IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v15y2011i6p2743-2749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Turkey's current energy status: A case study for wind energy potential of Çanakkale province

Author

Listed:
  • Celik, Ali N.

Abstract

Turkey is a free market economy that is oriented towards Western markets. It also has strong ambitions to join the European Union and this factor has been beneficial but also taxing with respect to its changing economic situation. Turkey imports nearly 70% of its energy requirements. The country spends 40-50% of its total export income to import fuel, mainly crude oil and natural gas. On the other hand, Turkey has significant wind energy potential because of its geographical characteristics, such as its shoreline and mountain-valley structures. The sea fronts of the Agean, Marmara, Mediterranean, and Black Seas, and some places of the Southeast Anatolian belt have a high wind potential, with an average speed of 4.5-10Â m/s. Studies put wind-energy potential in terms of the technical aspects in the region of 80Â GW. Çanakkale province that has more than 10% of the country's total installed wind power has been presently chosen for the case study. In the present study, hourly time-series wind data recorded from the year 2000 to 2005 at a height of 10Â m in Çanakkale city centre and Bozcaada, an island in the Aegean Sea belonging to the Çanakkale province, has been statistically analysed. Overall, Bozcaada, with an annual mean density value higher than 350Â W/m2, offers a much higher wind potential than the former location, indicating sufficient wind potential for large scale electricity generation. The mean power density value in the northeastern direction is highest for the typical year in Bozcaada with a value of 901.6Â W/m2, while the directional power density distribution shows that over 60% of the wind energy comes from the band between northern and northeastern directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Celik, Ali N., 2011. "Review of Turkey's current energy status: A case study for wind energy potential of Çanakkale province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2743-2749, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:6:p:2743-2749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032111001171
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xydis, G. & Koroneos, C. & Loizidou, M., 2009. "Exergy analysis in a wind speed prognostic model as a wind farm sitting selection tool: A case study in Southern Greece," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2411-2420, November.
    2. Mathew, Sathyajith & Pandey, K.P. & Kumar.V, Anil, 2002. "Analysis of wind regimes for energy estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 381-399.
    3. Arslan, Oguz, 2010. "Technoeconomic analysis of electricity generation from wind energy in Kutahya, Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 120-131.
    4. Fyrippis, Ioannis & Axaopoulos, Petros J. & Panayiotou, Gregoris, 2010. "Wind energy potential assessment in Naxos Island, Greece," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 577-586, February.
    5. Ahmed Shata, A.S. & Hanitsch, R., 2006. "Evaluation of wind energy potential and electricity generation on the coast of Mediterranean Sea in Egypt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1183-1202.
    6. Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2010. "Wind energy status in renewable electrical energy production in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 2104-2112, September.
    7. Akdag, Seyit Ahmet & Güler, Önder, 2010. "Evaluation of wind energy investment interest and electricity generation cost analysis for Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2574-2580, August.
    8. Aksoy, Bülent, 1997. "Estimated monthly average global radiation for Turkey and its comparison with observations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 625-633.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaniktepe, B. & Koroglu, T. & Savrun, M.M., 2013. "Investigation of wind characteristics and wind energy potential in Osmaniye, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 703-711.
    2. Oner, Yasemin & Ozcira, Selin & Bekiroglu, Nur & Senol, Ibrahim, 2013. "A comparative analysis of wind power density prediction methods for Çanakkale, Intepe region, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 491-502.
    3. Tiang, Tow Leong & Ishak, Dahaman, 2012. "Technical review of wind energy potential as small-scale power generation sources in Penang Island Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3034-3042.
    4. Dursun, Bahtiyar & Gokcol, Cihan, 2014. "Impacts of the renewable energy law on the developments of wind energy in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 318-325.
    5. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2013. "Vision 2023: Feasibility analysis of Turkey's renewable energy projection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 570-575.
    6. Camadan, Ercüment, 2011. "An assessment on the current status and future of wind energy in Turkish electricity industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4994-5002.
    7. Pishgar-Komleh, S.H. & Keyhani, A. & Sefeedpari, P., 2015. "Wind speed and power density analysis based on Weibull and Rayleigh distributions (a case study: Firouzkooh county of Iran)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 313-322.
    8. Elibol, Erdem & Özmen, Özge Tüzün & Tutkun, Nedim & Köysal, Oğuz, 2017. "Outdoor performance analysis of different PV panel types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 651-661.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:6:p:2743-2749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.