IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v311y2022i1d10.1007_s10479-019-03211-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of dynamic evidential networks in reliability analysis of complex systems with epistemic uncertainty and multiple life distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Jinhua Mi

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    Center for System Reliability and Safety, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz University Hannover)

  • Yuhua Cheng

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Yufei Song

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Libing Bai

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

  • Kai Chen

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China)

Abstract

With the modernization and intelligent of industrial equipment and systems, the challenges of dynamic characteristics, failure dependency and uncertainties have aroused by the increasing of system complexity. Besides, various types of components may follow different life distributions which bring the multiple life distributions problem in systems. In order to model the impact of time dependency and epistemic uncertainty on the failure behavior of system, this paper combines the flexible dynamic modeling with the uncertainty expression. Its advantages are intuitively graphical representation and reasoning that brought by evidential network (EN). After that, the discrete time dynamic evidential network (DT-DEN) is introduced to analyze the reliability of complex systems, and the network inference mechanism is clearly defined. The evidence theory and original definition and inference mechanism of conventional EN is firstly recommended, and the DT-DEN is further presented. Furthermore, the multiple life distributions are synthesized into the DT-DEN to tackle the epistemic uncertainty and mixed life distribution challenges. Specifically, the dynamic logic gates are converted into equivalent DENs with distinguished conditional mass tables, and then the belief interval of system reliability can be calculated by network forward reasoning. Finally, the availability and efficiency of the proposed method is verified by some numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinhua Mi & Yuhua Cheng & Yufei Song & Libing Bai & Kai Chen, 2022. "Application of dynamic evidential networks in reliability analysis of complex systems with epistemic uncertainty and multiple life distributions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 311-333, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:311:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03211-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03211-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03211-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03211-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    2. Rahman, S. & Karanki, D.R. & Epiney, A. & Wicaksono, D. & Zerkak, O. & Dang, V.N., 2018. "Deterministic sampling for propagating epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in dynamic event tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 62-78.
    3. Simon, Christophe & Bicking, Frédérique, 2017. "Hybrid computation of uncertainty in reliability analysis with p-box and evidential networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 629-638.
    4. Khakzad, Nima & Landucci, Gabriele & Reniers, Genserik, 2017. "Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 232-247.
    5. Alberto Pliego Marugán & Fausto Pedro García Márquez & Benjamin Lev, 2017. "Optimal decision-making via binary decision diagrams for investments under a risky environment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5271-5286, September.
    6. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2018. "Reliability analysis of complex multi-state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 71-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi, Jinhua & Beer, Michael & Li, Yan-Feng & Broggi, Matteo & Cheng, Yuhua, 2020. "Reliability and importance analysis of uncertain system with common cause failures based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Yan-Feng Li & Hong-Zhong Huang & Jinhua Mi & Weiwen Peng & Xiaomeng Han, 2022. "Reliability analysis of multi-state systems with common cause failures based on Bayesian network and fuzzy probability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 195-209, April.
    3. Mi, Jinhua & Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Bai, Libing, 2022. "An evidential network-based hierarchical method for system reliability analysis with common cause failures and mixed uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Song, Yufei & Mi, Jinhua & Cheng, Yuhua & Bai, Libing & Chen, Kai, 2020. "A dependency bounds analysis method for reliability assessment of complex system with hybrid uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Zheng Liu & Xin Liu & Hong-Zhong Huang & Pingyu Zhu & Zhongwei Liang, 2022. "A new inherent reliability modeling and analysis method based on imprecise Dirichlet model for machine tool spindle," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 295-310, April.
    6. Ying-Kui Gu & Chao-Jun Fan & Ling-Qiang Liang & Jun Zhang, 2022. "Reliability calculation method based on the Copula function for mechanical systems with dependent failure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 99-116, April.
    7. Yuan-Jian Yang & Ya-Lan Xiong & Xin-Yin Zhang & Gui-Hua Wang & Bihai Zou, 2022. "Reliability analysis of continuous emission monitoring system with common cause failure based on fuzzy FMECA and Bayesian networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 451-467, April.
    8. Salomon, Julian & Winnewisser, Niklas & Wei, Pengfei & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Efficient reliability analysis of complex systems in consideration of imprecision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Guang-Jun Jiang & Hong-Xia Chen & Le Gao & Hong-Hua Sun & Qing-Yang Li, 2022. "Reliability analysis on ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosive vehicle pharmaceutical system based on dynamic fault tree and Bayesian network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 167-182, April.
    10. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Xu, Yingchun & Wang, Ning, 2024. "Algorithms for Bayesian network modeling and reliability inference of complex multistate systems with common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Li, Xiang-Yu & Xiong, Xiaoyan & Guo, Junyu & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Reliability assessment of non-repairable multi-state phased mission systems with backup missions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 352-361.
    13. Moradi, Ramin & Cofre-Martel, Sergio & Lopez Droguett, Enrique & Modarres, Mohammad & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Integration of deep learning and Bayesian networks for condition and operation risk monitoring of complex engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Yingchun Xu & Xiaohu Zheng & Wen Yao & Ning Wang & Xiaoqian Chen, 2021. "A sequential multi-prior integration and updating method for complex multi-level system based on Bayesian melding method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 863-876, October.
    15. Jie Zhou & Hong-Zhong Huang & Yan-Feng Li & Junyu Guo, 2022. "A framework for fatigue reliability analysis of high-pressure turbine blades," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 489-505, April.
    16. Zeng, Ying & Huang, Tudi & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "Reliability modeling for power converter in satellite considering periodic phased mission," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    17. Zhang, Xiaoqiang & Gao, Huiying & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua, 2018. "Dynamic reliability modeling for system analysis under complex load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 345-351.
    18. Yong-Hua Li & Fu-Yu Zhao & Yue-Hua Gao & Peng-Peng Zhi, 2022. "Importance analysis of underframe connection system for the pantograph lower arm rod," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 211-223, April.
    19. Ning Wang & Zhuo Zhang & Jiao Zhao & Dawei Hu, 2022. "Recognition method of equipment state with the FLDA based Mahalanobis–Taguchi system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 417-435, April.
    20. Qian, Hua-Ming & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2021. "Time-variant system reliability analysis method for a small failure probability problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:311:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03211-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.