IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v127y2020ics1364032120301726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solid oxide fuel cell technology paths: National innovation system contributions from Japan and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandes, Marina Domingues
  • Bistritzki, Victor
  • Domingues, Rosana Zacarias
  • Matencio, Tulio
  • Rapini, Márcia
  • Sinisterra, Rubén Dario

Abstract

This study discusses the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology paths in the United States and Japan under the national innovation system (NIS) framework using the available literature and a patent landscape. By examining technology trajectories, it is possible to identify and justify the patterns of key players and institutions from the NISs of the two countries that shaped the development of these technologies. These patterns are especially relevant to the analysis of the role of institutional arrangements in policymaking. This study presents the concept of a NIS and explores the main aspects of the Japanese and U.S. NISs regarding the SOFC technology path. This study analyzes historical patent evolution, patent applicants and their industrial sectors, international patent classifications (IPCs) and international patent activity. Moreover, this study highlights the correlations of the SOFC manufacturing and operation with patent data. This study examines the role of NISs in SOFC technology shaping from two main aspects: through independent historical events that motivated the establishment of institutional arrangements from which SOFCs have benefited and through shaping policies and efforts that are intended to promote the development of SOFC and related technologies. The results of this study demonstrate differences in terms of the sectors that are involved in the SOFC patenting activity, the IPCs of the filed patents and the international patent activity, which support the role of NISs in technology shaping.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandes, Marina Domingues & Bistritzki, Victor & Domingues, Rosana Zacarias & Matencio, Tulio & Rapini, Márcia & Sinisterra, Rubén Dario, 2020. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology paths: National innovation system contributions from Japan and the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120301726
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120301726
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Polzin, Friedemann & Migendt, Michael & Täube, Florian A. & von Flotow, Paschen, 2015. "Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—A panel data study across OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 98-111.
    2. Wei, Max & Smith, Sarah J. & Sohn, Michael D., 2017. "Experience curve development and cost reduction disaggregation for fuel cell markets in Japan and the US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 346-357.
    3. Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2005. "University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 583-594, June.
    4. Albino, Vito & Ardito, Lorenzo & Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2014. "Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 836-854.
    5. Vasudeva, Gurneeta, 2009. "How national institutions influence technology policies and firms' knowledge-building strategies: A study of fuel cell innovation across industrialized countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1248-1259, October.
    6. Goto, Akira, 2000. "Japan's National Innovation System: Current Status and Problems," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 103-113, Summer.
    7. Somalu, Mahendra R. & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Daud, Wan Ramli Wan & Brandon, Nigel P., 2017. "Screen-printing inks for the fabrication of solid oxide fuel cell films: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 426-439.
    8. Sharaf, Omar Z. & Orhan, Mehmet F., 2014. "An overview of fuel cell technology: Fundamentals and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 810-853.
    9. Damo, U.M. & Ferrari, M.L. & Turan, A. & Massardo, A.F., 2019. "Solid oxide fuel cell hybrid system: A detailed review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 235-246.
    10. John C. Scott, 2006. "The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 1-39, January.
    11. Nelson, Richard R., 1990. "U.S. technological leadership: Where did it come from and where did it go?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 117-132, April.
    12. Ha, Sung Ho & Liu, Weina & Cho, Hune & Kim, Sang Hyun, 2015. "Technological advances in the fuel cell vehicle: Patent portfolio management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 277-289.
    13. Andújar, J.M. & Segura, F., 2009. "Fuel cells: History and updating. A walk along two centuries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2309-2322, December.
    14. Raluca-Andreea Felseghi & Elena Carcadea & Maria Simona Raboaca & Cătălin Nicolae TRUFIN & Constantin Filote, 2019. "Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology for the Sustainable Future of Stationary Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-28, December.
    15. Elmer, Theo & Worall, Mark & Wu, Shenyi & Riffat, Saffa B., 2015. "Fuel cell technology for domestic built environment applications: State of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 913-931.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giorgia Ghiara & Paolo Piccardo & Valeria Bongiorno & Christian Geipel & Roberto Spotorno, 2020. "Characterization of Metallic Interconnects Extracted from Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stacks Operated up to 20,000 h in Real Life Conditions: The Air Side," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Yuanwu Xu & Hao Shu & Hongchuan Qin & Xiaolong Wu & Jingxuan Peng & Chang Jiang & Zhiping Xia & Yongan Wang & Xi Li, 2022. "Real-Time State of Health Estimation for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Based on Unscented Kalman Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed, Hanin & Al-Othman, Amani & Nancarrow, Paul & Tawalbeh, Muhammad & El Haj Assad, Mamdouh, 2019. "Direct hydrocarbon fuel cells: A promising technology for improving energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 207-219.
    2. Das, Himadry Shekhar & Tan, Chee Wei & Yatim, A.H.M., 2017. "Fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles: A review on power conditioning units and topologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 268-291.
    3. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Kenta Ikeuchi & Masatoshi Kato, 2022. "Trademarks as an indicator of regional innovation: evidence from Japanese prefectures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 190-209, February.
    4. Song, Kisik & Kim, Kyuwoong & Lee, Sungjoo, 2018. "Identifying promising technologies using patents: A retrospective feature analysis and a prospective needs analysis on outlier patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 118-132.
    5. Jiang, Jianhua & Zhou, Renjie & Xu, Hao & Wang, Hao & Wu, Ping & Wang, Zhuo & Li, Jian, 2022. "Optimal sizing, operation strategy and case study of a grid-connected solid oxide fuel cell microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    6. Yu Sang Chang & Dosoung Choi & Hann Earl Kim, 2017. "Dynamic Trends of Carbon Intensities among 127 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Tuyet Thi Anh Nguyen & Shuo-Yan Chou, 2022. "Fusion of interval-valued neutrosophic sets and financial assessment for optimal renewable energy portfolios with uncertainties," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(4), pages 783-808, June.
    8. Montazerinejad, H. & Eicker, U., 2022. "Recent development of heat and power generation using renewable fuels: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Mitja Mori & Rok Stropnik & Mihael Sekavčnik & Andrej Lotrič, 2021. "Criticality and Life-Cycle Assessment of Materials Used in Fuel-Cell and Hydrogen Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Kim, Kyungah & Moon, Sungho & Kim, Junghun, 2023. "How far is it from your home? Strategic policy and management to overcome barriers of introducing fuel-cell power generation facilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Viviana Cigolotti & Matteo Genovese & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2021. "Comprehensive Review on Fuel Cell Technology for Stationary Applications as Sustainable and Efficient Poly-Generation Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Di Marcoberardino, G. & Chiarabaglio, L. & Manzolini, G. & Campanari, S., 2019. "A Techno-economic comparison of micro-cogeneration systems based on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell for residential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 692-705.
    13. Isa, Normazlina Mat & Tan, Chee Wei & Yatim, A.H.M., 2018. "A comprehensive review of cogeneration system in a microgrid: A perspective from architecture and operating system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2236-2263.
    14. Kok, Holmer & Faems, Dries & de Faria, Pedro, 2020. "Ties that matter: The impact of alliance partner knowledge recombination novelty on knowledge utilization in R&D alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    15. Kwan, Trevor Hocksun & Katsushi, Fujii & Shen, Yongting & Yin, Shunan & Zhang, Yongchao & Kase, Kiwamu & Yao, Qinghe, 2020. "Comprehensive review of integrating fuel cells to other energy systems for enhanced performance and enabling polygeneration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Wang, Qing-Hui & Yang, Song & Zhou, Wei & Li, Jing-Rong & Xu, Zhi-Jia & Ke, Yu-Zhi & Yu, Wei & Hu, Guang-Hua, 2018. "Optimizing the porosity configuration of porous copper fiber sintered felt for methanol steam reforming micro-reactor based on flow distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 243-261.
    17. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Bahman Amini Horri, 2021. "Progress in Material Development for Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-53, February.
    18. Xuan Shi & Lingfei Cai & Junzhi Jia, 2018. "The Evolution of International Scientific Collaboration in Fuel Cells during 1998–2017: A Social Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Liu, Yangxu & Zhou, Wei & Lin, Yu & Chen, Lu & Chu, Xuyang & Zheng, Tianqing & Wan, Shaolong & Lin, Jingdong, 2019. "Novel copper foam with ordered hole arrays as catalyst support for methanol steam reforming microreactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 24-37.
    20. Raluca-Andreea Felseghi & Elena Carcadea & Maria Simona Raboaca & Cătălin Nicolae TRUFIN & Constantin Filote, 2019. "Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology for the Sustainable Future of Stationary Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120301726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.