IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i1s0048733324001896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how?

Author

Listed:
  • Ferré, Marie
  • Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
  • Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti
  • Ramírez-Gómez, María-Margarita
  • Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia
  • Agudelo-Chocontá, Beatriz-Elena
  • Marques, Daniela Vieira
  • Flores, Roberto Manolio Valladão
  • Rodríguez-Borray, Gonzalo-Alfredo
  • de Souza, Mirian Oliveira
  • Goulet, Frédéric
  • Vásquez-Urriago, Ángela-Rocío
  • Sánchez-Lozano, Juliana-Ivonne
  • Pinto, Daniela Maciel
  • Zambrano-Moreno, Gregorio-Salomón
  • Londoño-Arias, María-Aidé
  • Zapata-Tamayo, Cristóbal-Alfonso
  • de Romémont, Aurelle

Abstract

Research organisations experience increasing demands to analyse on the multidimensional societal impacts of their activities. This leads to more reflections about the integration of organisational strategies devoted to research evaluation and impact monitoring, in order to answer societal and funder's demands, improve research practices, and make research and innovations more transformative to society. Establishing a “culture of impact” within an organisation is driven by multiple factors and translates into a variety of changes at different organisational levels. We aim to understand what motivates agricultural research organisations to develop a culture of impact, and the consequences of this culture on research, management, and collaboration practices. For this, we analyse organisational trajectories of three research organisations: the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (Cirad), the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), and the Colombian Agricultural Research Corporation (AGROSAVIA). Through a cross-analysis of these cases along the reasons to integrate impact evaluation in strategic agendas, the materialisation of a culture of impact in practice, and what it entails in terms of cognitive and practical changes within their respective staff and management structures, we highlight drivers and patterns of development of a culture of impact, and circumstances that seem to either favour or hinder its emergence. This study is unique for examining various types of changes that a culture of impact can generate among individuals, in particular. It offers valuable material to enable re-interrogate and orient a research organisation's culture of impact's path in accordance with organisational values, priorities, and opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferré, Marie & Blundo-Canto, Genowefa & Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti & Ramírez-Gómez, María-Margarita & Vedovoto, Graciela Luzia & Agudelo-Chocontá, Beatriz-Elena & Marques, Daniela Vieira & Flores, R, 2025. "Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:1:s0048733324001896
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001896
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Bernard Triomphe & Guy Faure & Danielle Barret & Aurelle de Romemont & Etienne Hainzelin, 2019. "Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: Process and reflective learning," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 136-144.
    2. Guy Faure & Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Agathe Devaux-Spatarakis & Jean Louis Le Guerroué & Syndhia Mathé & Ludovic Temple & Aurélie Toillier & Bernard Triomphe & Etienne Hainzelin, 2020. "A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 158-170.
    3. Ricardo Chiva & Joaquin Alegre & Rafael Lapiedra, 2007. "Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 224 - 242, April.
    4. Ricardo Chiva & Joaquin Alegre & Rafael Lapiedra, 2007. "Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 224-242, June.
    5. Kristiaan P. W. Kok & Alanya C. L. den Boer & Tomris Cesuroglu & Marjoleine G. van der Meij & Renée de Wildt-Liesveld & Barbara J. Regeer & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, 2019. "Transforming Research and Innovation for Sustainable Food Systems—A Coupled-Systems Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Mayne, John, 2008. "Building an evaluative culture for effective evaluation and results management," ILAC Briefs 52530, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative.
    7. Pierre Benoit Joly & Laurence Colinet & Ariane Gaunand & Stephane Lemarié & Mireille Matt, 2016. "Agricultural research impact assessment: issues, methods and challenges," Working Papers hal-01431457, HAL.
    8. Pierre-Benoit Joly & Mireille Matt, 2022. "Towards a new generation of research impact assessment approaches," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 621-631, June.
    9. Ricardo Chiva & Joaquin Alegre & Rafael Lapiedra, 2007. "Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 224-242, June.
    10. Peter Weißhuhn & Katharina Helming & Johanna Ferretti, 2018. "Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 36-42.
    11. Bozeman, Barry & Youtie, Jan, 2017. "Socio-economic impacts and public value of government-funded research: Lessons from four US National Science Foundation initiatives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1387-1398.
    12. Ludovic Temple & Danielle Barret & Genowefa Blundo Canto & Marie-Hélène Dabat & Agathe Devaux-Spatarakis & Guy Faure & Etienne Hainzelin & Syndhia Mathé & Aurelie Toillier & Bernard Triomphe, 2018. "Assessing impacts of agricultural research for development: A systemic model focusing on outcomes," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 157-170.
    13. Faure, Guy & Barret, Danielle & Blundo-Canto, Genowefa & Dabat, Marie-Hélène & Devaux-Spatarakis, Agathe & Le Guerroué, Jean Louis & Marquié, Catherine & Mathé, Syndhia & Temple, Ludovic & Toillier, A, 2018. "How different agricultural research models contribute to impacts: Evidence from 13 case studies in developing countries," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 128-136.
    14. Mayne, John, 2008. "Building an evaluative culture for effective evaluation and results management," ILAC Working Papers 52535, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative.
    15. Edgar H. Schein, 1990. "Organizational Culture: What it is and How to Change it," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Paul Evans & Yves Doz & André Laurent (ed.), Human Resource Management in International Firms, chapter 0, pages 56-82, Palgrave Macmillan.
    16. Maru, Yiheyis & Sparrow, Ashley & Stirzaker, Richard & Davies, Jocelyn, 2018. "Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) from a theory of change perspective," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 310-320.
    17. Etienne Hainzelin & Danielle Barret & Guy Faure & Marie Hélène Dabat & Bernard Triomphe, 2017. "Agricultural research in the Global South: steering research beyond impact promises [Investigación agrícola en los países del Sur: ir más allá de una promesa de impacto para pilotar la investigació," Post-Print hal-01545869, HAL.
    18. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    19. Turner, James A & Guesmi, Bouali & Gil, José M. & Heanue, Kevin & Sierra, Miguel & Percy, Helen & Bortagaray, Isabel & Chams, Nour & Milne, Cath, 2022. "Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Alamgir Mollah & Jae-Hyeok Choi & Su-Jung Hwang & Jin-Kyo Shin, 2023. "Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Organizational Performance of South Korea in the Digital Age: The Effect of Digital Leadership on IT Capabilities and Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Bernard Triomphe & Guy Faure & Danielle Barret & Aurelle de Romemont & Etienne Hainzelin, 2019. "Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: Process and reflective learning," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 136-144.
    3. Gomes, Giancarlo & Seman, Laio Oriel & De Montreuil Carmona, Linda Jessica, 2022. "Industry does matter: Analysing innovation, firm performance and organisational learning heterogeneities on Brazilian manufacturing sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 544-555.
    4. Paget, Nicolas & Le Gal, Pierre-Yves & Goulet, Frédéric, 2024. "Motivations and challenges of intrapreneurship in research organizations. The case of decision support systems in agricultural research for development," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Safwat Adel El-Sharkawy & Muhammad Salah Nafea & Emad El-Din H. Hassan, 2023. "HRM and organizational learning in knowledge economy: investigating the impact of happiness at work (HAW) on organizational learning capability (OLC)," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Carlos Devece & Daniel Palacios-Marqués & D. Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano, 2021. "IT-based strategy, capabilities, and practices: crowdsourcing implementation in market-oriented firms," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 15-32, January.
    7. Pruksapong, Mutarika, 2008. "Organizational Member Learning and the Influential Factors: The Empirical Study of Thailand," MPRA Paper 10946, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Pietro De Marinis & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Guido Sali & Giulio Senes, 2022. "The Rapid and Participatory Assessment of Land Suitability in Development Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Rossing, Walter A.H. & Albicette, Maria Marta & Aguerre, Veronica & Leoni, Carolina & Ruggia, Andrea & Dogliotti, Santiago, 2021. "Crafting actionable knowledge on ecological intensification: Lessons from co-innovation approaches in Uruguay and Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Turner, James A & Guesmi, Bouali & Gil, José M. & Heanue, Kevin & Sierra, Miguel & Percy, Helen & Bortagaray, Isabel & Chams, Nour & Milne, Cath, 2022. "Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Mohammad Hossein Khasmafkan Nezam & Ali Attafar & Ali Nasr Isfahani & Arsh Shahin, 2013. "Human Capital and New Product Development Performance Efficiency- The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(6), pages 79-87, December.
    13. Ekene Okwechime & Peter Duncan & David Edgar, 2018. "Big data and smart cities: a public sector organizational learning perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 601-625, August.
    14. Altaf Hussain & Muhammad Khan & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Zokir Toshtemirovich Mamadiyarov & Mohichexra Turobjonovna Kurbonbekova & Muxlisa Qodirjon Kizi Mahmudova, 2023. "Nexus of Training and Development, Organizational Learning Capability, and Organizational Performance in the Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Alessandro Magrini & Fabio Bartolini & Alessandra Coli & Barbara Pacini, 2019. "A structural equation model to assess the impact of agricultural research expenditure on multiple dimensions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 2063-2080, July.
    16. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2021. "How does the use of information technologies affect the adoption of environmental practices in SMEs? A mixed-methods approach," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-102, January.
    17. Esteban Lafuente & Yancy Vaillant & Juan Carlos Leiva, 2018. "Sustainable and Traditional Product Innovation without Scale and Experience, but Only for KIBS!," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Nofal Razan Jamil & Bader Obeidat, 2019. "Reviewing the Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability on the Effect of Transformational Leadership on Entrepreneurial Orientation," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 7(2), pages 111-136, April.
    19. Bambang Bernanthos, 2018. "Employees' Performance in Islamic Banking," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 31-42.
    20. Alexandra Luciana GUTA, 2018. "Organizational Learning Capability. Model Testing In Universities," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 229-240, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:1:s0048733324001896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.