technology attitudes rather than by device-independent health orientations or data credibility perceptions. This finding underscores a key challenge for developers, healthcare professionals and academia to bridge the gap between technological promise and medical value and to promote a more evidence-based understanding of wearables’ role in healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarysse, Martijn & Baert, Eline & Walrave, Michel & De Marez, Lieven & Ponnet, Koen, 2026. "Consumer perceptions of electrocardiography-enabled smartwatches in health management," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:388:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625010871
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625010871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verena M. Wottrich & Eva A. van Reijmersdal & Edith G. Smit, 2019. "App Users Unwittingly in the Spotlight: A Model of Privacy Protection in Mobile Apps," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1056-1083, September.
    2. Tamara Dinev & Paul Hart, 2006. "An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    3. Man Lai Cheung & Ka Yin Chau & Michael Huen Sum Lam & Gary Tse & Ka Yan Ho & Stuart W. Flint & David R Broom & Ejoe Kar Ho Tso & Ka Yiu Lee, 2019. "Examining Consumers’ Adoption of Wearable Healthcare Technology: The Role of Health Attributes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Duarte, Paulo & Pinho, José Carlos, 2019. "A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 140-150.
    5. Lee, Sang Yup & Lee, Keeheon, 2018. "Factors that influence an individual's intention to adopt a wearable healthcare device: The case of a wearable fitness tracker," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 154-163.
    6. LingLi Song & BinXian Li & HaiBo Wu & CuiCui Wu & XueQi Zhang, 2024. "Understanding the factors of wearable devices among the patients with thyroid cancer: A modified UTAUT2 model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Singh, Nidhi & Misra, Richa & Singh, Sonali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Khorana, Sangeeta, 2022. "Assessing the factors that influence the adoption of healthcare wearables by the older population using an extended PMT model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Shih, Patti & Prokopovich, Kathleen & Degeling, Chris & Street, Jacqueline & Carter, Stacy M., 2022. "Direct-to-consumer detection of atrial fibrillation in a smartwatch electrocardiogram: Medical overuse, medicalisation and the experience of consumers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaxin Chen & Ting Li & Hua You & Jingyu Wang & Xueqing Peng & Baoyi Chen, 2023. "Behavioral Interpretation of Willingness to Use Wearable Health Devices in Community Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Xingyuan Wang & Yun Liu & Hongchen Liu, 2020. "Examining Users’ Adoption of Precision Medicine: The Moderating Role of Medical Technical Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Sefora Hailu Yoseph & Gao Chongyan, 2024. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Privacy Protection Behavior and Intention to Disclose Personal Information: Mediating Role of Personal Information Transparency," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 37(1), pages 96-118.
    4. Tran, Cong Duc & Nguyen, Tin Trung, 2021. "Health vs. privacy? The risk-risk tradeoff in using COVID-19 contact-tracing apps," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Piotrowski Dariusz, 2023. "Privacy frontiers in customers’ relations with banks," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 119-141, April.
    6. Joseph A. Cazier & Benjamin B. M. Shao & Robert D. St. Louis, 2007. "Sharing information and building trust through value congruence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 515-529, November.
    7. Hamid Reza Nikkhah & Frederic Schlackl & Rajiv Sabherwal, 2025. "Does Culture Affect Post-Adoption Privacy Concerns of Mobile Cloud Computing App Users? Insights from the US, the UK, and India," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 2059-2080, October.
    8. Potoglou, Dimitris & Palacios, Juan & Feijoo, Claudio & Gómez Barroso, Jose-Luis, 2015. "The supply of personal information: A study on the determinants of information provision in e-commerce scenarios," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127174, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Goethner, Maximilian & Hornuf, Lars & Regner, Tobias, 2021. "Protecting investors in equity crowdfunding: An empirical analysis of the small investor protection act," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Corey Angst, 2009. "Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 169-178, November.
    12. Xuanyi Bi & Yu Gao & Erhong Sun & Yan Yan & Yimin Zhou & Xuchun Ye, 2022. "Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public: A Latent Profile Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Lee, Cheng fang, 2022. "Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Mahajan, Advitya Indu & Taggar, Rashi & Gupta, Suruchi, 2025. "Augmented reality in E-Commerce: A dual value and barrier-based perspective on Gen Z's satisfaction and AR-Integrated shopping behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Hoon S. Choi & Darrell Carpenter & Myung S. Ko, 2022. "Risk Taking Behaviors Using Public Wi-Fi™," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 965-982, June.
    17. Cloarec, Julien, 2022. "Privacy controls as an information source to reduce data poisoning in artificial intelligence-powered personalization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 144-153.
    18. Jongwoo Kim & Richard L. Baskerville & Yi Ding, 2020. "Breaking the Privacy Kill Chain: Protecting Individual and Group Privacy Online," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 171-185, February.
    19. Degutis, Mindaugas & UrbonaviÄ ius, Sigitas & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Anselmsson, Johan, 2023. "Consumers’ willingness to disclose their personal data in e-commerce: A reciprocity-based social exchange perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Liu, Yu-li & Wu, Yanfei & Li, Changyan & Song, Chuling & Hsu, Wen-yi, 2024. "Does displaying one's IP location influence users' privacy behavior on social media? Evidence from China's Weibo," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:388:y:2026:i:c:s0277953625010871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.