IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v141y2019icp1117-1126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamics and LCA analysis of biomass supercritical water gasification system using external recycle of liquid residual

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Cui
  • Jin, Hui
  • Peng, Pai
  • Chen, Jia

Abstract

Biomass supercritical water gasification is clean and renewable, which can convert biomass into hydrogen rich gas. Previous studies indicated that external recycle of liquid residual could improve gas yield and gasification efficiency. However, the influence mechanism of external recycle on energy and exergy efficiency is complicated and theoretical model for system optimization is insufficient. Thermodynamic model of external recycle of liquid residual was built in this paper. Exergy efficiency of the main components and exergy loss distribution were specified and the result showed that exergy loss of reactor and preheater accounted for 26.06% and 35.88% of the total exergy loss, which were the main exergy loss sources. Effective ways to reduce exergy loss of components with large exergy loss and to improve energy and exergy efficiency of the system were proposed. Moreover, life cycle assessment of biomass gasification process was carried out. The results indicated that the increase of gasification temperature, pressure and external recycle flow rate of liquid residual and decrease of biomass concentration could improve energy and exergy efficiency of the system. Energy and exergy efficiency reached 63.67% and 48.29% respectively at the condition of gasification temperature of 560 °C, pressure of 25 MPa, recycle flow ratio of 32.43%, biomass concentration of 2.78%. Besides, the increase of gasification temperature and decrease of biomass slurry concentration and pressure could decrease GWP.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Cui & Jin, Hui & Peng, Pai & Chen, Jia, 2019. "Thermodynamics and LCA analysis of biomass supercritical water gasification system using external recycle of liquid residual," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1117-1126.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:141:y:2019:i:c:p:1117-1126
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119304434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karamarkovic, Rade & Karamarkovic, Vladan, 2010. "Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 537-549.
    2. Jia, Junxi & Shu, Lingyun & Zang, Guiyan & Xu, Lijun & Abudula, Abuliti & Ge, Kun, 2018. "Energy analysis and techno-economic assessment of a co-gasification of woody biomass and animal manure, solid oxide fuel cells and micro gas turbine hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 750-761.
    3. Rivero, R. & Garfias, M., 2006. "Standard chemical exergy of elements updated," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3310-3326.
    4. Chen, Xue & Wang, Fuqiang & Yan, Xuewei & Han, Yafen & Cheng, Ziming & Jie, Zhu, 2018. "Thermochemical performance of solar driven CO2 reforming of methane in volumetric reactor with gradual foam structure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 545-555.
    5. Edgar Gasafi & Lutz Meyer & Liselotte Schebek, 2003. "Using Life‐Cycle Assessment in Process Design," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(3‐4), pages 75-91, July.
    6. Midilli, A. & Ay, M. & Dincer, I. & Rosen, M. A., 2005. "On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies: I: current status and needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 255-271, June.
    7. Bai, Bin & Liu, Yigang & Wang, Qiuxia & Zou, Jian & Zhang, Hua & Jin, Hui & Li, Xianwen, 2019. "Experimental investigation on gasification characteristics of plastic wastes in supercritical water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 32-40.
    8. Jin, Hui & Wang, Huibo & Wu, Zhenqun & Ren, Zhenhua & Ou, Zhisong, 2019. "Numerical investigation on drag coefficient and flow characteristics of two biomass spherical particles in supercritical water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 11-17.
    9. Momirlan, M. & Veziroglu, T. N., 2002. "Current status of hydrogen energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(1-2), pages 141-179.
    10. Cao, Changqing & Guo, Liejin & Jin, Hui & Cao, Wen & Jia, Yi & Yao, Xiangdong, 2017. "System analysis of pulping process coupled with supercritical water gasification of black liquor for combined hydrogen, heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 238-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Zhenqun & Ou, Guobiao & Ren, Yifei & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2020. "Particle-resolved numerical study of the forced convection heat transfer characteristics of an endothermic-biomass particle placed in supercritical water crossflow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 271-279.
    2. Guo, Shenghui & Meng, Fanrui & Peng, Pai & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of the superiority of the direct mass transfer design in the supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    3. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Peng, Zhiyong & Xu, Jialing & Rong, Siqi & Luo, Kui & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Zhao, Qiuyang & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic and environmental analysis for multi-component supercritical thermal fluid generation by supercritical water gasification of oilfield wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Qi, Xingang & Chen, Yunan & Zhao, Jiuyun & Su, Di & Liu, Fan & Lu, Libo & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic and environmental assessment of black liquor supercritical water gasification integrated online salt recovery polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    7. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Järvinen, Mika, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of Kraft black liquor: Process design, analysis, pulp mill integration and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Wang, Yu & Ren, Changyifan & Guo, Shenghui & Liu, Shi & Du, Mingming & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic and environmental analysis of heat supply in pig manure supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    2. Yilmaz, Fatih & Balta, M. Tolga & Selbaş, Reşat, 2016. "A review of solar based hydrogen production methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 171-178.
    3. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    4. Liu, P.F. & Chu, J.K. & Hou, S.J. & Xu, P. & Zheng, J.Y., 2012. "Numerical simulation and optimal design for composite high-pressure hydrogen storage vessel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1817-1827.
    5. Nasir Uddin, Md. & Daud, W.M.A. Wan & Abbas, Hazim F., 2013. "Potential hydrogen and non-condensable gases production from biomass pyrolysis: Insights into the process variables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 204-224.
    6. Mirza, Umar K. & Ahmad, Nasir & Harijan, Khanji & Majeed, Tariq, 2009. "A vision for hydrogen economy in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 1111-1115, June.
    7. Fayaz, H. & Saidur, R. & Razali, N. & Anuar, F.S. & Saleman, A.R. & Islam, M.R., 2012. "An overview of hydrogen as a vehicle fuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5511-5528.
    8. Hosseinzadeh, Saman & Fattahi, Abolfazl & Sadeghi, Sadegh & Rahmani, Ebrahim & Bidabadi, Mehdi & Zarei, Fatemeh & Xu, Fei, 2020. "Mathematical analysis of steady-state non-premixed multi-zone combustion of porous biomass particles under counter-flow configuration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 705-725.
    9. Midilli, Adnan & Dincer, Ibrahim & Ay, Murat, 2006. "Green energy strategies for sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3623-3633, December.
    10. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Zhao, Hao & Shen, Laihong, 2012. "A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-173.
    11. Hassan, I.A. & Ramadan, Haitham S. & Saleh, Mohamed A. & Hissel, Daniel, 2021. "Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: Review, analysis and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Huang, Jijiang & Veksha, Andrei & Chan, Wei Ping & Giannis, Apostolos & Lisak, Grzegorz, 2022. "Chemical recycling of plastic waste for sustainable material management: A prospective review on catalysts and processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Kothari, Richa & Singh, D.P. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2012. "Fermentative hydrogen production – An alternative clean energy source," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2337-2346.
    14. Adrian K. James & Ronald W. Thring & Steve Helle & Harpuneet S. Ghuman, 2012. "Ash Management Review—Applications of Biomass Bottom Ash," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    16. Keramiotis, Ch. & Vourliotakis, G. & Skevis, G. & Founti, M.A. & Esarte, C. & Sánchez, N.E. & Millera, A. & Bilbao, R. & Alzueta, M.U., 2012. "Experimental and computational study of methane mixtures pyrolysis in a flow reactor under atmospheric pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 103-110.
    17. Lu, J.F. & Dong, Y.X. & Wang, Y.R. & Wang, W.L. & Ding, J., 2022. "High efficient thermochemical energy storage of methane reforming with carbon dioxide in cavity reactor with novel catalyst bed under concentrated sun simulator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 361-371.
    18. Julius Akinbomi & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2015. "Evaluation of Fermentative Hydrogen Production from Single and Mixed Fruit Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    20. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Zhang, Xiaosong & Chen, Yi & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Assessment of a combined cooling, heating and power system by synthetic use of biogas and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 922-935.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:141:y:2019:i:c:p:1117-1126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.