IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v210y2025ics1364032124009821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing incumbent energy firms’ radical innovations implementation – A review

Author

Listed:
  • Karltorp, K.
  • Perez Vico, E.

Abstract

To address the challenges of energy transition necessary for sustainable development, incumbents must implement innovations, some of which are radical compared with their current competence-base or market solutions. This requires a thorough understanding of the prerequisites for implementing innovation. The literature on the factors influencing incumbents' implementation is vast and dispersed across multiple fields, with sometimes contradictory findings. As a result, it is difficult to get a clear picture what influences innovation implementation. This study explores the factors that condition the propensity of incumbent firms to implement radical innovations relevant to the energy transition and examines how these factors influence. A systematic literature review was conducted, covering 43 articles. The study identifies and explains the influence of 20 such factors on implementation. Nine factors are firm-external and relate to the themes of socioeconomic-political pressure, innovation conditions and industry conditions. Eleven factors are firm-internal and relate the themes of organisational properties, absorptive capacity, and internal alignment with the innovation. Causal relationships between these internal and external factors were discovered, as well as complementary influences on implementation. Potential future research venues are proposed, including scarcely recognized factors that merit further attention, factor complementarity and interdependency, and empirical gaps in terms of geographic context. It also offers policy and management implications, concluding that to gain a thorough understanding of the prerequisites for implementation, it is necessary to simultaneously consider a wide range of factors and their interconnectedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Karltorp, K. & Perez Vico, E., 2025. "Factors influencing incumbent energy firms’ radical innovations implementation – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124009821
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009821
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schleicher-Tappeser, Ruggero, 2012. "How renewables will change electricity markets in the next five years," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 64-75.
    2. Welcome Sibanda & Abderazak Bakhouche & Mercy Chaita & Mounir Kehal, 2020. "Disruptive technology adoption dynamics by United Arab Emirates small-to-medium enterprises," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 477-503.
    3. Kersti Karltorp & Shanyun Sam Lu & Eugenia Perez Vico, 2024. "Three incumbents restructuring the Swedish energy and steel regimes: the case of Hybrit," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 1058-1092, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajendran, Rajitha & Krishnaswamy, Jayaraman & Subramaniam, Nava & Viswanathan, P.K., 2025. "Renewable R&D investments and carbon emissions in G7 countries: The mediating roles of technology and economic efficiency," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    2. Ma, Li & Wang, Lingfeng & Liu, Zhaoxi, 2021. "Multi-level trading community formation and hybrid trading network construction in local energy market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. Cross, Sam & Hast, Aira & Kuhi-Thalfeldt, Reeli & Syri, Sanna & Streimikiene, Dalia & Denina, Arta, 2015. "Progress in renewable electricity in Northern Europe towards EU 2020 targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1768-1780.
    4. Huijben, J.C.C.M. & Verbong, G.P.J., 2013. "Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 362-370.
    5. Helms, Thorsten, 2016. "Asset transformation and the challenges to servitize a utility business model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 98-112.
    6. Abate, Arega Getaneh & Riccardi, Rossana & Ruiz, Carlos, 2022. "Contract design in electricity markets with high penetration of renewables: A two-stage approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Imke Lammers & Lea Diestelmeier, 2017. "Experimenting with Law and Governance for Decentralized Electricity Systems: Adjusting Regulation to Reality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Edens, Marga G. & Lavrijssen, Saskia A.C.M., 2019. "Balancing public values during the energy transition – How can German and Dutch DSOs safeguard sustainability?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 57-65.
    9. Cho, Sangmin & Kim, Jinsoo & Lim, Deokoh, 2024. "Optimal design of renewable energy certificate multipliers using an LCOE-Integrated AHP model: A case study of South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Klein, Martin & Ziade, Ahmad & de Vries, Laurens, 2019. "Aligning prosumers with the electricity wholesale market – The impact of time-varying price signals and fixed network charges on solar self-consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Cosima J√§gemann & Simeon Hagspiel & Dietmar Lindenberger, 2013. "The Economic Inefficiency of Grid Parity: The Case of German Photovoltaics," EWI Working Papers 2013-19, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    12. Binh Nguyen, Duong & Nong, Duy & Simshauser, Paul & Nguyen-Huy, Thong, 2022. "General equilibrium impact evaluation of food top-up induced by households’ renewable power self-supply in 141 regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    13. Boßmann, Tobias & Eser, Eike Johannes, 2016. "Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1637-1656.
    14. Ehrlich, Lars G. & Klamka, Jonas & Wolf, André, 2015. "The potential of decentralized power-to-heat as a flexibility option for the german electricity system: A microeconomic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 417-428.
    15. Pohlmann, Angela, 2019. "Dismantling the relationship between energy innovations and power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Brange, Lisa & Englund, Jessica & Lauenburg, Patrick, 2016. "Prosumers in district heating networks – A Swedish case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 492-500.
    17. Sisodia, Gyanendra Singh & Soares, Isabel & Ferreira, Paula, 2016. "Modeling business risk: The effect of regulatory revision on renewable energy investment - The Iberian case," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 303-313.
    18. Personal, Enrique & Guerrero, Juan Ignacio & Garcia, Antonio & Peña, Manuel & Leon, Carlos, 2014. "Key performance indicators: A useful tool to assess Smart Grid goals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 976-988.
    19. Bertschek, Irene & Briglauer, Wolfgang & Hüschelrath, Kai & Krämer, Jan & Frübing, Stefan & Kesler, Reinhold & Saam, Marianne, 2016. "Metastudie zum Fachdialog Ordnungsrahmen für die Digitale Wirtschaft: Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi)," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 147040, October.
    20. Lang, Tillmann & Gloerfeld, Erik & Girod, Bastien, 2015. "Don׳t just follow the sun – A global assessment of economic performance for residential building photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 932-951.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124009821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.