IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v131y2019icp713-729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative 2D and 3D analysis on the hydrodynamics behaviour during biomass gasification in a pilot-scale fluidized bed reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Cardoso, João
  • Silva, Valter
  • Eusébio, Daniela
  • Brito, Paulo
  • Boloy, Ronney Mancebo
  • Tarelho, Luís
  • Silveira, José Luz

Abstract

2D and 3D simulations were carried out to predict the whole gasification process behaviour in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Special concern for the complex hydrodynamics phenomena within the fluidized bed was undertaken. The implemented multiphase Eulerian-Eulerian mathematical model was validated by comparison to experimental gasification runs and fluidization curves gathered from the pilot-scale fluidized bed. Appropriate 2D and 3D computational domains were achieved by applying a mesh sensitivity study. Solids distribution within the fluidized bed, mixing and segregation phenomena and binary mixture heat transfer were comparatively studied for both configurations. 3D simulations showed improved predicting performance with the experimental results. Also, 3D simulations presented improved segregation degree, while 2D simulations showed improved mixing index, alongside with a tendency to underestimate the reactor heat transfer behaviour. Main findings point to a general good agreement with some close resemblances in the solids distribution between the 2D and 3D simulations whenever quantitative values were considered, while in absolute terms larger discrepancies were seen. The bed expansion was misrepresented at higher superficial gas velocities to a great extent by the 2D configuration. Moreover, it was found that higher superficial gas velocity will induce higher differences between both configurations. Lastly, both configurations successfully described the general tendencies, however, 2D simulations are appropriate every time accuracy is not demanding, whereas 3D simulations should be considered for accurate predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cardoso, João & Silva, Valter & Eusébio, Daniela & Brito, Paulo & Boloy, Ronney Mancebo & Tarelho, Luís & Silveira, José Luz, 2019. "Comparative 2D and 3D analysis on the hydrodynamics behaviour during biomass gasification in a pilot-scale fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 713-729.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:713-729
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118308772
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laslett, Dean & Carter, Craig & Creagh, Chris & Jennings, Philip, 2017. "A large-scale renewable electricity supply system by 2030: Solar, wind, energy efficiency, storage and inertia for the South West Interconnected System (SWIS) in Western Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 713-731.
    2. Saidur, R. & Abdelaziz, E.A. & Demirbas, A. & Hossain, M.S. & Mekhilef, S., 2011. "A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2262-2289, June.
    3. Das, Mithun & Sarkar, Mouktik & Datta, Amitava & Santra, Apurba Kumar, 2018. "An experimental study on the combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with diesel-castor oil biodiesel blends," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 174-184.
    4. Couto, Nuno & Silva, Valter & Monteiro, Eliseu & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2015. "Using an Eulerian-granular 2-D multiphase CFD model to simulate oxygen air enriched gasification of agroindustrial residues," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 174-181.
    5. João Cardoso & Valter Silva & Daniela Eusébio & Paulo Brito, 2017. "Hydrodynamic Modelling of Municipal Solid Waste Residues in a Pilot Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Couto, Nuno & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2016. "Municipal solid waste gasification in semi-industrial conditions using air-CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 42-52.
    7. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 23-43.
    8. Watt, G.D., 2014. "A new future for carbohydrate fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 99-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & El-Salam, M. Abd & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Parametric studies in the gasification agent and fluidization velocity during oxygen-enriched gasification of biomass in a pilot-scale fluidized bed: Experimental and numerical assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2429-2439.
    2. Thoharudin, & Hsiau, Shu-San & Chen, Yi-Shun & Yang, Shouyin, 2023. "Design optimization of fluidized bed pyrolysis for energy and exergy analysis using a simplified comprehensive multistep kinetic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Chavando, José Antonio Mayoral & Silva, Valter Bruno & Tarelho, Luís A.C. & Cardoso, João Sousa & Eusébio, Daniela, 2022. "Snapshot review of refuse-derived fuels," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Ullah, Atta & Hong, Kun & Gao, Yanan & Gungor, Afsin & Zaman, Muhammad, 2019. "An overview of Eulerian CFD modeling and simulation of non-spherical biomass particles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1054-1066.
    5. Zhou, Tao & Yang, Shiliang & Wei, Yonggang & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Impact of wide particle size distribution on the gasification performance of biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 534-547.
    6. Kartal, Furkan & Özveren, Uğur, 2020. "A deep learning approach for prediction of syngas lower heating value from CFB gasifier in Aspen plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Yang, Shiliang & Dong, Ruihan & Du, Yanxiang & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Hua, 2021. "Numerical study of the biomass pyrolysis process in a spouted bed reactor through computational fluid dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Yang, Shiliang & Fan, Feihu & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Particle-scale evaluation of the biomass steam-gasification process in a conical spouted bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 844-860.
    9. Du, Shaohua & Yuan, Shouzheng & Zhou, Qiang, 2021. "Numerical investigation of co-gasification of coal and PET in a fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 424-439.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cardoso, J. & Silva, V. & Eusébio, D. & Brito, P. & Hall, M.J. & Tarelho, L., 2018. "Comparative scaling analysis of two different sized pilot-scale fluidized bed reactors operating with biomass substrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 520-535.
    2. Gao, Xiaoyan & Xu, Fei & Bao, Fubing & Tu, Chengxu & Zhang, Yaning & Wang, Yingying & Yang, Yang & Li, Bingxi, 2019. "Simulation and optimization of rice husk gasification using intrinsic reaction rate based CFD model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 611-620.
    3. João Cardoso & Valter Silva & Daniela Eusébio & Paulo Brito, 2017. "Hydrodynamic Modelling of Municipal Solid Waste Residues in a Pilot Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    5. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Małgorzata Wzorek & Robert Junga & Ersel Yilmaz & Bohdan Bozhenko, 2021. "Thermal Decomposition of Olive-Mill Byproducts: A TG-FTIR Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Fernando Rueda-Martinez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2020. "Zapote Seed ( Pouteria mammosa L. ) Valorization for Thermal Energy Generation in Tropical Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    10. Kütt, Lauri & Millar, John & Karttunen, Antti & Lehtonen, Matti & Karppinen, Maarit, 2018. "Thermoelectric applications for energy harvesting in domestic applications and micro-production units. Part I: Thermoelectric concepts, domestic boilers and biomass stoves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 519-544.
    11. Carmen de la Cruz-Lovera & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Esther Salmerón-Manzano & José-Luis de la Cruz-Fernández & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2019. "Date Seeds ( Phoenix dactylifera L. ) Valorization for Boilers in the Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    13. Manolis, E.N. & Zagas, T.D. & Karetsos, G.K. & Poravou, C.A., 2019. "Ecological restrictions in forest biomass extraction for a sustainable renewable energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 290-297.
    14. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    16. Silva, D.A.L. & Filleti, R.A.P. & Musule, R. & Matheus, T.T. & Freire, F., 2022. "A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Xuejun Qian & Jingwen Xue & Yulai Yang & Seong W. Lee, 2021. "Thermal Properties and Combustion-Related Problems Prediction of Agricultural Crop Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Vincent Bertrand, 2013. "Switching to biomass co-firing in European coal power plants: Estimating the biomass and CO2 breakeven prices," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1535-1546.
    19. Bello, Yusuf H. & Ahmed, Mahmoud A. & Ookawara, Shinichi & Elwardany, Ahmed E., 2022. "Numerical and experimental investigation on air distributor design of fluidized bed reactor of sawdust pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    20. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:713-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.