IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v108y2024ics0739885924000842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paratransit services and efficiency: The potential of utilizing idle taxis in a strained welfare market

Author

Listed:
  • Hashimoto, Yuki

Abstract

With population aging, demand for paratransit services has increased, leading to higher operating subsidies. This study uses Japan as a case study to examine the substitutive relationship between subsidized noncommercial wheelchair-accessible vehicles (WAVs), primarily owned by elderly care facilities, and taxis, highlighting inefficiencies in the open-entry paratransit market. Using nationwide panel data, we find that a 10% increase in WAVs results in a 1.7% decrease in taxi revenue, reducing taxi drivers' income by approximately 5%. This effect is more pronounced in regions with higher aging rates and welfare spending. We suggest utilizing vacant taxis for paratransit services to enhance market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Hashimoto, Yuki, 2024. "Paratransit services and efficiency: The potential of utilizing idle taxis in a strained welfare market," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:108:y:2024:i:c:s0739885924000842
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000842
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian W. H. Parry & Kenneth A. Small, 2009. "Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 700-724, June.
    2. Gonzales, Eric J., 2016. "Demand responsive transit systems with time-dependent demand: User equilibrium, system optimum, and management strategyAuthor-Name: Amirgholy, Mahyar," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 234-252.
    3. Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee, 2022. "Quantifying the consumer’s dependence on different information sources on acceptance of autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 179-203.
    4. Rahimi, Mahour & Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gonzales, Eric J., 2018. "System modeling of demand responsive transportation services: Evaluating cost efficiency of service and coordinated taxi usage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 66-83.
    5. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:z9a4h_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Kawaguchi, Akira & Mizuno, Keizo, 2011. "Deregulation and labour earnings: Three motor carrier industries in Japan," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 441-452, August.
    8. Young, Mischa & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Using Wait-time Thresholds to Improve Mobility: The Case of UberWAV Services in Toronto," OSF Preprints z9a4h, Center for Open Science.
    9. Thomas G ALTURA & Yuki HASHIMOTO & Sanford M JACOBY & Kaoru KANAI & Kazuro SAGUCHI, 2021. "Japan Meets the Sharing Economy: Contending Frames," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 137-161.
    10. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    11. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2018. "Demand imbalances and multi-period public transport supply," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 106-126.
    12. Hansson, Lisa & Holmgren, Johan, 2018. "Cost effect of reorganising – A study of special transport services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 453-459.
    13. Nelson, John D. & Wright, Steve & Masson, Brian & Ambrosino, Giorgio & Naniopoulos, Aristotelis, 2010. "Recent developments in Flexible Transport Services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 243-248.
    14. Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2018. "Shared Mobility: The Potential of Ride Hailing and Pooling," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt46p6n2sk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Gupta, Diwakar & Chen, Hao-Wei & Miller, Lisa A. & Surya, Fajarrani, 2010. "Improving the efficiency of demand-responsive paratransit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 201-217, May.
    16. Deakin, Elizabeth SM., J.D. & Halpern, Jeremy & Parker, Madeleine, 2020. "Examining the Potential for Uber and Lyft to be Included in Subsidized Mobility Programs Targeted to Seniors, Low Income Adults, and People with Disabilities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0mw7h24f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hörcher, Daniel & De Borger, Bruno & Graham, Daniel J., 2023. "Subsidised transport services in a fiscal federation: Why local governments may be against decentralised service provision," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    2. Yuki HASHIMOTO & Kazutomo KOMAE, 2021. "Paratransit Services for Efficiency: Examining the Potential for Taxis to be Included in Subsidized Market," Discussion papers 21074, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    4. Xuto, Praj & Anderson, Richard J. & Graham, Daniel J. & Hörcher, Daniel, 2023. "Sustainable urban rail funding: Insights from a century-long global dataset," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 100-115.
    5. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Ramezani, Mohsen, 2020. "Ride-Sourcing modeling and pricing in non-equilibrium two-sided markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 340-357.
    6. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2020. "MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    7. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Xuto, Praj & Anderson, Richard J. & Graham, Daniel J. & Hörcher, Daniel, 2021. "Optimal infrastructure reinvestment in urban rail systems: A dynamic supply optimisation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 251-268.
    9. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Fielbaum, Andrés & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Strategies for transit fleet design considering peak and off-peak periods using the single-line model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-18.
    10. Ho, Chinh Q. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 161-176.
    11. Svanberg , Lisa & Pyddoke, Roger, 2020. "Policies for on-board crowding in public transportation : a literature review," Working Papers 2020:6, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    12. Hannes Wallimann & Kevin Blattler & Widar von Arx, 2021. "Do price reductions attract customers in urban public transport? A synthetic control approach," Papers 2111.14613, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    13. Coulombel, Nicolas & Monchambert, Guillaume, 2023. "Diseconomies of scale and subsidies in urban public transportation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Andres Fielbaum & Alejandro Tirachini & Javier Alonso-Mora, 2021. "New sources of economies and diseconomies of scale in on-demand ridepooling systems and comparison with public transport," Papers 2106.15270, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    15. Wang, Bangjuan & Liu, Chengliang & Zhang, Hong, 2022. "Where are equity and service effectiveness? A tale from public transport in Shanghai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Daniel Hörcher & Ramandeep Singh & Daniel J. Graham, 2022. "Social distancing in public transport: mobilising new technologies for demand management under the Covid-19 crisis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 735-764, April.
    17. Giagnorio, Mirko & Börjesson, Maria & D'Alfonso, Tiziana, 2024. "Introducing electric buses in urban areas: Effects on welfare, pricing, frequency, and public subsidies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Wallimann, Hannes & Blättler, Kevin & von Arx, Widar, 2023. "Do price reductions attract customers in urban public transport? A synthetic control approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Guzman, Luis A. & Hessel, Philipp, 2022. "The effects of public transport subsidies for lower-income users on public transport use: A quasi-experimental study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 215-224.
    20. Guzman, Luis A. & Cardona, Santiago Gómez & Ochoa, Jorge Luis, 2024. "Increased ridership and improved affordability: Transforming public transport subsidies in developing contexts," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Paratransit; Taxi; Transportation policy; Elder care policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:108:y:2024:i:c:s0739885924000842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.