IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v11y2007i4p551-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourses on solar radiation modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Muneer, T.
  • Younes, S.
  • Munawwar, S.

Abstract

All solar energy applications require readily available, site-oriented and long-term solar radiation data. A typical database comprises of global, direct and diffuse solar irradiance, duration of sunshine and complementary data like cloud cover, atmospheric turbidity, humidity, temperature, etc. However, most of these stations do not provide complete if any information on solar data, chiefly due to the capital and maintenance costs that measuring instruments incur. For instance, global radiation is the most frequently measured parameter, its two components, i.e. diffuse and direct irradiance are often not measured. Improvements have been made to the meteorological radiation model MRM which, had been developed by Muneer et al. as a simple broadband irradiance estimation model based on synoptic information, by incorporating the sunshine information in the model's regressions. The result of the improvement of the model is a considerable reduction in biases and scatter in the comparison between estimated and measured data. The improved meteorological radiation model, IMRM is more accurate, by up to 70% in some cases, than its predecessor in estimating, global and diffuse horizontal irradiance. When sunshine, atmospheric pressure and temperature are not measured by a nearby station, yet cloud information is recorded, radiation estimation models based on cloud cover, CRM, can be used. Three CRMs have been compared to newly proposed models. It was found that models with locally fitted coefficients gave a more accurate estimation of the solar radiation than CRMs with generalized coefficients. The newly proposed model performed better that the older generation models. The third section of the article deals with estimation of diffuse radiation and possible improvements in its modeling. In this section, apart from clearness index (kt), influence of the synoptic parameters of sunshine fraction (SF), cloud cover (CC) and air mass (m) on diffuse fraction of global radiation (k) is studied both qualitatively and quantitatively. It is found that, SF shows a strong bearing on the k-kt relationship followed by CC and then m. As a next step, a series of models are developed for k as a polynomial function of kt, SF, CC and m. After an extensive evaluation procedure, a regression model is selected such that the diffuse radiation can be estimated with reasonable accuracy without making the model overtly complex. It was found that among all the models, the composite model involving all parameters provides the most accurate estimation of diffuse radiation. The site-specific models are further investigated for any appreciable correlations between different locations and their possible attributions. It was also found that a single model could more than adequately estimate the diffuse radiation for the locations within a given region. Three optimum models are also recommended for each region, in view of the fact that information on all parameters is not necessarily available for all sites. This study reveals a significant improvement from the conventional k-kt regression models to the presently proposed models, therefore, leading to more accurate estimation of diffuse radiation by approximately 50%.

Suggested Citation

  • Muneer, T. & Younes, S. & Munawwar, S., 2007. "Discourses on solar radiation modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 551-602, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:11:y:2007:i:4:p:551-602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364-0321(05)00059-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Daryl R., 2005. "Solar radiation modeling and measurements for renewable energy applications: data and model quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1517-1531.
    2. Younes, S. & Claywell, R. & Muneer, T., 2005. "Quality control of solar radiation data: Present status and proposed new approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1533-1549.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bey, M. & Hamidat, A. & Nacer, T., 2021. "Eco-energetic feasibility study of using grid-connected photovoltaic system in wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Kambezidis, H.D. & Psiloglou, B.E. & Karagiannis, D. & Dumka, U.C. & Kaskaoutis, D.G., 2017. "Meteorological Radiation Model (MRM v6.1): Improvements in diffuse radiation estimates and a new approach for implementation of cloud products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 616-637.
    3. Ángel Gómez-Moreno & Pedro José Casanova-Peláez & José Manuel Palomar-Carnicero & Fernando Cruz-Peragón, 2016. "Modeling and Experimental Validation of a Low-Cost Radiation Sensor Based on the Photovoltaic Effect for Building Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Al-Dousari, Ali & Al-Nassar, Waleed & Al-Hemoud, Ali & Alsaleh, Abeer & Ramadan, Ashraf & Al-Dousari, Noor & Ahmed, Modi, 2019. "Solar and wind energy: Challenges and solutions in desert regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 184-194.
    5. Yang, Liu & Cao, Qimeng & Yu, Ying & Liu, Yan, 2020. "Comparison of daily diffuse radiation models in regions of China without solar radiation measurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Zhang, Xiongwen, 2014. "A statistical approach for sub-hourly solar radiation reconstruction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 307-314.
    7. Wiktor Olchowik & Jędrzej Gajek & Andrzej Michalski, 2023. "The Use of Evolutionary Algorithms in the Modelling of Diffuse Radiation in Terms of Simulating the Energy Efficiency of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-32, March.
    8. Nunez Munoz, Maria & Ballantyne, Erica E.F. & Stone, David A., 2022. "Development and evaluation of empirical models for the estimation of hourly horizontal diffuse solar irradiance in the United Kingdom," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Majid Almaraashi, 2017. "Short-term prediction of solar energy in Saudi Arabia using automated-design fuzzy logic systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Younes, S. & Muneer, T., 2007. "Clear-sky classification procedures and models using a world-wide data-base," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(6), pages 623-645, June.
    11. Pashiardis, S. & Kalogirou, S.A., 2016. "Quality control of solar shortwave and terrestrial longwave radiation for surface radiation measurements at two sites in Cyprus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 1015-1033.
    12. Jiang, Yingni, 2008. "Prediction of monthly mean daily diffuse solar radiation using artificial neural networks and comparison with other empirical models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3833-3837, October.
    13. Blum, D.H. & Arendt, K. & Rivalin, L. & Piette, M.A. & Wetter, M. & Veje, C.T., 2019. "Practical factors of envelope model setup and their effects on the performance of model predictive control for building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 410-425.
    14. Ewa Chodakowska & Joanicjusz Nazarko & Łukasz Nazarko & Hesham S. Rabayah & Raed M. Abendeh & Rami Alawneh, 2023. "ARIMA Models in Solar Radiation Forecasting in Different Geographic Locations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Czekalski, D. & Chochowski, A. & Obstawski, P., 2012. "Parameterization of daily solar irradiance variability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2461-2467.
    16. Prieto, Jesús-Ignacio & García, David, 2022. "Global solar radiation models: A critical review from the point of view of homogeneity and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Miroslav Rimar & Marcel Fedak & Andrii Kulikov & Olha Kulikova & Martin Lopusniak, 2022. "Analysis and CFD Modeling of Thermal Collectors with a Tracker System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Gueymard, Christian A., 2014. "A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: Towards a better bankability of solar projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1024-1034.
    19. Abdel-Rahman Hedar & Majid Almaraashi & Alaa E. Abdel-Hakim & Mahmoud Abdulrahim, 2021. "Hybrid Machine Learning for Solar Radiation Prediction in Reduced Feature Spaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Laslett, Dean & Creagh, Chris & Jennings, Philip, 2014. "A method for generating synthetic hourly solar radiation data for any location in the south west of Western Australia, in a world wide web page," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 87-102.
    21. Jesús-Ignacio Prieto & David García & Ruth Santoro, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Accuracy, Simplicity and Generality of Temperature-Based Global Solar Radiation Models: Application to the Solar Map of Asturias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Younes, S. & Muneer, T., 2007. "Clear-sky classification procedures and models using a world-wide data-base," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(6), pages 623-645, June.
    2. Lam, Joseph C. & Wan, Kevin K.W. & Lau, Chris C.S. & Yang, Liu, 2008. "Climatic influences on solar modelling in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1591-1604.
    3. Liu, Yanfeng & Zhou, Yong & Chen, Yaowen & Wang, Dengjia & Wang, Yingying & Zhu, Ying, 2020. "Comparison of support vector machine and copula-based nonlinear quantile regression for estimating the daily diffuse solar radiation: A case study in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1101-1112.
    4. Moreno-Tejera, S. & Ramírez-Santigosa, L. & Silva-Pérez, M.A., 2015. "A proposed methodology for quick assessment of timestamp and quality control results of solar radiation data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 531-537.
    5. Lou, Siwei & Li, Danny H.W. & Alshaibani, Khalid A. & Xing, Haowei & Li, Zhengrong & Huang, Yu & Xia, Dawei, 2022. "An all-sky luminance and radiance distribution model for built environment studies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 822-835.
    6. Lu, Ning & Qin, Jun & Yang, Kun & Sun, Jiulin, 2011. "A simple and efficient algorithm to estimate daily global solar radiation from geostationary satellite data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3179-3188.
    7. Lee, Kwanho & Yoo, Hochun & Levermore, Geoff J., 2013. "Quality control and estimation hourly solar irradiation on inclined surfaces in South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 190-199.
    8. Zhang, Sheng & Huang, Pei & Sun, Yongjun, 2016. "A multi-criterion renewable energy system design optimization for net zero energy buildings under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 654-665.
    9. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    10. Moradi, Isaac, 2009. "Quality control of global solar radiation using sunshine duration hours," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-6.
    11. Jesús-Ignacio Prieto & David García & Ruth Santoro, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Accuracy, Simplicity and Generality of Temperature-Based Global Solar Radiation Models: Application to the Solar Map of Asturias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, May.
    12. Yin, Kaili & Zhang, Xiaojing & Xie, Jingchao & Hao, Ziyang & Xiao, Guofeng & Liu, Jiaping, 2023. "Modeling hourly solar diffuse fraction on a horizontal surface based on sky conditions clustering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Aguiar, L. Mazorra & Pereira, B. & Lauret, P. & Díaz, F. & David, M., 2016. "Combining solar irradiance measurements, satellite-derived data and a numerical weather prediction model to improve intra-day solar forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 599-610.
    14. Ángel Gómez-Moreno & Pedro José Casanova-Peláez & José Manuel Palomar-Carnicero & Fernando Cruz-Peragón, 2016. "Modeling and Experimental Validation of a Low-Cost Radiation Sensor Based on the Photovoltaic Effect for Building Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Yang, Liu & Cao, Qimeng & Yu, Ying & Liu, Yan, 2020. "Comparison of daily diffuse radiation models in regions of China without solar radiation measurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Wang, Hong & Sun, Fubao & Wang, Tingting & Liu, Wenbin, 2018. "Estimation of daily and monthly diffuse radiation from measurements of global solar radiation a case study across China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 226-241.
    17. Munawwar, Saima & Muneer, Tariq, 2007. "Statistical approach to the proposition and validation of daily diffuse irradiation models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(4), pages 455-475, April.
    18. Jianhui Bai & Xuemei Zong & Yaoming Ma & Binbin Wang & Chuanfeng Zhao & Yikung Yang & Jie Guang & Zhiyuan Cong & Kaili Li & Tao Song, 2022. "Long-Term Variations in Global Solar Radiation and Its Interaction with Atmospheric Substances at Qomolangma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Cheng, Tsung-Chieh & Cheng, Chin-Hsiang & Huang, Zhu-Zin & Liao, Guo-Chun, 2011. "Development of an energy-saving module via combination of solar cells and thermoelectric coolers for green building applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 133-140.
    20. Zehir, Mustafa Alparslan & Batman, Alp & Bagriyanik, Mustafa, 2016. "Review and comparison of demand response options for more effective use of renewable energy at consumer level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 631-642.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:11:y:2007:i:4:p:551-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.