IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v109y2017icp346-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of biogas potential of anaerobic digesters using rumen fungi

Author

Listed:
  • Yıldırım, Elif
  • Ince, Orhan
  • Aydin, Sevcan
  • Ince, Bahar

Abstract

Cellulosic compounds in manure limit the hydrolysis step in energy production from animal waste under anaerobic conditions. Because anaerobic fungi produce plant carbohydrate hydrolysing, cellulolytic, hemicellulolytic, glycolytic, and proteolytic enzymes, they are considerably important for the biodegradation of animal manure. In this study, we examined the effects of bioaugmentation of anaerobic rumen fungi in various ratios of inoculums on biogas production of anaerobic digesters fed with animal manure. The highest biogas production was observed in the R2 (15%) digester with a rate of 5500 mL/d, almost 60% of total biogas, due to addition of anaerobic rumen fungi. In addition, changes in the microbial community structure were detected by next-generation sequencing. It was also proven that anaerobic rumen fungi are more effective on Lentisphaerae, Clostridium, and Methanolinea sp. in terms of the highest biogas production. Based on our results, anaerobic rumen fungi appear to be a promising alternative for improving biogas production from different types of lignocellulosic compounds due to their non-specific extracellular ligninolytic enzymatic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yıldırım, Elif & Ince, Orhan & Aydin, Sevcan & Ince, Bahar, 2017. "Improvement of biogas potential of anaerobic digesters using rumen fungi," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 346-353.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:346-353
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148117302021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellabban, Omar & Abu-Rub, Haitham & Blaabjerg, Frede, 2014. "Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 748-764.
    2. Goldemberg, Jose & Teixeira Coelho, Suani, 2004. "Renewable energy--traditional biomass vs. modern biomass," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 711-714, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Liu, Zhidan & Mohammadi, Ali & Angelidaki, Irini & Tsang, Daniel CW. & Zhang, Zengqiang & Pan, Junting & Ma, Lin & Ag, 2021. "A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    3. Bücker, Francielle & Marder, Munique & Peiter, Marina Regina & Lehn, Daniel Neutzling & Esquerdo, Vanessa Mendonça & Antonio de Almeida Pinto, Luiz & Konrad, Odorico, 2020. "Fish waste: An efficient alternative to biogas and methane production in an anaerobic mono-digestion system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 798-805.
    4. Li, Yu & Achinas, Spyridon & Zhao, Jing & Geurkink, Bert & Krooneman, Janneke & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Co-digestion of cow and sheep manure: Performance evaluation and relative microbial activity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 553-563.
    5. Ipsakis, Dimitris & Kraia, Tzouliana & Konsolakis, Michalis & Marnellos, George, 2018. "Remediation of Black Sea ecosystem and pure H2 generation via H2S-H2O co-electrolysis in a proton-conducting membrane cell stack reactor: A feasibility study of the integrated and autonomous approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 806-818.
    6. Mariana Ferdeș & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă & Gigel Paraschiv, 2020. "Microorganisms and Enzymes Used in the Biological Pretreatment of the Substrate to Enhance Biogas Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Isabela Gomes Barreto da Motta & Larice Aparecida Rezende Santana & Hyago Passe Pereira & Vanessa Romário de Paula & Marta Fonseca Martins & Jailton da Costa Carneiro & Marcelo Henrique Otenio, 2022. "Population Dynamics of Methanogenic Archea in Co-Digestion Systems Operating Different Industrial Residues for Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sales-Setién, Ester & Peñarrocha-Alós, Ignacio, 2020. "Robust estimation and diagnosis of wind turbine pitch misalignments at a wind farm level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1746-1765.
    2. Xinxin Liu & Nan Li & Feng Liu & Hailin Mu & Longxi Li & Xiaoyu Liu, 2021. "Optimal Design on Fossil-to-Renewable Energy Transition of Regional Integrated Energy Systems under CO 2 Emission Abatement Control: A Case Study in Dalian, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Francisco José Sepúlveda & María Teresa Miranda & Irene Montero & José Ignacio Arranz & Francisco Javier Lozano & Manuel Matamoros & Paloma Rodríguez, 2019. "Analysis of Potential Use of Linear Fresnel Collector for Direct Steam Generation in Industries of the Southwest of Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    5. Rahim Zahedi & Reza Eskandarpanah & Mohammadhossein Akbari & Nima Rezaei & Paniz Mazloumin & Omid Noudeh Farahani, 2022. "Development of a New Simulation Model for the Reservoir Hydropower Generation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(7), pages 2241-2256, May.
    6. Li, Peidu & Gao, Xiaoqing & Li, Zhenchao & Ye, Tiange & Zhou, Xiyin, 2022. "Effects of fishery complementary photovoltaic power plant on near-surface meteorology and energy balance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 698-709.
    7. Saleem, Arslan & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2020. "Aerodynamic performance optimization of an airfoil-based airborne wind turbine using genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hou, Fujun & Sinha, Avik, 2018. "¬¬¬¬¬¬From Nonrenewable to Renewable Energy and Its Impact on Economic Growth: Silver Line of Research & Development Expenditures in APEC Countries," MPRA Paper 90611, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Dec 2018.
    9. Field, John L. & Tanger, Paul & Shackley, Simon J. & Haefele, Stephan M., 2016. "Agricultural residue gasification for low-cost, low-carbon decentralized power: An empirical case study in Cambodia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 612-624.
    10. Diego Larrahondo & Ricardo Moreno & Harold R. Chamorro & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt, 2021. "Comparative Performance of Multi-Period ACOPF and Multi-Period DCOPF under High Integration of Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Abel D Alonso & Seng Kok, 2018. "A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach in the context of a region’s international attractiveness: The recent case of Western Australia," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(3), pages 307-328, May.
    12. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    13. Avri Eitan, 2021. "Promoting Renewable Energy to Cope with Climate Change—Policy Discourse in Israel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Zhang, Xiaochun & Ma, Chun & Song, Xia & Zhou, Yuyu & Chen, Weiping, 2016. "The impacts of wind technology advancement on future global energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1033-1037.
    15. Kumar, Vikash, 2021. "Experimental investigation of exergetic efficiency of 3 side concave dimple roughened absorbers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    16. Roesler, Tim & Hassler, Markus, 2019. "Creating niches – The role of policy for the implementation of bioenergy village cooperatives in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 95-101.
    17. Shahryar Jafarinejad & Rebecca R. Hernandez & Sajjad Bigham & Bryan S. Beckingham, 2023. "The Intertwined Renewable Energy–Water–Environment (REWE) Nexus Challenges and Opportunities: A Case Study of California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    19. Oleksandr Korkh & Andrei Blinov & Dmitri Vinnikov & Andrii Chub, 2020. "Review of Isolated Matrix Inverters: Topologies, Modulation Methods and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-30, May.
    20. Ruth M. Saint & Céline Garnier & Francesco Pomponi & John Currie, 2018. "Thermal Performance through Heat Retention in Integrated Collector-Storage Solar Water Heaters: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:346-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.