IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v314y2022ics0277953622007365.html

Stepping into the shoes of the policy maker: Results of a Participatory Value Evaluation for the Dutch long term COVID-19 strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Mouter, Niek
  • Jara, Karen Trujillo
  • Hernandez, Jose Ignacio
  • Kroesen, Maarten
  • de Vries, Martijn
  • Geijsen, Tom
  • Kroese, Floor
  • Uiters, Ellen
  • de Bruin, Marijn

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak early 2020 was followed by an unprecedented package of measures. The relative calmness of the pandemic early 2022 provides a momentum to prepare for various scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Mouter, Niek & Jara, Karen Trujillo & Hernandez, Jose Ignacio & Kroesen, Maarten & de Vries, Martijn & Geijsen, Tom & Kroese, Floor & Uiters, Ellen & de Bruin, Marijn, 2022. "Stepping into the shoes of the policy maker: Results of a Participatory Value Evaluation for the Dutch long term COVID-19 strategy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:314:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622007365
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622007365
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niek Mouter & Jose Ignacio Hernandez & Anatol Valerian Itten, 2021. "Public participation in crisis policymaking. How 30,000 Dutch citizens advised their government on relaxing COVID-19 lockdown measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-42, May.
    2. Anatol Itten & Niek Mouter, 2022. "When Digital Mass Participation Meets Citizen Deliberation: Combining Mini- and Maxi-Publics in Climate Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Katrine Bach Habersaat & Cornelia Betsch & Margie Danchin & Cass R. Sunstein & Robert Böhm & Armin Falk & Noel T. Brewer & Saad B. Omer & Martha Scherzer & Sunita Sah & Edward F. Fischer & Andrea E. S, 2020. "Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 677-687, July.
    4. Itten, Anatol & Mouter, Niek, 2022. "When digital mass participation meets citizen deliberation: Combining mini-publics and maxi-publics in climate policy-making," SocArXiv 6e9ct, Center for Open Science.
    5. Semra Ozdemir & Si Ning Germaine Tan & Isha Chaudhry & Chetna Malhotra & Eric Andrew Finkelstein, 2021. "Public Preferences for Government Response Policies on Outbreak Control," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(3), pages 347-358, May.
    6. Richard Carson & Theodore Groves, 2007. "Incentive and informational properties of preference questions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 181-210, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jose Ignacio Hernandez & Sander Cranenburgh & Marijn Bruin & Marijn Stok & Niek Mouter, 2025. "Using XGBoost and SHAP to explain citizens’ differences in policy support for reimposing COVID-19 measures in the Netherlands," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 381-409, February.
    2. Jara, Karen Trujillo & Hernandez, Jose Ignacio & Mouter, Niek & Brouwer, Werner & van Exel, Job, 2025. "Preferences of citizens in Peru for school opening during a public-health crisis: A participatory value evaluation study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    3. Boxebeld, Sander & Geijsen, Tom & Tuit, Charlotte & Exel, Job van & Makady, Amr & Maes, Laurence & van Agthoven, Michel & Mouter, Niek, 2024. "Public preferences for the allocation of societal resources over different healthcare purposes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Vries, M.O. & Mouter, N. & Metze, T.A.P. & Spruit, S., 2026. "Who is listening? Comparing 7 cases of citizen participation at different levels of government in the Dutch energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PB).
    2. Jara, Karen Trujillo & Hernandez, Jose Ignacio & Mouter, Niek & Brouwer, Werner & van Exel, Job, 2025. "Preferences of citizens in Peru for school opening during a public-health crisis: A participatory value evaluation study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    3. Bekius, Femke & van der Waerden, Jaap & de Vries, Gerdien & van der Heijden, Rob & Janssen, Josefa, 2025. "A review of case study-based academic literature on public participation in sustainable mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 682-694.
    4. Niek Mouter & Tom Geijsen & Aylin Munyasya & Jose Ignacio Hernandez & Daniel Korthals & Marijn Stok & Ellen Uiters & Marijn Bruin, 2025. "Preferences for the Societal Impacts of a Pandemic when it Transitions into an Endemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 18(1), pages 49-63, January.
    5. Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J. & Geigenmüller, Iris M. & Mouter, Niek & van Lierop, Dea S. & Ettema, Dick F., 2024. "How do I want the city council to spend our budget? Conceiving MaaS from a citizen's perspective … (as well as biking infrastructure and public transport)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 96-104.
    6. Joshua C. Yang & Fynn Bachmann, 2025. "Bridging Voting and Deliberation with Algorithms: Field Insights from vTaiwan and Kultur Komitee," Papers 2502.05017, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    7. de Ruijter, Annamarie & Tuit, Charlotte & Mouter, Niek, 2025. "Beyond face Validity: Assessment of a participatory value evaluation for an institutionalized transport conflict," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 114-127.
    8. José Duarte Ribeiro & Roberto Falanga & João Moniz, 2025. "Assessing the Role of Democratic Innovations in Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7775-7790, October.
    9. Shr, Yau-Huo (Jimmy) & Zhang, Wendong, 2024. "Omitted downstream attributes and the benefits of nutrient reductions: Implications for choice experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Palma, Marco A. & Ness, Meghan L. & Anderson, David P., 2015. "Buying More than Taste? A Latent Class Analysis of Health and Prestige Determinants of Healthy Food," 2015 Conference (59th), February 10-13, 2015, Rotorua, New Zealand 202566, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Henrik Andersson & Olivier Beaumais & Romain Crastes dit Sourd & Stephane Hess & François-Charles Wolf, 2017. "Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657recent published articles in journals relatedto agriculture, environment, or health," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 98(3), pages 201-220.
    13. Frondel Manuel & Kutzschbauch Ole & Sommer Stephan & Traub Stefan, 2017. "Die Gerechtigkeitslücke in der Verteilung der Kosten der Energiewende auf die privaten Haushalte," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 335-347, November.
    14. Wiktor Adamowicz & Mark Dickie & Shelby Gerking & Marcella Veronesi & David Zinner, 2014. "Household Decision Making and Valuation of Environmental Health Risks to Parents and Their Children," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(4), pages 481-519.
    15. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Sandorf, Erlend Dancke & Sobhani, Anae & Szép, Teodóra, 2021. "Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 28-44.
    16. John A. List & Robert P. Berrens & Alok K. Bohara & Joe Kerkvliet, 2004. "Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(3), pages 741-752, June.
    17. Patricia Champ & Richard Bishop, 2001. "Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 19(4), pages 383-402, August.
    18. Daniel Rondeau & Christian A. Vossler, 2024. "Incentive compatibility and respondent beliefs: Consequentiality and game form," Working Papers 2024-02, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    19. Nguyen, Thanh Cong & Le, Hoa Thu & Nguyen, Hang Dieu & Ngo, Mai Thanh & Nguyen, Hong Quang, 2021. "Examining ordering effects and strategic behaviour in a discrete choice experiment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 394-413.
    20. Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F. Shogren & Verity Watson, 2019. "Discrete Choice under Oaths," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 19007, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:314:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622007365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.