IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v61y2017icp15-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MiF3 method: Modeling intermodal fluidity freight flows

Author

Listed:
  • Cedillo-Campos, Miguel Gastón
  • Lizarraga-Lizarraga, Giovanni
  • Martner-Peyrelongue, Carlos Daniel

Abstract

Modern industrial systems have developed advanced supply systems going from just-in-time to just-in-sequence deliveries based on intermodal freight transport solutions. However, the increase of product variety, and multiple interfaces needed to deliver products have exposed them to vulnerability of variability. Thus, information on how fluid an intermodal freight transport solution is, becomes critical to private decision makers for knowing if supply chains are achieving their goals. Additionally, it is significant to public decision makers in determining if and where enhancements in infrastructure and/or in policy and regulations might improve economic development. Therefore, as a result of detailed analysis of the processes involved from a systems approach, this paper contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing a mathematical framework to model and forecast supply chain fluidity when using any intermodal freight transport combination. Its spatial and temporal flexibility lets expand the analysis to handle a wide range of intermodal paths. The proposed method contributes to demonstrate the key connection between improvements in supply chain performance and enhanced economic development. As a conclusion key issues for improving fluidity of intermodal freight flows are discussed, and future research is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Cedillo-Campos, Miguel Gastón & Lizarraga-Lizarraga, Giovanni & Martner-Peyrelongue, Carlos Daniel, 2017. "MiF3 method: Modeling intermodal fluidity freight flows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 15-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:15-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2017.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073988591530055X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu, 2013. "Multi-stage LTL transport systems in supply chain management," Post-Print halshs-00796714, HAL.
    2. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00796714 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Köhler, Holger & Thomas, David, 2010. "State of the art in supply chain risk management research. Empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 41981, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Dullaert, Wout & Zamparini, Luca, 2013. "The impact of lead time reliability in freight transport: A logistics assessment of transport economics findings," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 190-200.
    5. Thun, Jörn-Henrik & Hoenig, Daniel, 2011. "An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 242-249, May.
    6. Bueno-Solano, Alfredo & Cedillo-Campos, Miguel Gastón, 2014. "Dynamic impact on global supply chains performance of disruptions propagation produced by terrorist acts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Vilko, Jyri P.P. & Hallikas, Jukka M., 2012. "Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 586-595.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ngui Min Fui Tom, 2019. "Strategy to Build a Transshipment Port as a Catalyst to Achieving Critical Mass for Sabah’s Economic Growth," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 141-166, July.
    2. Cedillo-Campos, Miguel Gastón & Pérez-González, Carlos Mario & Piña-Barcena, Jared & Moreno-Quintero, Eric, 2019. "Measurement of travel time reliability of road transportation using GPS data: A freight fluidity approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 240-288.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.
    2. Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2012. "Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 35-54.
    3. Aqlan, Faisal & Lam, Sarah S., 2015. "A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 54-63.
    4. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    5. Efrah Wozir Abdulahi & Luo Fan, 2021. "Exploring and Validating Container Operational Risk Scale in Container Shipping: The Case of Ethiopian Shipping and Logistics Service Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Bueno-Solano, Alfredo & Cedillo-Campos, Miguel Gastón, 2014. "Dynamic impact on global supply chains performance of disruptions propagation produced by terrorist acts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    8. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    9. Bodendorf, Frank & Sauter, Maximilian & Franke, Jörg, 2023. "A mixed methods approach to analyze and predict supply disruptions by combining causal inference and deep learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Sreedevi, R. & Saranga, Haritha, 2017. "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 332-342.
    11. Tianjian Yang & Weiguo Fan, 2016. "Information management strategies and supply chain performance under demand disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 8-27, January.
    12. Xueni Gou & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2019. "Risk analysis of marine cargoes and major port disruptions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(4), pages 497-523, December.
    13. Basu R, Jothi & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Yuvaraj, M., 2023. "Improving agility and resilience of automotive spares supply chain: The additive manufacturing enabled truck model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Hasani, Aliakbar & Khosrojerdi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-52.
    15. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    16. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    17. Raka, Chatchai & Liangrokapart, Jirapan, 2015. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Case Study in Thailand," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 557-580, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. Silvia Carpitella & Ilyas Mzougui & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2022. "Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 769-785, September.
    19. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    20. Ennouri Wissem, 2013. "Risks Management: New Literature Review," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 8(1), pages 288-297, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:15-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.