IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v76y2025ics0275531925000844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can cryptocurrencies improve portfolio diversification? Evidence from the prospect risk perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhan
  • Gao, Xiang
  • Gu, Jiahao

Abstract

This paper develops a quantitative approach to measure the security’ risk that corresponds to investors’ prospect behaviors. From the investor’s utility maximization condition, this paper demonstrates that a prospect investor should minimize his/her exposure to prospect risk by reducing the probability of loss while maximizing loss dispersion if he/she faces loss. Importantly, in token markets, investors exhibit more behavioral bias because they expect significant positive returns while grappling with extreme tail risk, and thus prospect risk management is more useful. The empirical analysis of this paper suggests that cryptocurrencies investors with prospect risk attitudes tend to seek risk when facing a moderate loss probability level, and they would give up at most 150 bps each month to pursue higher volatility. Based on this return predictability, token investors could develop portfolio strategies by ranking token and equity assets according to their probability of loss and loss dispersion and generate superior subsequent returns; appropriate combination of equity and bitcoin could generate Sharpe ratio around 0.4 based on prospect investment strategies, which is much higher than Sharpe ratio of pure market index or pure bitcoin investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhan & Gao, Xiang & Gu, Jiahao, 2025. "Can cryptocurrencies improve portfolio diversification? Evidence from the prospect risk perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925000844
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925000844
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925000844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.