IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p508-d1017927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public: A Latent Profile Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xuanyi Bi

    (Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yu Gao

    (Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Erhong Sun

    (Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Yan Yan

    (Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Yimin Zhou

    (Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xuchun Ye

    (Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Attitudes are deemed critical psychological variables that can determine end users’ acceptance and adoption of robots. This study explored the heterogeneity of the Chinese public’s attitudes toward robots in healthcare and examined demographic characteristics associated with the derived profile membership. The data were collected from a sample of 428 Chinese who participated in an online survey. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct subgroups regarding attitudes toward robots—optimistic (36.9%), neutral (47.2%), and ambivalent (15.9%). Interestingly, although participants in the ambivalent attitude profile held more negative attitudes toward interaction with or social influence of healthcare robots, their attitudes tended to be positive when it came to emotional interactions with healthcare robots. All the respondents reported negative attitudes toward the social influence of healthcare robots. Multivariable regression analysis results showed that there were significant differences in age, education level, monthly income, experience with computers, experience with wearable devices, and whether to follow robot-related news or not. This study confirmed the heterogeneity of the Chinese public’s attitudes toward robots in healthcare and highlighted the importance of emotional interaction with and social influence of healthcare robots, which might facilitate a better understanding of the needs and expectations of potential end users for robots in healthcare to make them more acceptable in different situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuanyi Bi & Yu Gao & Erhong Sun & Yan Yan & Yimin Zhou & Xuchun Ye, 2022. "Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public: A Latent Profile Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:508-:d:1017927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baptiste Isabet & Maribel Pino & Manon Lewis & Samuel Benveniste & Anne-Sophie Rigaud, 2021. "Social Telepresence Robots: A Narrative Review of Experiments Involving Older Adults before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Rocío Llamas-Ramos & Juan Luis Sánchez-González & Inés Llamas-Ramos, 2022. "Robotic Systems for the Physiotherapy Treatment of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    3. María Mar Lopez-Rodriguez & Alejandro Fernández-Millan & María Dolores Ruiz-Fernández & Iria Dobarrio-Sanz & Isabel María Fernández-Medina, 2020. "New Technologies to Improve Pain, Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents with Cancer: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Lee, Sang Yup & Lee, Keeheon, 2018. "Factors that influence an individual's intention to adopt a wearable healthcare device: The case of a wearable fitness tracker," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 154-163.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    3. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Brem, Alexander & Viardot, Eric & Nylund, Petra A., 2021. "Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Jiaxin Chen & Ting Li & Hua You & Jingyu Wang & Xueqing Peng & Baoyi Chen, 2023. "Behavioral Interpretation of Willingness to Use Wearable Health Devices in Community Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Vivian Welch & Elizabeth T. Ghogomu & Victoria I. Barbeau & Sierra Dowling & Rebecca Doyle & Ella Beveridge & Elisabeth Boulton & Payaam Desai & Jimmy Huang & Nour Elmestekawy & Tarannum Hussain & Arp, 2023. "Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    7. Bai, Xiao & Hu, Xiaoqian & Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K. & Vilela, André L.M. & Ghadimi, Pezhman & Yao, Cuiyou & Stanley, H. Eugene & Xu, Huji, 2022. "Most influential countries in the international medical device trade: Network-based analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    8. Nicola Döring & Melisa Conde & Karlheinz Brandenburg & Wolfgang Broll & Horst-Michael Gross & Stephan Werner & Alexander Raake, 2022. "Can Communication Technologies Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older People? A Scoping Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Chang, Victor & Doan, Le Minh Thao & Ariel Xu, Qianwen & Hall, Karl & Anna Wang, Yuanyuan & Mustafa Kamal, Muhammad, 2023. "Digitalization in omnichannel healthcare supply chain businesses: The role of smart wearable devices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Man Lai Cheung & Ka Yin Chau & Michael Huen Sum Lam & Gary Tse & Ka Yan Ho & Stuart W. Flint & David R Broom & Ejoe Kar Ho Tso & Ka Yiu Lee, 2019. "Examining Consumers’ Adoption of Wearable Healthcare Technology: The Role of Health Attributes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Chenming Peng & Hong Zhao & Sha Zhang, 2021. "Determinants and Cross-National Moderators of Wearable Health Tracker Adoption: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Shaygan, Amir & Daim, Tugrul, 2023. "Technology management maturity assessment model in healthcare research centers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Kokshagina, Dr Olga, 2021. "Managing shifts to value-based healthcare and value digitalization as a multi-level dynamic capability development process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Ramírez-Correa, Patricio & Grandón, Elizabeth E. & Rondán-Cataluña, F. Javier, 2020. "Users segmentation based on the Technological Readiness Adoption Index in emerging countries: The case of Chile," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Luisa Russo & Alberto Eugenio Tozzi & Angela Mastronuzzi & Ileana Croci & Francesco Gesualdo & Ilaria Campagna & Kiersten P. Miller & Italo Ciaralli & Matteo Amicucci & Domitilla Elena Secco & Vito An, 2022. "Feasibility of a VR Intervention to Decrease Anxiety in Children with Tumors Undergoing CVC Dressing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-8, September.
    16. Anna Seiterö & Kristin Thomas & Marie Löf & Ulrika Müssener, 2022. "Exploring the Black Box of an mHealth Intervention (LIFE4YOUth): A Qualitative Process and Outcome Evaluation of End-User Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Merdin-Uygur, Ezgi & Ozturkcan, Selcen, 2023. "Consumers and service robots: Power relationships amid COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Balta, Maria & Valsecchi, Raffaella & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Bourne, Dorota Joanna, 2021. "Digitalization and co-creation of healthcare value: A case study in Occupational Health," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Nnaji, Chukwuma & Awolusi, Ibukun, 2021. "Critical success factors influencing wearable sensing device implementation in AEC industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Chakraborty, Samyadip & Bhatt, Vaidik & Chakravorty, Tulika & Chakraborty, Kaustov, 2021. "Analysis of digital technologies as antecedent to care service transparency and orchestration," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:508-:d:1017927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.