IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v205y2023icp695-716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental comparative analysis of different PV technologies performance including the influence of hot-arid climatic parameters: Toward a realistic yield assessment for desert locations

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi, Maryam
  • Ammari, Nabil
  • Alami Merrouni, Ahmed
  • El Gallassi, Hicham
  • Dahmani, Mohamed
  • Ghennioui, Abdellatif

Abstract

In this study, a one-year experiment has been conducted to evaluate the performances of two different photovoltaic technologies: Polycrystalline (pc-Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) under a hot desert climate in Mid-south Morocco. For this reason, two PV modules (from each technology) have been exposed and all electrical parameters were monitored for performance comparison. Also, for a realistic comparison, the impact of the climatic parameters, mainly soiling and temperature were taken into consideration. Results show that both technologies have a good performance with a daily Performance Ratio (PR) close to 1 for the pc-Si and around 0.9 for CdTe, but with superiority of 3.5% to the pc-Si technology. The peak daily energy yields are of 7.51 kWh/kWp and 6.99 kWh/kWp for pc-Si and CdTe respectively, with 7% high production for the pc-Si. Nevertheless, the CdTe is less affected by temperature, where the average PR deviation (between the technologies) is 4.37% for temperature values less than 25 °C and 2.35% for temperatures above 25 °C in favor of the CdTe. Regarding soiling, the CdTe shows high performance in comparison to the pc-Si where the daily Soiling Rate reaches 24.6% and 26.9% for both technologies respectively, which causes a drop in the electricity production of 25.5% for the pc-Si and 23.2% for CdTe technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi, Maryam & Ammari, Nabil & Alami Merrouni, Ahmed & El Gallassi, Hicham & Dahmani, Mohamed & Ghennioui, Abdellatif, 2023. "An experimental comparative analysis of different PV technologies performance including the influence of hot-arid climatic parameters: Toward a realistic yield assessment for desert locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 695-716.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:205:y:2023:i:c:p:695-716
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123000915
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thopil, George Alex & Sachse, Christiaan Eddie & Lalk, Jörg & Thopil, Miriam Sara, 2020. "Techno-economic performance comparison of crystalline and thin film PV panels under varying meteorological conditions: A high solar resource southern hemisphere case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Conceição, Ricardo & González-Aguilar, José & Merrouni, Ahmed Alami & Romero, Manuel, 2022. "Soiling effect in solar energy conversion systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Agata Zdyb & Slawomir Gulkowski, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Four Different Photovoltaic Technologies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Shi, Huiting & Chai, Jian & Lu, Quanying & Zheng, Jiali & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "The impact of China's low-carbon transition on economy, society and energy in 2030 based on CO2 emissions drivers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Hassan Daher, Daha & Gaillard, Léon & Ménézo, Christophe, 2022. "Experimental assessment of long-term performance degradation for a PV power plant operating in a desert maritime climate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 44-55.
    6. Pietruszko, S. M. & Gradzki, M., 2003. "Performance of a grid connected small PV system in Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-2), pages 177-184, January.
    7. Edalati, Saeed & Ameri, Mehran & Iranmanesh, Masoud, 2015. "Comparative performance investigation of mono- and poly-crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules for use in grid-connected photovoltaic systems in dry climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 255-265.
    8. Venkateswari, R. & Sreejith, S., 2019. "Factors influencing the efficiency of photovoltaic system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 376-394.
    9. Teodoro Adrada Guerra & Julio Amador Guerra & Beatriz Orfao Tabernero & Guillermo De la Cruz García, 2017. "Comparative Energy Performance Analysis of Six Primary Photovoltaic Technologies in Madrid (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Janusz Teleszewski & Mirosław Żukowski & Dorota Anna Krawczyk & Antonio Rodero, 2021. "Analysis of the Applicability of the Parabolic Trough Solar Thermal Power Plants in the Locations with a Temperate Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Atsu, Divine & Seres, Istvan & Farkas, Istvan, 2021. "The state of solar PV and performance analysis of different PV technologies grid-connected installations in Hungary," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Bouaichi, Abdellatif & El Amrani, Aumeur & Ouhadou, Malika & Lfakir, Aberrazak & Messaoudi, Choukri, 2020. "In-situ performance and degradation of three different photovoltaic module technologies installed in arid climate of Morocco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Purohit, Ishan & Purohit, Pallav, 2018. "Performance assessment of grid-interactive solar photovoltaic projects under India’s national solar mission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 25-41.
    5. Emmanuel, Michael & Akinyele, Daniel & Rayudu, Ramesh, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of a 10 kWp utility interactive photovoltaic system at Maungaraki school, Wellington, New Zealand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 573-583.
    6. Irene Romero-Fiances & Emilio Muñoz-Cerón & Rafael Espinoza-Paredes & Gustavo Nofuentes & Juan De la Casa, 2019. "Analysis of the Performance of Various PV Module Technologies in Peru," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Usman Mehmood & Salah Kamel & Mokhtar Shouran & Elmazeg Elgamli & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, 2022. "Technical Performance Prediction and Employment Potential of Solar PV Systems in Cold Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Chikh, Madjid & Berkane, Smain & Mahrane, Achour & Sellami, Rabah & Yassaa, Noureddine, 2021. "Performance assessment of a 400 kWp multi- technology photovoltaic grid-connected pilot plant in arid region of Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 488-501.
    9. Ehtisham Lodhi & Fei-Yue Wang & Gang Xiong & Ghulam Ali Mallah & Muhammad Yaqoob Javed & Tariku Sinshaw Tamir & David Wenzhong Gao, 2021. "A Dragonfly Optimization Algorithm for Extracting Maximum Power of Grid-Interfaced PV Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Gaur, Ankita & Tiwari, G.N., 2014. "Performance of a-Si thin film PV modules with and without water flow: An experimental validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 184-191.
    11. Marcin Bukowski & Janusz Majewski & Agnieszka Sobolewska, 2020. "Macroeconomic Electric Energy Production Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels in Single-Family Homes in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Waldemar Izdebski & Katarzyna Kosiorek, 2023. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Possibility of Electricity Production from Small Photovoltaic Installations in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1, January.
    13. AL-Rasheedi, Majed & Gueymard, Christian A. & Al-Khayat, Mohammad & Ismail, Alaa & Lee, Jared A. & Al-Duaj, Hamad, 2020. "Performance evaluation of a utility-scale dual-technology photovoltaic power plant at the Shagaya Renewable Energy Park in Kuwait," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Mariusz T. Sarniak, 2020. "Researches of the Impact of the Nominal Power Ratio and Environmental Conditions on the Efficiency of the Photovoltaic System: A Case Study for Poland in Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Baibhaw Kumar & Gábor Szepesi & Zsolt Čonka & Michal Kolcun & Zsolt Péter & László Berényi & Zoltán Szamosi, 2021. "Trendline Assessment of Solar Energy Potential in Hungary and Current Scenario of Renewable Energy in the Visegrád Countries for Future Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Sharma, Vikrant & Chandel, S.S., 2013. "Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 753-767.
    17. Bernhard Faessler & Aleksander Bogunović Jakobsen, 2021. "Autonomous Operation of Stationary Battery Energy Storage Systems—Optimal Storage Design and Economic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Edalati, Saeed & Ameri, Mehran & Iranmanesh, Masoud, 2015. "Comparative performance investigation of mono- and poly-crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules for use in grid-connected photovoltaic systems in dry climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 255-265.
    19. Victor Arturo Martinez Lopez & Ugnė Žindžiūtė & Hesan Ziar & Miro Zeman & Olindo Isabella, 2022. "Study on the Effect of Irradiance Variability on the Efficiency of the Perturb-and-Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Pandey, A.K. & Tyagi, V.V. & Selvaraj, Jeyraj A/L & Rahim, N.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2016. "Recent advances in solar photovoltaic systems for emerging trends and advanced applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 859-884.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:205:y:2023:i:c:p:695-716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.