IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v138y2019icp1127-1133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysates of Agave salmiana leaves comparing S. cerevisiae and K. marxianus

Author

Listed:
  • Láinez, Magdiel
  • Ruiz, Héctor A.
  • Arellano-Plaza, Melchor
  • Martínez-Hernández, Sergio

Abstract

This work reports an improved process of enzymatic saccharification on Agave salmiana leaves and its conversion into bioethanol comparing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanol RED and Kluyveromyces marxianus OFF1. A. salmiana leaves were pretreated with acid-alkaline sequential process before the application of several treatments of enzymatic saccharification. In the results, the best enzymatic treatment reached conversion of 94.49%, releasing sugar concentrations of 50 g L−1. During fermentation, glucose consumption efficiencies were similar for both strains with values of 98%, while the consumption rates were higher for S. cerevisiae. Fermentative efficiencies were higher for K. marxianus with values of 92.88 ± 3.24% while for S. cerevisiae they were 87.63 ± 2.23%. These findings show a saccharification enzymatic process efficiently applied on A. salmiana leaves. K. marxianus, a non-Saccharomyces strain, converted all the sugars released from this plant structure into bioethanol with similar values or even higher than a Saccharomyces strain.

Suggested Citation

  • Láinez, Magdiel & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Arellano-Plaza, Melchor & Martínez-Hernández, Sergio, 2019. "Bioethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysates of Agave salmiana leaves comparing S. cerevisiae and K. marxianus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1127-1133.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:1127-1133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119302125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    2. Caspeta, Luis & Caro-Bermúdez, Mario A. & Ponce-Noyola, Teresa & Martinez, Alfredo, 2014. "Enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings for the conversion of agave bagasse to fuel ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 277-286.
    3. Lorena Amaya-Delgado & Guillermo Flores-Cosio & Dania Sandoval-Nunez & Melchor Arellano-Plaza & Javier Arrizon & Anne Gschaedler, 2018. "Comparative of Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Chapters, in: Ebubekir Yuksel & Abdulkerim Gok & Murat Eyvaz (ed.), Special Topics in Renewable Energy Systems, IntechOpen.
    4. Sukumaran, Rajeev K. & Singhania, Reeta Rani & Mathew, Gincy Marina & Pandey, Ashok, 2009. "Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its application in lignocellulose saccharification for bio-ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 421-424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Amador Honorato-Salazar & Jorge Aburto & Myriam Adela Amezcua-Allieri, 2021. "Agave and Opuntia Species as Sustainable Feedstocks for Bioenergy and Byproducts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Hashemi, Seyed Sajad & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosro, 2020. "Biorefinery development based on whole safflower plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 399-408.
    3. Chohan, Naseeha A. & Aruwajoye, G.S. & Sewsynker-Sukai, Y. & Gueguim Kana, E.B., 2020. "Valorisation of potato peel wastes for bioethanol production using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: Process optimization and kinetic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1031-1040.
    4. Avchar, Rameshwar & Lanjekar, Vikram & Kshirsagar, Pranav & Dhakephalkar, Prashant K. & Dagar, Sumit Singh & Baghela, Abhishek, 2021. "Buffalo rumen harbours diverse thermotolerant yeasts capable of producing second-generation bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 795-807.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen-Tsu Wang, 2016. "Integrating grey sequencing with the genetic algorithm--immune algorithm to optimise touch panel cover glass polishing process parameter design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4882-4893, August.
    2. Radhakumari, Muktham & Taha, Mohamed & Shahsavari, Esmaeil & Bhargava, Suresh K. & Satyavathi, Bankupalli & Ball, Andrew S., 2017. "Pongamia pinnata seed residue – A low cost inedible resource for on-site/in-house lignocellulases and sustainable ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 682-687.
    3. Lopes, Verônica dos Santos & Fischer, Janaína & Pinheiro, Tais Magalhães Abrantes & Cabral, Bruna Vieira & Cardoso, Vicelma Luiz & Coutinho Filho, Ubirajara, 2017. "Biosurfactant and ethanol co-production using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae co-cultures and exploded sugarcane bagasse," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 305-310.
    4. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Qin, Caiyan & Kim, Joong Bae & Lee, Bong Jae, 2019. "Performance analysis of a direct-absorption parabolic-trough solar collector using plasmonic nanofluids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 24-33.
    6. Kaushik, Lav Kumar & Muthukumar, P., 2020. "Thermal and economic performance assessments of waste cooking oil /kerosene blend operated pressure cook-stove with porous radiant burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Yaman, Hayri & Yesilyurt, Murat Kadir & Uslu, Samet, 2022. "Simultaneous optimization of multiple engine parameters of a 1-heptanol / gasoline fuel blends operated a port-fuel injection spark-ignition engine using response surface methodology approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    8. Visva Bharati Barua & Mariya Munir, 2021. "A Review on Synchronous Microalgal Lipid Enhancement and Wastewater Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    10. D. M. D. Rasika & Janak K. Vidanarachchi & Selma F. Luiz & Denise Rosane Perdomo Azeredo & Adriano G. Cruz & Chaminda Senaka Ranadheera, 2021. "Probiotic Delivery through Non-Dairy Plant-Based Food Matrices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, June.
    11. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Muhammad, Gul & Potchamyou Ngatcha, Ange Douglas & Lv, Yongkun & Xiong, Wenlong & El-Badry, Yaser A. & Asmatulu, Eylem & Xu, Jingliang & Alam, Md Asraful, 2022. "Enhanced biodiesel production from wet microalgae biomass optimized via response surface methodology and artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 753-764.
    13. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    14. Chamberlin Stéphane Azebaze Mboving & Zbigniew Hanzelka & Andrzej Firlit, 2022. "Analysis of the Factors Having an Influence on the LC Passive Harmonic Filter Work Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-51, March.
    15. Lu Chen & Qincheng Chen & Pinhua Rao & Lili Yan & Alghashm Shakib & Guoqing Shen, 2018. "Formulating and Optimizing a Novel Biochar-Based Fertilizer for Simultaneous Slow-Release of Nitrogen and Immobilization of Cadmium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Biranchi Panda & K. Shankhwar & Akhil Garg & M. M. Savalani, 2019. "Evaluation of genetic programming-based models for simulating bead dimensions in wire and arc additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 809-820, February.
    17. Hasheminasab, M. & Kermani, M.J. & Nourazar, S.S. & Khodsiani, M.H., 2020. "A novel experimental based statistical study for water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Zahedi, Ali Reza & Mirnezami, Seyed Abolfazl, 2020. "Experimental analysis of biomass to biodiesel conversion using a novel renewable combined cycle system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1177-1194.
    19. Ahmad Abbaszadeh-Mayvan & Barat Ghobadian & Gholamhassan Najafi & Talal Yusaf, 2018. "Intensification of Continuous Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oils Using Shockwave Power Reactor: Process Evaluation and Optimization through Response Surface Methodology (RSM)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Walid Yeddes & Ines Ouerghemmi & Majdi Hammami & Hamza Gadhoumi & Taycir Grati Affes & Salma Nait Mohamed & Wissem Aidi-Wannes & Dorota Witrowa-Rajchert & Moufida Saidani-Tounsi & Małgorzata Nowacka, 2022. "Optimizing the Method of Rosemary Essential Oils Extraction by Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)-Characterization and Toxicological Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:138:y:2019:i:c:p:1127-1133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.