IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i6p590-d568099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Troy J. Bouffard

    (Center for Arctic Security and Resilience, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA)

  • Ekaterina Uryupova

    (Association of Polar Early Career Scientists, Arctic Institute, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland)

  • Klaus Dodds

    (Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK)

  • Vladimir E. Romanovsky

    (Geophysical Institute (Emeritus), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA)

  • Alec P. Bennett

    (School of Management, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA)

  • Dmitry Streletskiy

    (Department of Geography, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

Abstract

While the world continues to work toward an understanding and projections of climate change impacts, the Arctic increasingly becomes a critical component as a bellwether region. Scientific cooperation is a well-supported narrative and theme in general, but in reality, presents many challenges and counter-productive difficulties. Moreover, data sharing specifically represents one of the more critical cooperation requirements, as part of the “scientific method [which] allows for verification of results and extending research from prior results”. One of the important pieces of the climate change puzzle is permafrost. In general, observational data on permafrost characteristics are limited. Currently, most permafrost data remain fragmented and restricted to national authorities, including scientific institutes. The preponderance of permafrost data is not available openly—important datasets reside in various government or university labs, where they remain largely unknown or where access restrictions prevent effective use. Although highly authoritative, separate data efforts involving creation and management result in a very incomplete picture of the state of permafrost as well as what to possibly anticipate. While nations maintain excellent individual permafrost research programs, a lack of shared research—especially data—significantly reduces effectiveness of understanding permafrost overall. Different nations resource and employ various approaches to studying permafrost, including the growing complexity of scientific modeling. Some are more effective than others and some achieve different purposes than others. Whereas it is not possible for a nation to effectively conduct the variety of modeling and research needed to comprehensively understand impacts to permafrost, a global community can. In some ways, separate scientific communities are not necessarily concerned about sharing data—their work is secured. However, decision and policy makers, especially on the international stage, struggle to understand how best to anticipate and prepare for changes, and thus support for scientific recommendations during policy development. To date, there is a lack of research exploring the need to share circumpolar permafrost data. This article will explore the global data systems on permafrost, which remain sporadic, rarely updated, and with almost nothing about the subsea permafrost publicly available. The authors suggest that the global permafrost monitoring system should be real time (within technical and reasonable possibility), often updated and with open access to the data (general way of representing data required). Additionally, it will require robust co-ordination in terms of accessibility, funding, and protocols to avoid either duplication and/or information sharing. Following a brief background, this article will offer three supporting themes, (1) the current state of permafrost data, (2) rationale and methods to share data, and (3) implications for global and national interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Troy J. Bouffard & Ekaterina Uryupova & Klaus Dodds & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Alec P. Bennett & Dmitry Streletskiy, 2021. "Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:590-:d:568099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica L Couture & Rachael E Blake & Gavin McDonald & Colette L Ward, 2018. "A funder-imposed data publication requirement seldom inspired data sharing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Kevin Schaefer & Yasin Elshorbany & Elchin Jafarov & Paul F. Schuster & Robert G. Striegl & Kimberly P. Wickland & Elsie M. Sunderland, 2020. "Potential impacts of mercury released from thawing permafrost," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    3. Tim Flink & Ulrich Schreiterer, 2010. "Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(9), pages 665-677, November.
    4. Martin Kowarsch & Jennifer Garard & Pauline Riousset & Dominic Lenzi & Marcel J. Dorsch & Brigitte Knopf & Jan-Albrecht Harrs & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2016. "Scientific assessments to facilitate deliberative policy learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Sharon L. Smith & Hanne H. Christiansen, 2010. "Permafrost thermal state in the polar Northern Hemisphere during the international polar year 2007–2009: a synthesis," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 106-116, April.
    6. Youhua Ran & Xin Li & Guodong Cheng & Tingjun Zhang & Qingbai Wu & Huijun Jin & Rui Jin, 2012. "Distribution of Permafrost in China: An Overview of Existing Permafrost Maps," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 322-333, October.
    7. Garret Christensen & Allan Dafoe & Edward Miguel & Don A Moore & Andrew K Rose, 2019. "A study of the impact of data sharing on article citations using journal policies as a natural experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Jan Hjort & Olli Karjalainen & Juha Aalto & Sebastian Westermann & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Frederick E. Nelson & Bernd Etzelmüller & Miska Luoto, 2018. "Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikhail Yu. Filimonov & Yaroslav K. Kamnev & Aleksandr N. Shein & Nataliia A. Vaganova, 2022. "Modeling the Temperature Field in Frozen Soil under Buildings in the City of Salekhard Taking into Account Temperature Monitoring," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moritz Langer & Thomas Schneider Deimling & Sebastian Westermann & Rebecca Rolph & Ralph Rutte & Sofia Antonova & Volker Rachold & Michael Schultz & Alexander Oehme & Guido Grosse, 2023. "Thawing permafrost poses environmental threat to thousands of sites with legacy industrial contamination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Shijin Wang, 2024. "Opportunities and threats of cryosphere change to the achievement of UN 2030 SDGs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Yanyu Zhang & Shuying Zang & Miao Li & Xiangjin Shen & Yue Lin, 2021. "Spatial Distribution of Permafrost in the Xing’an Mountains of Northeast China from 2001 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    4. N. A. Serova & V. A. Serova, 2021. "Transport Infrastructure of the Russian Arctic: Specifics Features and Development Prospects," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 214-220, March.
    5. B. N. Porfiriev & D. O. Eliseev, 2023. "Scenario Forecasts of Expected Damage from Permafrost Degradation: Regional and Industry Issues," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 651-659, October.
    6. Haas, Peter M., 2018. "Preserving the epistemic authority of science in world politics," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2018-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Rüffin, Nicolas & Rüland, Anna-Lena, 2022. "Between global collaboration and national competition: Unraveling the many faces of Arctic science diplomacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58((Art. No.), pages 1-12.
    8. Andrei Polejack & Sigi Gruber & Mary S. Wisz, 2021. "Atlantic Ocean science diplomacy in action: the pole-to-pole All Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Joel Ferguson & Rebecca Littman & Garret Christensen & Elizabeth Levy Paluck & Nicholas Swanson & Zenan Wang & Edward Miguel & David Birke & John-Henry Pezzuto, 2023. "Survey of open science practices and attitudes in the social sciences," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Martin Bohle & Cornelia E. Nauen & Eduardo Marone, 2019. "Ethics to Intersect Civic Participation and Formal Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Elisabeth Epping, 2020. "Lifting the smokescreen of science diplomacy: comparing the political instrumentation of science and innovation centres," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Wei Shan & Chengcheng Zhang & Ying Guo & Lisha Qiu & Zhichao Xu & Yan Wang, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Variation Characteristics of Permafrost Temperature in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai M. & Hartley, Jonathan S. & Heyes, Anthony, 2023. "Do Pre-Registration and Pre-Analysis Plans Reduce p-Hacking and Publication Bias?: Evidence from 15,992 Test Statistics and Suggestions for Improvement," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1147 [pre.], Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Georgii A. Alexandrov & Veronika A. Ginzburg & Gregory E. Insarov & Anna A. Romanovskaya, 2021. "CMIP6 model projections leave no room for permafrost to persist in Western Siberia under the SSP5-8.5 scenario," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Groom, Ben & Linsenmeier, Manuel & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Some like it cold: Heterogeneity in the temperature-economy relationships of Europe," SocArXiv tcnad, Center for Open Science.
    17. Monika Szkarłat, 2020. "Science diplomacy of Poland," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai & Neisser, Carina, 2022. "P-Hacking, Data Type and Data-Sharing Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 15586, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Bettina Suhr & Johanna Dungl & Alexander Stocker, 2020. "Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Caroline S Wagner & Denis F, 2023. "China’s use of formal science and technology agreements as a tool of diplomacy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 807-817.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:590-:d:568099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.