IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v58y2013icp511-518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma, Vikrant
  • Kumar, Arun
  • Sastry, O.S.
  • Chandel, S.S.

Abstract

The site-specific evaluation of a solar photovoltaic technology helps in identifying its suitability for that location. The objective of the present study is to assess the suitability of different PV technologies under Indian climatic conditions. The performance assessment of photovoltaic technology arrays consisting of polycrystalline silicon, hetero-junction with intrinsic thin layer silicon and amorphous single junction silicon is carried out at a test facility at Solar Energy Centre, in India. The energy yield and performance ratio of each technology, are evaluated. The performance of each technology is also predicted using PV system simulation software and compared with the measured performance. A correction to the module efficiency, results in reducing the absolute percentage error between measured and predicted annual energy yield and performance ratio values to 4.89%, 4.94%, 1.16% and 4.34%, 4.93%, 1.88% for p-Si, HIT and a-Si arrays respectively. The performance comparison shows that HIT and a-Si arrays have performed better than p-Si array at this location. The energy yield of a-Si modules is found to be 14% more in summer months and 6% less in winter months in comparison to p-Si modules. The HIT modules are found to produce 4–12% more energy consistently than p-Si modules.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma, Vikrant & Kumar, Arun & Sastry, O.S. & Chandel, S.S., 2013. "Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 511-518.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:58:y:2013:i:c:p:511-518
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213004994
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rehman, Shafiqur & El-Amin, Ibrahim, 2012. "Performance evaluation of an off-grid photovoltaic system in Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 451-458.
    2. Makrides, George & Zinsser, Bastian & Phinikarides, Alexander & Schubert, Markus & Georghiou, George E., 2012. "Temperature and thermal annealing effects on different photovoltaic technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 407-417.
    3. Raugei, Marco & Bargigli, Silvia & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2007. "Life cycle assessment and energy pay-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules: CdTe and CIS compared to poly-Si," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1310-1318.
    4. Makrides, George & Zinsser, Bastian & Norton, Matthew & Georghiou, George E. & Schubert, Markus & Werner, Jürgen H., 2010. "Potential of photovoltaic systems in countries with high solar irradiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 754-762, February.
    5. Singh, G.K., 2013. "Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Sasitharanuwat, Achitpon & Rakwichian, Wattanapong & Ketjoy, Nipon & Yammen, Suchart, 2007. "Performance evaluation of a 10kWp PV power system prototype for isolated building in Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1288-1300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cañete, Cristina & Carretero, Jesús & Sidrach-de-Cardona, Mariano, 2014. "Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 295-302.
    2. Tholkappiyan Ramachandran & Abdel-Hamid I. Mourad & Fathalla Hamed, 2022. "A Review on Solar Energy Utilization and Projects: Development in and around the UAE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Pandey, A.K. & Tyagi, V.V. & Selvaraj, Jeyraj A/L & Rahim, N.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2016. "Recent advances in solar photovoltaic systems for emerging trends and advanced applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 859-884.
    4. Kumar, Manish & Kumar, Arun, 2017. "Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-587.
    5. Adar, Mustapha & Najih, Youssef & Gouskir, Mohamed & Chebak, Ahmed & Mabrouki, Mustapha & Bennouna, Amin, 2020. "Three PV plants performance analysis using the principal component analysis method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Li, Guiqiang & Xuan, Qingdong & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Lu, Yashun & Ji, Jie, 2018. "Life-cycle assessment of a low-concentration PV module for building south wall integration in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 174-185.
    7. Núria Sánchez-Pantoja & Rosario Vidal & M. Carmen Pastor, 2021. "EU-Funded Projects with Actual Implementation of Renewable Energies in Cities. Analysis of Their Concern for Aesthetic Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Elibol, Erdem & Özmen, Özge Tüzün & Tutkun, Nedim & Köysal, Oğuz, 2017. "Outdoor performance analysis of different PV panel types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 651-661.
    9. Akinyele, Daniel O. & Rayudu, Ramesh K., 2016. "Techno-economic and life cycle environmental performance analyses of a solar photovoltaic microgrid system for developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 160-179.
    10. Teodoro Adrada Guerra & Julio Amador Guerra & Beatriz Orfao Tabernero & Guillermo De la Cruz García, 2017. "Comparative Energy Performance Analysis of Six Primary Photovoltaic Technologies in Madrid (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Kaldellis, John K. & Kapsali, Marina & Kavadias, Kosmas A., 2014. "Temperature and wind speed impact on the efficiency of PV installations. Experience obtained from outdoor measurements in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 612-624.
    12. Daniel Akinyele & Juri Belikov & Yoash Levron, 2018. "Challenges of Microgrids in Remote Communities: A STEEP Model Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-35, February.
    13. Nixon, J.D. & Bhargava, K. & Halford, A. & Gaura, E., 2021. "Analysis of standalone solar streetlights for improved energy access in displaced settlements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 895-914.
    14. Belsky, A.A. & Glukhanich, D.Y. & Carrizosa, M.J. & Starshaia, V.V., 2022. "Analysis of specifications of solar photovoltaic panels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Rehman, Shafiqur & El-Amin, Ibrahim, 2012. "Performance evaluation of an off-grid photovoltaic system in Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 451-458.
    16. Tsai, Bi-Huei & Chang, Chih-Jen & Chang, Chun-Hsien, 2016. "Elucidating the consumption and CO2 emissions of fossil fuels and low-carbon energy in the United States using Lotka–Volterra models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 416-424.
    17. Jānis Krūmiņš & Māris Kļaviņš, 2023. "Investigating the Potential of Nuclear Energy in Achieving a Carbon-Free Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, April.
    18. Chu, Yinghao & Li, Mengying & Coimbra, Carlos F.M., 2016. "Sun-tracking imaging system for intra-hour DNI forecasts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 792-799.
    19. Trujillo, C.L. & Santamaría, F. & Gaona, E.E., 2016. "Modeling and testing of two-stage grid-connected photovoltaic micro-inverters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 533-542.
    20. Guo, Siyu & Walsh, Timothy Michael & Peters, Marius, 2013. "Vertically mounted bifacial photovoltaic modules: A global analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 447-454.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:58:y:2013:i:c:p:511-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.