IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v49y2015icp1261-1270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative-based evaluation of the environmental impact and sustainability of a proposed onshore wind farm in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Phillips, Jason

Abstract

In this paper, a quantitative-based evaluation of the environmental impact of a proposed wind farm is presented using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM). The paper uses the revised Environmental Statement of the Grove Farm Wind Energy Project, which was rejected during the planning decision consent stage initially and upheld on appeal. The paper evaluates quantitatively the potential impact of an onshore wind farm at the construction and operation stages. Based on the RIAM evaluation conducted, the paper then goes on to apply a mathematical model to the results to determine the indicated potential level and nature of sustainability of the proposed wind farm. The results indicate that the Grove Farm project was deemed, as a whole, detrimental to the environment–human system, particularly in respect to impacts to visual amenity and cultural heritage. The application of the model to the RIAM indicated that in both the construction and operation stages, the project was considered as unsustainable. The results obtained raised legitimate questions as to the benefits of such projects as a major contributor to the UK׳s renewable and sustainable energy mix.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillips, Jason, 2015. "A quantitative-based evaluation of the environmental impact and sustainability of a proposed onshore wind farm in the United Kingdom," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1261-1270.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:49:y:2015:i:c:p:1261-1270
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115004529
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phillips, Jason, 2013. "Determining the sustainability of large-scale photovoltaic solar power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 435-444.
    2. Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A. & Islam, M.R. & Solangi, K.H., 2011. "Environmental impact of wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2423-2430, June.
    3. Phillips, Jason, 2010. "Evaluating the level and nature of sustainable development for a geothermal power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2414-2425, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Enevoldsen, Peter, 2016. "Onshore wind energy in Northern European forests: Reviewing the risks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1251-1262.
    2. Shen, Ge & Xu, Bin & Jin, Yunxiang & Chen, Shi & Zhang, Wenbo & Guo, Jian & Liu, Hang & Zhang, Yujing & Yang, Xiuchun, 2017. "Monitoring wind farms occupying grasslands based on remote-sensing data from China’s GF-2 HD satellite—A case study of Jiuquan city, Gansu province, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 128-136.
    3. Josimović, Boško & Cvjetić, Aleksandar & Furundžić, Danilo, 2021. "Strategic Environmental Assessment and the precautionary principle in the spatial planning of wind farms – European experience in Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Ioannidis, R. & Mamassis, N. & Efstratiadis, A. & Koutsoyiannis, D., 2022. "Reversing visibility analysis: Towards an accelerated a priori assessment of landscape impacts of renewable energy projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido C. Guerrero-Liquet & Santiago Oviedo-Casado & J. M. Sánchez-Lozano & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Javier Prior & Antonio Urbina, 2018. "Determination of the Optimal Size of Photovoltaic Systems by Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Vrînceanu, Alexandra & Dumitrașcu, Monica & Kucsicsa, Gheorghe, 2022. "Site suitability for photovoltaic farms and current investment in Romania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 320-330.
    3. Kong, Karen Gah Hie & How, Bing Shen & Lim, Juin Yau & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Moser, Irene & Sunarso, Jaka, 2022. "Shaving electric bills with renewables? A multi-period pinch-based methodology for energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    4. Phillips, Jason, 2012. "Applying a mathematical model of sustainability to the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix evaluation of the coal mining tailings dumps in the Jiului Valley, Romania," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 17-25.
    5. Cheng Guo & Delin Wang, 2019. "Frequency Regulation and Coordinated Control for Complex Wind Power Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, May.
    6. Villacreses, Geovanna & Gaona, Gabriel & Martínez-Gómez, Javier & Jijón, Diego Juan, 2017. "Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 275-286.
    7. Mazhar H. Baloch & Safdar A. Abro & Ghulam Sarwar Kaloi & Nayyar H. Mirjat & Sohaib Tahir & M. Haroon Nadeem & Mehr Gul & Zubair A. Memon & Mahendar Kumar, 2017. "A Research on Electricity Generation from Wind Corridors of Pakistan (Two Provinces): A Technical Proposal for Remote Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-31, September.
    8. Moura Carneiro, F.O. & Barbosa Rocha, H.H. & Costa Rocha, P.A., 2013. "Investigation of possible societal risk associated with wind power generation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 30-36.
    9. Wu, Yuan-Kang & Han, Gia-Yo & Lee, Ching-Yin, 2013. "Planning 10 onshore wind farms with corresponding interconnection network and power system analysis for low-carbon-island development on Penghu Island, Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 531-540.
    10. Copena, Damián & Simón, Xavier, 2018. "Wind farms and payments to landowners: Opportunities for rural development for the case of Galicia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-47.
    11. Kumar, Yogesh & Ringenberg, Jordan & Depuru, Soma Shekara & Devabhaktuni, Vijay K. & Lee, Jin Woo & Nikolaidis, Efstratios & Andersen, Brett & Afjeh, Abdollah, 2016. "Wind energy: Trends and enabling technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 209-224.
    12. Rosa Mª Regueiro-Ferreira & María Cadaval Sampedro, 2023. "Renewable energy taxes and environmental impacts: A critical reflection from the wind tax in Spain," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1722-1744, August.
    13. Moravec, David & Barták, Vojtěch & Puš, Vladimír & Wild, Jan, 2018. "Wind turbine impact on near-ground air temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 627-633.
    14. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Tabassum-Abbasi, & Premalatha, M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2014. "Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 270-288.
    16. Dreidy, Mohammad & Mokhlis, H. & Mekhilef, Saad, 2017. "Inertia response and frequency control techniques for renewable energy sources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 144-155.
    17. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Energy–water nexus of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Romanic, Djordje & Parvu, Dan & Refan, Maryam & Hangan, Horia, 2018. "Wind and tornado climatologies and wind resource modelling for a modern development situated in “Tornado Alley”," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 97-112.
    19. Lucia Saganeiti & Angela Pilogallo & Giuseppe Faruolo & Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante, 2020. "Territorial Fragmentation and Renewable Energy Source Plants: Which Relationship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Anabela Botelho & Lígia Costa Pinto & Patricia Sousa, 2013. "Valuing wind farms’ environmental impacts by geographical distance: A contingent valuation study in Portugal," NIMA Working Papers 52, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:49:y:2015:i:c:p:1261-1270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.