IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6595-d1239062.html

Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge with Lignocellulosic Waste: A Study of Performance and Limits

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Naji

    (Direction d’Innovation, Service Public de L’assainissement Francilien (SIAAP), 82 Avenue Kléber, 92700 Colombes, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sabrina Guérin Rechdaoui

    (Direction d’Innovation, Service Public de L’assainissement Francilien (SIAAP), 82 Avenue Kléber, 92700 Colombes, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Elise Jabagi

    (Direction d’Innovation, Service Public de L’assainissement Francilien (SIAAP), 82 Avenue Kléber, 92700 Colombes, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Carlyne Lacroix

    (Direction d’Innovation, Service Public de L’assainissement Francilien (SIAAP), 82 Avenue Kléber, 92700 Colombes, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sam Azimi

    (Direction d’Innovation, Service Public de L’assainissement Francilien (SIAAP), 82 Avenue Kléber, 92700 Colombes, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Vincent Rocher

    (Direction d’Innovation, Service Public de L’assainissement Francilien (SIAAP), 82 Avenue Kléber, 92700 Colombes, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The effects of co-digesting sewage sludge (SS) and horse waste (HW), the composition of HW, and the ratio of HW:SS were studied using two semi-continuous digesters of 9.5 L of working volume. These digesters were operated in parallel with the mono-digestion of SS in digester 1 (D1) and the co-digestion of SS and HW in digester 2 (D2). In digester 2, there were two phases of digestion (durations of 40 and 43 weeks, respectively). The composition of HW in the first phase was 85% wheat straw (WS), 14% wood chips (WC), and 1% horse manure (HM), with 99% wheat straw (WS) and 1% horse manure (HM) in the second phase. Variable ratios of HW:SS were studied in the digesters. The co-digestion of sewage sludge (SS) and horse waste (HW) produced more biogas than the mono-digestion of SS alone, with a maximum of 15.8 L·d −1 , compared to 9 L·d −1 at the end of the experiment. When comparing the results obtained in both phases, the production of methane in phase 2 was 18 NmL·g VS −1 higher than in phase 1. This slight increase in methane yield could be linked to the absence of wood chips (WC), which is considered to have a diluting effect on methane production. Therefore, this study shows that an organic loading rate (OLR) of 4.8 kg VS ·m −3 ·d −1 , a ratio of HW:SS of 3, and a composition of HW (99% WS, 1% HM) should be respected in the actual experimental conditions for a well-functioning anaerobic digestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Naji & Sabrina Guérin Rechdaoui & Elise Jabagi & Carlyne Lacroix & Sam Azimi & Vincent Rocher, 2023. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge with Lignocellulosic Waste: A Study of Performance and Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6595-:d:1239062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    2. Anahita Rabii & Saad Aldin & Yaser Dahman & Elsayed Elbeshbishy, 2019. "A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Mao, Chunlan & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2015. "Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 540-555.
    4. Bi, Shaojie & Hong, Xiujie & Yang, Hongzhi & Yu, Xinhui & Fang, Shumei & Bai, Yan & Liu, Jinli & Gao, Yamei & Yan, Lei & Wang, Weidong & Wang, Yanjie, 2020. "Effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 213-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Obianuju Patience Ilo & Mulala Danny Simatele & S’phumelele Lucky Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi Malusi Mkhize & Nagendra Gopinath Prabhu, 2021. "Methodological Approaches to Optimising Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth for Energy Efficiency in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Yermek Abilmazhinov & Kapan Shakerkhan & Vladimir Meshechkin & Yerzhan Shayakhmetov & Nurzhan Nurgaliyev & Anuarbek Suychinov, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for Evaluating the Sustainability of Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    5. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Manthos, Georgios & Dareioti, Margarita & Zagklis, Dimitris & Kornaros, Michael, 2023. "Using biochemical methane potential results for the economic optimization of continuous anaerobic digestion systems: the effect of substrates’ synergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 296-306.
    8. Vasmara, Ciro & Marchetti, Rosa & Carminati, Domenico, 2021. "Wastewater from the production of lactic acid bacteria as feedstock in anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Andersson, Johanna & Helander-Claesson, Jonas & Olsson, Jesper, 2020. "Study on reduced process temperature for energy optimisation in mesophilic digestion: A lab to full-scale study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    10. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Biogas from Agri-Food and Agricultural Waste Can Appreciate Agro-Ecosystem Services: The Case Study of Emilia Romagna Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Kasinath, Archana & Fudala-Ksiazek, Sylwia & Szopinska, Malgorzata & Bylinski, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska-Skwarek, Anna & Luczkiewicz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass in biogas production: Pretreatment and codigestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Ramos-Suárez, J.L. & Ritter, A. & Mata González, J. & Camacho Pérez, A., 2019. "Biogas from animal manure: A sustainable energy opportunity in the Canary Islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 137-150.
    14. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    15. Josipa Pavičić & Karolina Novak Mavar & Vladislav Brkić & Katarina Simon, 2022. "Biogas and Biomethane Production and Usage: Technology Development, Advantages and Challenges in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    17. Lee, Eun Seo & Park, Seon Yeong & Kim, Chang Gyun, 2023. "Feasibility test anaerobically enhancing methane yield under the injection of hydrogen and carbon dioxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 761-768.
    18. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Yan, Chao & Gu, Haiming & Zhao, Hao, 2022. "Quality of gaseous biofuels: Statistical assessment and guidance on production technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Ayobami Orangun & Harjinder Kaur & Raghava R. Kommalapati, 2021. "Batch Anaerobic Co-Digestion and Biochemical Methane Potential Analysis of Goat Manure and Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Sandra Gonzalez-Piedra & Héctor Hernández-García & Juan M. Perez-Morales & Laura Acosta-Domínguez & Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel & Eliseo Hernandez-Martinez, 2021. "A Study on the Feasibility of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Raw Cheese Whey with Coffee Pulp Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6595-:d:1239062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.