IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v54y2010i10p704-710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realizing CO2 emission reduction through industrial symbiosis: A cement production case study for Kawasaki

Author

Listed:
  • Hashimoto, Shizuka
  • Fujita, Tsuyoshi
  • Geng, Yong
  • Nagasawa, Emiri

Abstract

This article is one effort to examine the present and potential performances of CO2 emission reduction though industrial symbiosis by employing a case study approach and life cycle CO2 analysis for alternative industrial symbiosis scenarios. As one of the first and the best-known eco-town projects, Kawasaki Eco-town was chosen as a case study area. First, the current industrial symbiosis practices in this area are introduced. To evaluate the potential of reducing the total CO2 emission through industrial symbiosis, alternative industrial symbiosis scenarios are then designed based on a questionnaire survey of 57 major local industries, to which 35 companies appropriately responded. The main focus of this paper is to calculate the total CO2 emission for different scenarios by adopting a life cycle CO2 analysis method. We then present recommendations on further improvement with consideration of the local realities. Our findings are that industrial symbiosis practices in Kawasaki Eco-town still have room for improvement in that greenhouse gas emissions can be further reduced and natural resources conserved through effective material exchanges, not only between companies, but also with the surrounding area. To encourage material exchanges between the municipality and industry, the city government should introduce a detailed separation program for garbage collection so that wastes can be effectively reused. In addition, the Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning Law needs amending so that industries can effectively use municipal solid waste in their manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hashimoto, Shizuka & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Nagasawa, Emiri, 2010. "Realizing CO2 emission reduction through industrial symbiosis: A cement production case study for Kawasaki," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 704-710.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:54:y:2010:i:10:p:704-710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909002766
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hendrik G. van Oss & Amy C. Padovani, 2002. "Cement Manufacture and the Environment: Part I: Chemistry and Technology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 6(1), pages 89-105, January.
    2. Dick van Beers & Albena Bossilkov & Glen Corder & Rene van Berkel, 2007. "Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 55-72, January.
    3. Ziȩbik, A. & Stanek, W., 2001. "Forecasting of the energy effects of injecting plastic wastes into the blast furnace in comparison with other auxiliary fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 1159-1173.
    4. Lucas Reijnders, 2007. "The Cement Industry as a Scavenger in Industrial Ecology and the Management of Hazardous Substances," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 15-25, July.
    5. Hendrik G. van Oss & Amy C. Padovani, 2003. "Cement Manufacture and the Environment Part II: Environmental Challenges and Opportunities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(1), pages 93-126, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxi Dai & Steven Day & Donato Masi & Ismail Gölgeci, 2022. "A synthesised framework of eco‐industrial park transformation and stakeholder interaction," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3122-3151, November.
    2. Sun, Lu & Li, Hong & Dong, Liang & Fang, Kai & Ren, Jingzheng & Geng, Yong & Fujii, Minoru & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Zhe, 2017. "Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: A case of Liuzhou city, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 78-88.
    3. Griffiths, Steve & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Foley, Aoife M. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Uratani, Joao M., 2023. "Decarbonizing the cement and concrete industry: A systematic review of socio-technical systems, technological innovations, and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Zhe Liu & Weslynne S. Ashton & Michelle Adams & Qing Wang & Raymond P. Cote & Tony R. Walker & Lu Sun & Peter Lowitt, 2023. "Diversity in financing and implementation pathways for industrial symbiosis across the globe," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 960-978, January.
    5. Ilaria Giannoccaro & Valeria Zaza & Luca Fraccascia, 2023. "Designing regional industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Apulia region," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1475-1514, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Woodward, Rachel & Duffy, Noel, 2011. "Cement and concrete flow analysis in a rapidly expanding economy: Ireland as a case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 448-455.
    2. Azad Rahman & Mohammad G. Rasul & M.M.K. Khan & Subhash C. Sharma, 2017. "Assessment of Energy Performance and Emission Control Using Alternative Fuels in Cement Industry through a Process Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Boughton, Bob, 2007. "Evaluation of shredder residue as cement manufacturing feedstock," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 621-642.
    4. Teresa Annunziata Branca & Barbara Fornai & Valentina Colla & Maria Ilaria Pistelli & Eros Luciano Faraci & Filippo Cirilli & Antonius Johannes Schröder, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis and Energy Efficiency in European Process Industries: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-37, August.
    5. Tian Yang & Changhao Liu & Raymond P. Côté & Jinwen Ye & Weifeng Liu, 2022. "Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    6. Boughton, Bob & Horvath, Arpad, 2006. "Environmental assessment of shredder residue management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-25.
    7. Nuno Cristelo & Jhonathan Rivera & Tiago Miranda & Ana Fernández-Jiménez, 2021. "Stabilisation of a Plastic Soil with Alkali Activated Cements Developed from Industrial Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    9. Sanna, Aimaro & Dri, Marco & Hall, Matthew R. & Maroto-Valer, Mercedes, 2012. "Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) – A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 545-554.
    10. Meredith Fowlie & Mar Reguant & Stephen P. Ryan, 2016. "Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 249-302.
    11. Navia, R. & Rivela, B. & Lorber, K.E. & Méndez, R., 2006. "Recycling contaminated soil as alternative raw material in cement facilities: Life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 339-356.
    12. Du, Shan-Wen & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lucas, John A., 2010. "Pulverized coal burnout in blast furnace simulated by a drop tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 576-581.
    13. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Atmaca, Adem & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2012. "Reducing energy consumption of a raw mill in cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 261-269.
    15. Reijnders, L., 2005. "Disposal, uses and treatments of combustion ashes: a review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 313-336.
    16. Tsiligiannis, Aristeides & Tsiliyannis, Christos, 2020. "Oil refinery sludge and renewable fuel blends as energy sources for the cement industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 55-70.
    17. Ying-Liang Chen & Juu-En Chang & Ming-Sheng Ko, 2017. "Reusing Desulfurization Slag in Cement Clinker Production and the Influence on the Formation of Clinker Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    18. Cao, Zhi & Shen, Lei & Zhao, Jianan & Liu, Litao & Zhong, Shuai & Yang, Yan, 2016. "Modeling the dynamic mechanism between cement CO2 emissions and clinker quality to realize low-carbon cement," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 116-126.
    19. Glen D. Corder & Artem Golev & Julian Fyfe & Sarah King, 2014. "The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Jean Kabongo & Olivier Boiral, 2011. "Creating Value with Wastes: A Model and Typology of Sustainability Within Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 441-455, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:54:y:2010:i:10:p:704-710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.