Author
Listed:
- Song, Wei
- Sun, Huiru
- Pang, Weixin
- Chen, Bingbing
- Song, Yongchen
- Yang, Mingjun
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in ocean or permafrost regions based on hydrate technology is one of the most promising carbon-negative technologies. Especially, direct CO2 hydrate storage in permafrost regions, which has the most potential for long-term sequestration, maximally decreases the sequestration leaking threats. Therefore, in this paper, we provide a complete summary of the feasibility, potential and site selection of CO2 hydrate sequestration in permafrost regions. In particular, we detailedly summarized the natural evidence of the gas hydrates long-term and stable existence in permafrost and near-polar regions over the past 60 years. Furthermore, the CO2 hydrate crystal structure, thermodynamic and kinetic phase transfer properties under permafrost conditions are introduced from mechanism and modeling perspectives. Additionally, the applicability of conventional geological carbon sequestration techniques and transferability of hydrate extraction cases in permafrost environments is analyzed from an engineering application perspective. Based on the huge CO2 hydrate storage potential in permafrost region, the carbon storage site selection guidelines are explained, with China as an example. The factors such as the area of the permafrost regions, depth, continuity and stability of the permafrost layer, permafrost geomechanics and industrial support capabilities are analyzed in detail. In contrast, the Mohe region in the Great Xing'an Mountains is considered the most promising storage site. Finally, we emphasize the importance of ecological impacts of carbon sequestration in permafrost regions and describe the directions for future research.
Suggested Citation
Song, Wei & Sun, Huiru & Pang, Weixin & Chen, Bingbing & Song, Yongchen & Yang, Mingjun, 2025.
"Status and perspectives of the hydrate technology for carbon sequestration in permafrost region: A review,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:rensus:v:218:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004782
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115805
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:218:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.