IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v260y2026ics0960148125028095.html

Oxy-steam gasification in biomass-to -biomethane and -hydrogen processes: a thermo-economic assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Piazzi, Stefano
  • Menin, Lorenzo
  • Ress, Jenny
  • Antolini, Daniele
  • Baratieri, Marco

Abstract

Global decarbonization efforts require upscaling the production of renewable gases, including biomethane and hydrogen, with ambitions targets set by European legislation. Integrated thermochemical processes based on biomass gasification represent a potentially scalable solution for both products but require specific thermo-economic assessments to define their competitiveness. In this work we evaluate the production of biomethane and hydrogen from oxygen-steam gasification at the small-scale (250 kg/h biomass input) in both standalone and Biomass-Power-to-Gas integrated processes, estimating biomethane and hydrogen yields on biomass of 0.34–0.44 Nm3/kg and 0.49–0.94 Nm3/kg (44–84 g/kg), respectively. Process energy balances show HHV efficiencies of 66–65 % and 68–70 % for biomethane and hydrogen, respectively, where additional heat recovery from downstream purification enhances the otherwise similar efficiency of the hydrogen process. The biofuels minimum selling prices are estimated between 131 and 228 €/MWh (1.35 and 2.39 €/Nm3) for biomethane and between 299 and 329 €/MWh (11.76 and 12.93 €/kg) for hydrogen, for the standalone and Biomass-Power-to-Gas options, respectively. This indicates that if electrolysis is sized based on gasification oxygen requirements it does not deliver any cost benefits despite higher yields. Sensitivity analyses indicate a limited effect of a 50 % increase in fixed capital investment in both cases, while variations in biomass and electricity costs within the integrated Power-to-Gas scenarios show a biomethane and hydrogen price under 200 €/MWh only for electricity costs not greater than 200 and 80 €/MWh, respectively. While the economics remain relatively unfavorable, the study provides useful information for future assessments and indicates oxygen-steam gasification as competitive with conventional steam gasification options.

Suggested Citation

  • Piazzi, Stefano & Menin, Lorenzo & Ress, Jenny & Antolini, Daniele & Baratieri, Marco, 2026. "Oxy-steam gasification in biomass-to -biomethane and -hydrogen processes: a thermo-economic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:260:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125028095
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.125145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125028095
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.125145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    2. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    3. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Kaufmann-Elfang, Martin & Lundholm-Høffner, Christoffer & Rasmussen, Niels B.K. & Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Gavala, Hariklia N. & Skiadas, Ioannis V., 2021. "Scale up study of a thermophilic trickle bed reactor performing syngas biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Piazzi, Stefano & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2022. "Energy and exergy analysis of different biomass gasification coupled to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Haro, Pedro & Johnsson, Filip & Thunman, Henrik, 2016. "Improved syngas processing for enhanced Bio-SNG production: A techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 380-389.
    7. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2023. "Green hydrogen production from decarbonized biomass gasification: An integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Dohee & Kim, Taehyun & Kim, Yungeon & Park, Jinwoo, 2025. "Integration of biomass gasification and water electrolysis: Importance of sweep gas selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    2. Alessia Amato & Konstantina Tsigkou & Alessandro Becci & Francesca Beolchini & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Francesco Ferella, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane vs. Fossil Methane Production and Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Bidart, Christian & Wichert, Martin & Kolb, Gunther & Held, Michael, 2022. "Biogas catalytic methanation for biomethane production as fuel in freight transport - A carbon footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. D’Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Huisingh, Donald & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2021. "A circular economy model based on biomethane: What are the opportunities for the municipality of Rome and beyond?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1660-1672.
    6. Małgorzata Pawłowska & Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Lucjan Pawłowski, 2025. "State and Perspectives of Biomethane Production and Use—A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-43, May.
    7. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Wang, Shuaibing & Lin, Haitao & Abed, Azher M. & Mahariq, Ibrahim & Ayed, Hamdi & Mouldi, Abir & Lin, Zhixiang, 2024. "Life cycle analysis of biowaste-to- biogas/biomethane processes: Cost and environmental assessment of four different biowaste scenarios organic fraction of municipal solid waste and secondary sewage sludge)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    9. Teimouri, Zahra & Abatzoglou, Nicolas & Dalai, Ajay K., 2024. "A novel machine learning framework for designing high-performance catalysts for production of clean liquid fuels through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    10. Amar Naji & Sabrina Guérin Rechdaoui & Elise Jabagi & Carlyne Lacroix & Sam Azimi & Vincent Rocher, 2023. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge with Lignocellulosic Waste: A Study of Performance and Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Zuzana Kapsdorferová & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko & Lisa Holden, 2024. "Perspectives of Electricity Production from Biogas in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Mauro Prestipino & Antonio Piccolo & Maria Francesca Polito & Antonio Galvagno, 2022. "Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Fernandez, Helen Coarita & Buffiere, Pierre & Bayard, Rémy, 2022. "Understanding the role of mechanical pretreatment before anaerobic digestion: Lab-scale investigations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 193-203.
    14. Justyna Górka & Małgorzata Cimochowicz-Rybicka & Dominika Poproch, 2022. "Sludge Management at the Kraków-Płaszów WWTP—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
    15. Dumitru Peni & Marcin Dębowski & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2022. "Influence of the Fertilization Method on the Silphium perfoliatum Biomass Composition and Methane Fermentation Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Duan, Yumin & Wang, Zhi & Ganeshan, Prabakaran & Sar, Taner & Xu, Suyun & Rajendran, Karthik & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang & Taherzadeh, Mohammad J. & A, 2025. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production for sustainable bioeconomy: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    17. Maktabifard, Mojtaba & Al-Hazmi, Hussein E. & Szulc, Paulina & Mousavizadegan, Mohammad & Xu, Xianbao & Zaborowska, Ewa & Li, Xiang & Mąkinia, Jacek, 2023. "Net-zero carbon condition in wastewater treatment plants: A systematic review of mitigation strategies and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    19. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Wang, Jia & Wen, Mengyuan & Ren, Jurong & La, Xinru & Meng, Xianzhi & Yuan, Xiangzhou & Ragauskas, Arthur J. & Jiang, Jianchun, 2024. "Tailoring microwave frequencies for high-efficiency hydrogen production from biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:260:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125028095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.