IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v180y2018icp352-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiang-Yu
  • Li, Yan-Feng
  • Huang, Hong-Zhong
  • Zio, Enrico

Abstract

Phased-mission systems (PMSs) are widely used, especially in the aerospace industry. As in the outer space there are many kinds of cosmic rays, such as the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR), randomly hitting on these systems and causing significant impact on the electronics inside or outside the equipment, a reliability model for PMSs considering both finite and infinite random shocks is proposed in this paper. The modularization method is used to simplify the state space model for each phase and reduce the amount of system states, and the Markov regenerative process (MRGP) is used to describe the hybrid components’ lifetime distributions and the dynamic behaviors within the modules. Then, two kinds of scenarios, finite and infinite random shocks effect, are both integrated into the dynamic modules. For demonstration, a phased altitude and orbit control system (AOCS) subjected to infinite random shocks is illustrated to demonstrate the procedure of the proposed Monte Carlo simulation. Thirdly, the evaluated system reliability under infinite random shocks is compared with the same system without considering random shocks. At last, a sensitivity analysis is also provided for completion.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 352-361.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:180:y:2018:i:c:p:352-361
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017305392
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz-Castro, Juan Eloy, 2016. "Markov counting and reward processes for analysing the performance of a complex system subject to random inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 155-168.
    2. Koosha Rafiee & Qianmei Feng & David Coit, 2014. "Reliability modeling for dependent competing failure processes with changing degradation rate," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 483-496.
    3. Li, Xiang-Yu & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Yan-Feng, 2018. "Reliability analysis of phased mission system with non-exponential and partially repairable components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 119-127.
    4. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "BDD-based reliability evaluation of phased-mission systems with internal/external common-cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 145-153.
    5. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2012. "Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with functional dependence in one of phases," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 90-99.
    6. Enrico Zio & Nicola Pedroni, 2010. "Reliability Estimation by Advanced Monte Carlo Simulation," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Javier Faulin & Angel A. Juan & Sebastián Martorell & José-Emmanuel Ramírez-Márquez (ed.), Simulation Methods for Reliability and Availability of Complex Systems, chapter 0, pages 3-39, Springer.
    7. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    8. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2018. "Reliability analysis of complex multi-state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 71-81.
    9. Yan-Feng Li & Jinhua Mi & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Dynamic fault tree analysis based on continuous-time Bayesian networks under fuzzy numbers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 530-541, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Tang, Bo, 2020. "Efficient reliability analysis of dynamic k-out-of-n heterogeneous phased-mission systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Xiaopeng & Feng, Jianxiang & Li, Congming & Xiong, Xiaoyan & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "Reliability analysis and optimization of multi-phased spaceflight with backup missions and mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Qian, Hua-Ming & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2020. "Time-variant reliability analysis for industrial robot RV reducer under multiple failure modes using Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Kan, Cihangir, 2019. "Reliability and optimal replacement policy for an extreme shock model with a change point," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Cheng, Chen & Yang, Jun & Li, Lei, 2021. "Reliability evaluation of a k-out-of-n(G)-subsystem based multi-state phased mission system with common bus performance sharing subjected to common cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Devrim, Yilser, 2019. "Reliability and optimal replacement policy for a k-out-of-n system subject to shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 393-397.
    7. Wang, Zengkai & Zeng, Shengkui & Guo, Jianbin & Che, Haiyang, 2021. "A Bayesian network for reliability assessment of man-machine phased-mission system considering the phase dependencies of human cognitive error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    8. Li, Xiang-Yu & Xiong, Xiaoyan & Guo, Junyu & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Reliability assessment of non-repairable multi-state phased mission systems with backup missions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Zhao, Xian & Wang, Siqi & Wang, Xiaoyue & Fan, Yu, 2020. "Multi-state balanced systems in a shock environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Xiao, Hui & Lin, Chen & Kou, Gang & Peng, Rui, 2022. "Reliability modeling and configuration optimization of a photovoltaic based electric power generation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Cheng, Chen & Yang, Jun & Li, Lei, 2020. "Reliability assessment of multi-state phased mission systems with common bus performance sharing considering transmission loss and performance storage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiang-Yu & Xiong, Xiaoyan & Guo, Junyu & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Reliability assessment of non-repairable multi-state phased mission systems with backup missions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Zhang, Xiaoqiang & Gao, Huiying & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua, 2018. "Dynamic reliability modeling for system analysis under complex load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 345-351.
    3. Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2020. "Redundancy allocation problem of phased-mission system with non-exponential components and mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Zeng, Ying & Huang, Tudi & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "Reliability modeling for power converter in satellite considering periodic phased mission," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    6. Hui Xiao & Minhao Cao & Gang Kou & Xiaojun Yuan, 2021. "Optimal element allocation and sequencing of multi-state series systems with two levels of performance sharing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 282-292, April.
    7. Zheng Liu & Xin Liu & Hong-Zhong Huang & Pingyu Zhu & Zhongwei Liang, 2022. "A new inherent reliability modeling and analysis method based on imprecise Dirichlet model for machine tool spindle," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 295-310, April.
    8. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Ying-Kui Gu & Chao-Jun Fan & Ling-Qiang Liang & Jun Zhang, 2022. "Reliability calculation method based on the Copula function for mechanical systems with dependent failure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 99-116, April.
    10. Junyuan Wang & Jimin Ye & Qianru Ma & Pengfei Xie, 2022. "An extended geometric process repairable model with its repairman having vacation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 401-415, April.
    11. Yan-Feng Li & Hong-Zhong Huang & Jinhua Mi & Weiwen Peng & Xiaomeng Han, 2022. "Reliability analysis of multi-state systems with common cause failures based on Bayesian network and fuzzy probability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 195-209, April.
    12. Tang, Maochun & Xiahou, Tangfan & Liu, Yu, 2023. "Mission performance analysis of phased-mission systems with cross-phase competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Yuan-Jian Yang & Ya-Lan Xiong & Xin-Yin Zhang & Gui-Hua Wang & Bihai Zou, 2022. "Reliability analysis of continuous emission monitoring system with common cause failure based on fuzzy FMECA and Bayesian networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 451-467, April.
    14. Salomon, Julian & Winnewisser, Niklas & Wei, Pengfei & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Efficient reliability analysis of complex systems in consideration of imprecision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Mi, Jinhua & Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Bai, Libing, 2022. "An evidential network-based hierarchical method for system reliability analysis with common cause failures and mixed uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    16. Guang-Jun Jiang & Hong-Xia Chen & Le Gao & Hong-Hua Sun & Qing-Yang Li, 2022. "Reliability analysis on ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosive vehicle pharmaceutical system based on dynamic fault tree and Bayesian network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 167-182, April.
    17. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Xu, Yingchun & Wang, Ning, 2024. "Algorithms for Bayesian network modeling and reliability inference of complex multistate systems with common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Jung, Woo Sik, 2015. "A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 134-142.
    19. Mi, Jinhua & Beer, Michael & Li, Yan-Feng & Broggi, Matteo & Cheng, Yuhua, 2020. "Reliability and importance analysis of uncertain system with common cause failures based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:180:y:2018:i:c:p:352-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.