IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics0951832023007603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis by differential importance measure for unsupervised fault diagnostics

Author

Listed:
  • Floreale, Giovanni
  • Baraldi, Piero
  • Lu, Xuefei
  • Rossetti, Paolo
  • Zio, Enrico

Abstract

Fault diagnostic approaches based on supervised classifiers are difficult to apply to safety-critical or new design systems, because they require the availability of labelled data collected when the systems operate abnormally, which is a rare situation. To address this challenge, we develop a novel unsupervised method for fault diagnostics based on a fault detection module and on sensitivity analysis . Specifically, the Differential Importance Measure (DIM) is originally used to quantify how much a signal is, or a set of signals are, responsible for the variation of the system health state. The proposed method is tested on simulated data from a wind turbine and on real data from a gas turbine. The advantages of the proposed fault diagnostic method are: (1) it can be developed using only normal condition data (2) it allows identifying the component responsible for the abnormality by quantifying the contribution of groups of signals to the variation of the system health state; (3) it is capable of distinguishing the abnormalities caused by changes in external conditions from those caused by components malfunctions; (4) it can be used in combination with any fault detection technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Floreale, Giovanni & Baraldi, Piero & Lu, Xuefei & Rossetti, Paolo & Zio, Enrico, 2024. "Sensitivity analysis by differential importance measure for unsupervised fault diagnostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007603
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023007603
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.