IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v210y2025ics136403212400875x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modelling tool selection for decarbonising industrial process heat systems

Author

Listed:
  • Lahijani, Ahmad M.
  • Protheroe, Michael D.
  • Gschwendtner, Michael

Abstract

Industrial Process Heat systems are critical to various industrial processes, representing a significant share of global energy use and emissions. Effective modelling of these systems is essential for evaluating long-term economic and environmental impacts of different technologies. This modelling approach must integrate internal process-specific parameters, such as heat demand dynamics and technological metrics, alongside broader factors like energy costs, emissions policies, and resource availability. This research introduces a comprehensive framework for selecting tools to model industrial process heat systems, focusing on technological, economic, and environmental performance. An initial evaluation of twenty-five tools led to the shortlisting of five based on criteria such as modelling accuracy, scalability, data handling, compatibility with industrial systems, and environmental impacts. Using software engineering principles, a systematic selection process was developed to categorise tools based on essential and desirable capabilities. This framework was validated through an example application, incorporating both technical and practical considerations. The findings highlight the importance of integrating dynamic simulation capabilities with real-time data analysis to improve evaluation accuracy and emphasise user-friendly interfaces to broader industry adoption. The study discusses the framework's applicability, provides key insights, and identifies existing gaps, emphasising the need for adaptable modelling tools to meet evolving industrial requirements. The future applicability of the selection process is discussed, highlighting findings from the capability categorisation, gaps to be addressed, and future trends in modelling these systems. This research contributes to sustainable industrial operations by offering a robust tool selection framework, supporting informed decision-making to reduce emissions and advance industrial sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lahijani, Ahmad M. & Protheroe, Michael D. & Gschwendtner, Michael, 2025. "A modelling tool selection for decarbonising industrial process heat systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s136403212400875x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400875X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fattahi, A. & Sijm, J. & Faaij, A., 2020. "A systemic approach to analyze integrated energy system modeling tools: A review of national models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Connolly, D. & Lund, H. & Mathiesen, B.V. & Leahy, M., 2010. "A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1059-1082, April.
    3. Limpens, Gauthier & Rixhon, Xavier & Contino, Francesco & Jeanmart, Hervé, 2024. "EnergyScope Pathway: An open-source model to optimise the energy transition pathways of a regional whole-energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    4. Chang, Miguel & Thellufsen, Jakob Zink & Zakeri, Behnam & Pickering, Bryn & Pfenninger, Stefan & Lund, Henrik & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2021. "Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Edelenbosch, O.Y. & Kermeli, K. & Crijns-Graus, W. & Worrell, E. & Bibas, R. & Fais, B. & Fujimori, S. & Kyle, P. & Sano, F. & van Vuuren, D.P., 2017. "Comparing projections of industrial energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term energy models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 701-710.
    6. Solomon, Barry D. & Krishna, Karthik, 2011. "The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7422-7431.
    7. Andrea Herbst & Felipe Andrés Toro & Felix Reitze & Eberhard Jochem, 2012. "Introduction to Energy Systems Modelling," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 148(II), pages 111-135, June.
    8. Imran Ali Shah & Xiang Gou & Jinxiang Wu, 2019. "Simulation Study of an Oxy-Biomass-Based Boiler for Nearly Zero Emission Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Atabay, Dennis, 2017. "An open-source model for optimal design and operation of industrial energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 803-821.
    10. Garwood, Tom Lloyd & Hughes, Ben Richard & Oates, Michael R. & O’Connor, Dominic & Hughes, Ruby, 2018. "A review of energy simulation tools for the manufacturing sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 895-911.
    11. Bava, Federico & Furbo, Simon, 2017. "Development and validation of a detailed TRNSYS-Matlab model for large solar collector fields for district heating applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 698-708.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Miguel & Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2023. "Perspectives on purpose-driven coupling of energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Klemm, Christian & Vennemann, Peter, 2021. "Modeling and optimization of multi-energy systems in mixed-use districts: A review of existing methods and approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Andersen, Anders N. & Sorknæs, Peter, 2022. "The business-economic energy system modelling tool energyPRO," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Ekaterina Rhodes & Kira Craig & Aaron Hoyle & Madeleine McPherson, 2021. "How Do Energy-Economy Models Compare? A Survey of Model Developers and Users in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-39, May.
    5. Misconel, S. & Zimmermann, F. & Mikurda, J. & Möst, D. & Kunze, R. & Gnann, T. & Kühnbach, M. & Speth, D. & Pelka, S. & Yu, S., 2024. "Model coupling and comparison on optimal load shifting of battery electric vehicles and heat pumps focusing on generation adequacy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    6. Martínez-Gordón, R. & Morales-España, G. & Sijm, J. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "A review of the role of spatial resolution in energy systems modelling: Lessons learned and applicability to the North Sea region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Moser, David & Nastasi, Benedetto & Sparber, Wolfram, 2020. "Classification and challenges of bottom-up energy system models - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Haugen, Mari & Blaisdell-Pijuan, Paris L. & Botterud, Audun & Levin, Todd & Zhou, Zhi & Belsnes, Michael & Korpås, Magnus & Somani, Abhishek, 2024. "Power market models for the clean energy transition: State of the art and future research needs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    9. Höffner, Dorian & Glombik, Sebastian, 2024. "Energy system planning and analysis software—A comprehensive meta-review with special attention to urban energy systems and district heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    10. Fabian Scheller & Frauke Wiese & Jann Michael Weinand & Dominik Franjo Dominkovi'c & Russell McKenna, 2021. "An expert survey to assess the current status and future challenges of energy system analysis," Papers 2106.15518, arXiv.org.
    11. Felder, F.A. & Kumar, P., 2021. "A review of existing deep decarbonization models and their potential in policymaking," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Fehler, Alexander & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Bußa, 2022. "Modeling flexibility in energy systems — comparison of power sector models based on simplified test cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    14. Jacques Després & Patrick Criqui & Silvana Mima & Nouredine Hadjsaid & Isabelle Noirot, 2014. "Variable renewable energies and storage development in long term energy modelling tools," Post-Print hal-01279467, HAL.
    15. Raventós, Oriol & Dengiz, Thomas & Medjroubi, Wided & Unaichi, Chinonso & Bruckmeier, Andreas & Finck, Rafael, 2022. "Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Löffler, Konstantin & Hainsch, Karlo & Burandt, Thorsten & Oei, Pao-Yu & Kemfert, Claudia & Von Hirschhausen, Christian, 2017. "Designing a Model for the Global Energy System—GENeSYS-MOD: An Application of the Open-Source Energy Modeling System (OSeMOSYS)," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28.
    17. Goforth, Teagan & Levin, Todd & Nock, Destenie, 2025. "Incorporating energy justice and equity objectives in power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Scheller, Fabian & Bruckner, Thomas, 2019. "Energy system optimization at the municipal level: An analysis of modeling approaches and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 444-461.
    19. Golmohamadi, Hessam & Larsen, Kim Guldstrand & Jensen, Peter Gjøl & Hasrat, Imran Riaz, 2022. "Integration of flexibility potentials of district heating systems into electricity markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Yao Li & Liulin Yang & Tianlu Luo, 2023. "Energy System Low-Carbon Transition under Dual-Carbon Goals: The Case of Guangxi, China Using the EnergyPLAN Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:210:y:2025:i:c:s136403212400875x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.