IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v102y2025ics1059056025005155.html

The spatial spillover effect of digital economy on regional tax Revenue: An empirical study based on the decay boundary and spillover path

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yanlong
  • Lian, Xu

Abstract

Using Chinese provincial panel data from 2012 to 2022 and constructing a Spatial Durbin Model for empirical analysis, the development of the digital economy not only effectively promotes the growth of local tax revenues but also generates positive spatial spillover effects on tax revenues in neighboring regions. Further analysis reveals that the spatial spillover effects exhibit the characteristic of gradually attenuating as geographical distance continuously increases, and when the geographical distance exceeds 500 km, the spillover effects cease to be significant. Path analysis indicates that the development of the technology market and foreign capital inflow were the main pathways through which the digital economy achieves spatial spillover. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotional effect of the digital economy on regional tax revenues exhibits distinct heterogeneous characteristics across three dimensions: innovation capacity, tax types, and policy timing.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yanlong & Lian, Xu, 2025. "The spatial spillover effect of digital economy on regional tax Revenue: An empirical study based on the decay boundary and spillover path," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025005155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Zheng & Yu Xiang & Xunhua Tu, 2023. "Digital economy, spatial spillover and carbon intensity: concurrently on the threshold effect of human capital," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 2178022-217, December.
    2. Holger Görg & Eric Strobl, 2016. "Spillovers from Foreign Firms through Worker Mobility: An Empirical Investigation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT, chapter 13, pages 243-259, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Haixiang Xiao & Jiayi Liu, 2022. "The impact of digital economy development on local fiscal revenue efficiency," Economic Analysis Letters, Anser Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, December.
    4. David B. Audretsch, 2003. "Innovation And Spatial Externalities," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 167-174, April.
    5. Shuaitao Jiao & Qiubi Sun, 2021. "Digital Economic Development and Its Impact on Econimic Growth in China: Research Based on the Prespective of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Keller, Wolfgang, 2010. "International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Spillovers," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 793-829, Elsevier.
    7. repec:bba:eallet:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mei Shang & Shaopeng Zhang & Qing Yang, 2024. "The Spatial Role and Influencing Mechanism of the Digital Economy in Empowering High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Yujie Shang & Hyukku Lee & Jinghao Ma, 2025. "A Study on the Spatial Effects of the Digital Economy on Regional Economic Growth in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1996. "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 630-640, June.
    11. J. Paul Elhorst & Ioanna Tziolas & Chang Tan & Petros Milionis, 2024. "The distance decay effect and spatial reach of spillovers," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 265-289, April.
    12. Adelheid Holl & Bettina Peters & Christian Rammer, 2023. "Local knowledge spillovers and innovation persistence of firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 826-850, August.
    13. Julia Varlamova & Ekaterina Kadochnikova, 2023. "Modeling the Spatial Effects of Digital Data Economy on Regional Economic Growth: SAR, SEM and SAC Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-31, August.
    14. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    15. Jinxin Bian & Decai Tang & Yan Fang, 2025. "The Dual Impact and Spatial Spillover Effects of the Digital Economy on Urban–Rural Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-39, January.
    16. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Candelo, Elena & Couturier, Jerome, 2021. "Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 100-111.
    17. Erik van der Marel, 2021. "Digital‐based Services Globalization and Multilateral Trade Cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 392-398, May.
    18. Nicoletti, Giuseppe & von Rueden, Christina & Andrews, Dan, 2020. "Digital technology diffusion: A matter of capabilities, incentives or both?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    19. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    20. Wolfgang Keller, 2002. "Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 120-142, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Joan Crespo & Miguel Ángel Márquez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2026. "Population–employment dynamics in the European Union: Does innovation lead or follow?," Working Papers 2026/08, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    2. Haasnoot, Cornelis W. & de Vaal, Albert, 2022. "Heterogeneous firms and cluster externalities: how asymmetric effects at the firm level affect cluster productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    3. Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Joan Crespo & Miguel A. Márquez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2026. "Population–employment dynamics in the European Union: Does innovation lead or follow?," Working Papers 2605, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    4. Rakas, Marija & Hain, Daniel S., 2019. "The state of innovation system research: What happens beneath the surface?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    5. Ning, Lutao & Wang, Fan & Li, Jian, 2016. "Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 830-843.
    6. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Marco Di Cataldo, 2015. "Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 673-706.
    7. Pranpreya Sriwannawit & Ulf Sandström, 2015. "Large-scale bibliometric review of diffusion research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1615-1645, February.
    8. Dahlke, Johannes & Beck, Mathias & Kinne, Jan & Lenz, David & Dehghan, Robert & Wörter, Martin & Ebersberger, Bernd, 2024. "Epidemic effects in the diffusion of emerging digital technologies: evidence from artificial intelligence adoption," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    9. Crespi, Gustavo & Figal Garone, Lucas & Maffioli, Alessandro & Stein, Ernesto, 2020. "Public support to R&D, productivity, and spillover effects: Firm-level evidence from Chile," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Christos Kolympiris & Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes, 2013. "Geographic scope of proximity effects among small life sciences firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1059-1086, May.
    11. Qin, Xionghe & Wang, Xueli & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2023. "The contrasting effects of interregional networks and local agglomeration on R&D productivity in Chinese provinces: Insights from an empirical spatial Durbin model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Fadly, Dalia & Fontes, Francisco, 2019. "Geographical proximity and renewable energy diffusion: An empirical approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 422-435.
    13. Christian Rammer & Jan Kinne & Knut Blind, 2020. "Knowledge proximity and firm innovation: A microgeographic analysis for Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 996-1014, April.
    14. Guan, Jian Cheng & Yan, Yan, 2016. "Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy field," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1460-1473.
    15. Steven Bond-Smith & Philip McCann & Les Oxley, 2018. "A regional model of endogenous growth without scale assumptions," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 5-35, January.
    16. Jonas Heiberg & Bernhard Truffer, 2021. "The emergence of a global innovation system – a case study from the water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(09), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    17. Alexander Cordes & Ulrich Schasse, 2015. "The firm's evaluation of local research institutes and universities - an empirical analysis for Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa15p933, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Lorenzo Cassi & Anne Plunket, 2014. "Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 395-422, September.
    19. Muhamed Kudic & Wilfried Ehrenfeld & Toralf Pusch, 2015. "On the trail of core–periphery patterns in innovation networks: measurements and new empirical findings from the German laser industry," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(1), pages 187-220, October.
    20. Zaizhou Hu & Zengdong Cao & Anran Du & Qin Tu, 2025. "Where does it matter? Revisiting the role of proximity in knowledge spillovers," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(2), pages 297-322, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025005155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.