IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v184y2023ics1364032123004197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of sector-coupled energy systems using different foresight horizons

Author

Listed:
  • Lambert, Jerry
  • Hanel, Andreas
  • Fendt, Sebastian
  • Spliethoff, Hartmut

Abstract

Energy system models are increasingly being used in politics, industry and science. At the same time, model complexity continues to increase. Different possibilities of computing time reduction are in use, for example rolling horizons and incremental optimisation with reduced foresight. However, the combination of using strongly sector-coupled models with different foresight variants, in particular, has not been investigated thoroughly yet. This study aims to evaluate different model foresights by using a mathematical model of the German energy system, which includes electricity and heat supply as well as the supply of basic chemicals and mobility. Three scenarios of this model are used to evaluate the influences of changing foresights. The considered foresight variants are perfect foresight, myopia incremental, and myopia with foresight. Carbon budget models are shown to be more suitable than the price drop and CO2 price variants with the aim to minimise deviations from the least-cost energy system transformation. Moreover, this study demonstrates the importance of the chosen model foresight. If the goal of the optimisation is to simulate unforeseen events or shocks, the foresight of the model should be chosen to have a rather small value to depict a realistic reaction of the model. If the goal is rather to simulate long-lasting consequences of decisions taken at the beginning of the simulation, the foresight horizons should be chosen to be rather long while also considering the computational costs that scale with increasing foresight.

Suggested Citation

  • Lambert, Jerry & Hanel, Andreas & Fendt, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Evaluation of sector-coupled energy systems using different foresight horizons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:184:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123004197
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123004197
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clara F. Heuberger & Iain Staffell & Nilay Shah & Niall Mac Dowell, 2018. "Impact of myopic decision-making and disruptive events in power systems planning," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 634-640, August.
    2. Jessica Thomsen & Noha Saad Hussein & Arnold Dolderer & Christoph Kost, 2021. "Effect of the Foresight Horizon on Computation Time and Results Using a Regional Energy Systems Optimization Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Chen, Huayi & Ma, Tieju, 2014. "Technology adoption with limited foresight and uncertain technological learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 266-275.
    4. Gerbaulet, C. & von Hirschhausen, C. & Kemfert, C. & Lorenz, C. & Oei, P.-Y., 2019. "European electricity sector decarbonization under different levels of foresight," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 973-987.
    5. Siala, Kais & Mier, Mathias & Schmidt, Lukas & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Sheykhha, Siamak & Savvidis, Georgios, 2022. "Which model features matter? An experimental approach to evaluate power market modeling choices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    7. Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2016. "Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 182-193.
    8. Jiang, L. & Gonzalez-Diaz, A. & Ling-Chin, J. & Roskilly, A.P. & Smallbone, A.J., 2019. "Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant using activated carbon adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Caramanna, Giorgio & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2014. "An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 426-443.
    10. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2015. "A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 310-331.
    11. Muhammad Aziz & Agung Tri Wijayanta & Asep Bayu Dani Nandiyanto, 2020. "Ammonia as Effective Hydrogen Storage: A Review on Production, Storage and Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica Thomsen & Noha Saad Hussein & Arnold Dolderer & Christoph Kost, 2021. "Effect of the Foresight Horizon on Computation Time and Results Using a Regional Energy Systems Optimization Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: Insights from integrated value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Nastasi, Benedetto & Groppi, Daniele & Misconel, Steffi & Garcia, Davide Astiaso & Sparber, Wolfram, 2022. "Comparison methods of energy system frameworks, models and scenario results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Mier, Mathias & Siala, Kais & Govorukha, Kristina & Mayer, Philip, 2023. "Collaboration, decarbonization, and distributional effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Abuzayed, Anas & Hartmann, Niklas, 2022. "MyPyPSA-Ger: Introducing CO2 taxes on a multi-regional myopic roadmap of the German electricity system towards achieving the 1.5 °C target by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    6. Flores-Quiroz, Angela & Strunz, Kai, 2021. "A distributed computing framework for multi-stage stochastic planning of renewable power systems with energy storage as flexibility option," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    7. Valeriya Azarova & Mathias Mier, 2021. "Unraveling the Black Box of Power Market Models," ifo Working Paper Series 357, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    8. Zappa, William & Junginger, Martin & van den Broek, Machteld, 2021. "Can liberalised electricity markets support decarbonised portfolios in line with the Paris Agreement? A case study of Central Western Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Wahiba Yaïci & Evgueniy Entchev & Michela Longo, 2022. "Recent Advances in Small-Scale Carbon Capture Systems for Micro-Combined Heat and Power Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Sharma, Tarun & Glynn, James & Panos, Evangelos & Deane, Paul & Gargiulo, Maurizio & Rogan, Fionn & Gallachóir, Brian Ó, 2019. "High performance computing for energy system optimization models: Enhancing the energy policy tool kit," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 66-74.
    11. Sitarz, Joanna & Pahle, Michael & Osorio, Sebastian & Luderer, Gunnar & Pietzcker, Robert, 2023. "EU carbon prices signal high policy credibility and farsighted actors," EconStor Preprints 280455, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Guerra, Omar J. & Tejada, Diego A. & Reklaitis, Gintaras V., 2016. "An optimization framework for the integrated planning of generation and transmission expansion in interconnected power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-21.
    13. Mathias Mier & Kais Siala & Kristina Govorukha & Philip Mayer, 2020. "Costs and Benefits of Political and Physical Collaboration in the European Power Market," ifo Working Paper Series 343, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    14. Hanna, Richard & Gross, Robert, 2021. "How do energy systems model and scenario studies explicitly represent socio-economic, political and technological disruption and discontinuity? Implications for policy and practitioners," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Varone, Alberto & Ferrari, Michele, 2015. "Power to liquid and power to gas: An option for the German Energiewende," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 207-218.
    16. Hirt, Léon F. & Sahakian, Marlyne & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2022. "What subnational imaginaries for solar PV? The case of the Swiss energy transition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    19. Luo, Yu & Shi, Yixiang & Li, Wenying & Cai, Ningsheng, 2014. "Comprehensive modeling of tubular solid oxide electrolysis cell for co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 420-434.
    20. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:184:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123004197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.