IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v174y2018icp71-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability analysis of complex multi-state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks

Author

Listed:
  • Mi, Jinhua
  • Li, Yan-Feng
  • Peng, Weiwen
  • Huang, Hong-Zhong

Abstract

With the increasing complexity and size of modern advanced engineering systems, the traditional reliability theory cannot characterize and quantify the complex characteristics of complex systems, such as multi-state properties, epistemic uncertainties, common cause failures (CCFs). This paper focuses on the reliability analysis of complex multi-state system (MSS) with epistemic uncertainty and CCFs. Based on the Bayesian network (BN) method for reliability analysis of MSS, the Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory is used to express the epistemic uncertainty in system through the state space reconstruction of MSS, and an uncertain state used to express the epistemic uncertainty is introduced in the new state space. The integration of evidence theory with BN which called evidential network (EN) is achieved by adapting and updating the conditional probability tables (CPTs) into conditional mass tables (CMTs). When multiple CCF groups (CCFGs) are considered in complex redundant system, a modified β factor parametric model is introduced to model the CCF in system. An EN method is proposed for the reliability analysis and evaluation of complex MSSs in this paper. The reliability analysis of servo feeding control system for CNC heavy-duty horizontal lathes (HDHLs) by this proposed method has shown that CCFs have considerable impact on system reliability. The presented method has high computational efficiency, and the computational accuracy is also verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2018. "Reliability analysis of complex multi-state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 71-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:174:y:2018:i:c:p:71-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016309553
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Elmakias, David & Laredo, David & Ben Haim, Hanoch, 2012. "A multi-state Markov model for a short-term reliability analysis of a power generating unit," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 1-6.
    2. Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2012. "A multi-state model for the reliability assessment of a distributed generation system via universal generating function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 28-36.
    3. Zhang, Z. & Jiang, C. & Wang, G.G. & Han, X., 2015. "First and second order approximate reliability analysis methods using evidence theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 40-49.
    4. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Gregory Levitin, 2005. "The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-245-4, January.
    6. Simon, C. & Weber, P. & Evsukoff, A., 2008. "Bayesian networks inference algorithm to implement Dempster Shafer theory in reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 950-963.
    7. KanÄ ev, DuÅ¡ko & ÄŒepin, Marko, 2012. "A new method for explicit modelling of single failure event within different common cause failure groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 84-93.
    8. Sankararaman, Shankar & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2011. "Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 814-824.
    9. Jian-Ping Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang & Yu Liu & Yan-Feng Li, 2015. "Quantification Classification Algorithm of Multiple Sources of Evidence," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(05), pages 1017-1034.
    10. Shah, Harsheel & Hosder, Serhat & Winter, Tyler, 2015. "Quantification of margins and mixed uncertainties using evidence theory and stochastic expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 59-72.
    11. Yan-Feng Li & Jinhua Mi & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Dynamic fault tree analysis based on continuous-time Bayesian networks under fuzzy numbers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 530-541, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi, Jinhua & Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Bai, Libing, 2022. "An evidential network-based hierarchical method for system reliability analysis with common cause failures and mixed uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Cao, Yingsai & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Dong, Wenjie, 2020. "Modeling ageing effects for multi-state systems with multiple components subject to competing and dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Tian, Tianzi & Yang, Jun & Li, Lei & Wang, Ning, 2023. "Reliability assessment of performance-based balanced systems with rebalancing mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Peng, Rui & Xiao, Hui & Liu, Hanlin, 2017. "Reliability of multi-state systems with a performance sharing group of limited size," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 164-170.
    5. Wang, Guanjun & Duan, Fengjun & Zhou, Yifan, 2018. "Reliability evaluation of multi-state series systems with performance sharing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 58-63.
    6. Peng, Rui & Mo, Huadong & Xie, Min & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Optimal structure of multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 18-25.
    7. Niu, Yi-Feng & Gao, Zi-You & Lam, William H.K., 2017. "A new efficient algorithm for finding all d-minimal cuts in multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 151-163.
    8. Xiao, Hui & Shi, Daimin & Ding, Yi & Peng, Rui, 2016. "Optimal loading and protection of multi-state systems considering performance sharing mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 88-95.
    9. Fazlollahtabar, Hamed & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Balakrishnan, Jaydeep, 2015. "Integrated Markov-neural reliability computation method: A case for multiple automated guided vehicle system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 34-44.
    10. Jiang, Tao & Liu, Yu, 2017. "Parameter inference for non-repairable multi-state system reliability models by multi-level observation sequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 3-15.
    11. Sarat Sivaprasad & Cameron A. MacKenzie, 2018. "The Hurwicz Decision Rule’s Relationship to Decision Making with the Triangle and Beta Distributions and Exponential Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 139-153, September.
    12. Li, Xiang-Yu & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Reliability assessment of phased-mission systems under random shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 352-361.
    13. Tazi, Nacef & Châtelet, Eric & Bouzidi, Youcef, 2018. "How combined performance and propagation of failure dependencies affect the reliability of a MSS," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 531-541.
    14. Zhang, Xiaoqiang & Gao, Huiying & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua, 2018. "Dynamic reliability modeling for system analysis under complex load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 345-351.
    15. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Ding, Yi, 2016. "Using inverse Lz-transform for obtaining compact stochastic model of complex power station for short-term risk evaluation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 19-27.
    16. Bao, Minglei & Ding, Yi & Yin, Xunhu & Shao, Changzheng & Ye, Chenjin, 2021. "Definitions and Reliability Evaluation of Multi-state Systems Considering State Transition Process and its Application for Gas Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. Niu, Yi-Feng & Song, Yi-Fan & Xu, Xiu-Zhen & Zhao, Xia, 2022. "Efficient reliability computation of a multi-state flow network with cost constraint," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Vlad Stefan Barbu & Nicolas Vergne, 2019. "Reliability and Survival Analysis for Drifting Markov Models: Modeling and Estimation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1407-1429, December.
    19. Shao, Changzheng & Ding, Yi, 2020. "Two-interdependent-performance multi-state system: Definitions and reliability evaluation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:174:y:2018:i:c:p:71-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.