IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v364y2025ics0277953624009833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond social determinants: Fiscal determinants of overdose death in U.S counties, 2017–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Lindenfeld, Zoe
  • Silver, Diana
  • Mauri, Amanda I.
  • Rothbart, Michah W.

Abstract

A large body of research has been dedicated to understanding the relationship between social determinants of health (SDOH) and overdose death across counties in the United States (U.S). However, this literature has so far focused on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of counties and has largely overlooked the ways in which county fiscal constraints may be associated with responses to the opioid epidemic. To address this gap, this longitudinal study uses data from the U.S Census of Governments to examine the associations between county governments’ revenues and expenditures, commonly used measures of SDOH, and overdose deaths in U.S counties from 2017 to 2020. We find that along with SDOH, higher per capita police spending, but not health expenditures, was associated with overdose deaths in U.S counties. Furthermore, we find that the link between police spending and overdose mortality depends on the amount of revenue generated through fines and forfeitures, suggesting it is a particular form of expenditures on policing – those linked to extractive practices– that is associated with overdose. This study heightens understanding on how the strategies counties undertake in generating and utilizing public resources impact overdose outcomes. Future studies should focus on measuring the causal impact of policies that significantly alter local revenue sources and expenditures on overdose deaths at the county level.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindenfeld, Zoe & Silver, Diana & Mauri, Amanda I. & Rothbart, Michah W., 2025. "Beyond social determinants: Fiscal determinants of overdose death in U.S counties, 2017–2020," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:364:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009833
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009833
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:364:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.