IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v113y2016icp149-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving information flow on chemicals in electronic products and E-waste to minimize negative consequences for health and the environment

Author

Listed:
  • Scruggs, Caroline E.
  • Nimpuno, Nardono
  • Moore, Rachel B.B.

Abstract

Rapid advancements in technology are leading to the obsolescence of electronics and a global demand for new products at an increasing rate. As a result, increasing quantities of electronic products and electronic waste are created each year, creating challenges for health and the environment throughout the global product chain for electronics. This paper discusses findings from the United Nations Environment Program’s “Chemicals in Products” electronics case study, with a focus on a specific goal of the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) to ensure that information on chemicals is available, accessible, user friendly, adequate and appropriate to the needs of all stakeholders throughout the product chain. We use our case study findings plus recent insights and examples from the literature and businesses to offer recommendations for improving both the flow of chemical-related information in electronics product chains and sustainability in e-waste management. To identify the needs, gaps, obstacles, and solutions related to providing and accessing information on chemicals throughout electronic products’ life cycles, we interviewed 28 stakeholders at various points in the product chain. The interviews revealed a critical need for a global standard for chemical-related information sharing in the product chain as well as accessible platforms for effective communication and bi-directional sharing of that information by all stakeholders. Adequate flow and transparency of chemicals-related information was found to be important to reducing companies’ costs and business risks and also to protecting consumers and workers in electronic products’ production and end-of-life phases. In addition, the findings indicated a need to raise awareness about the chemicals present in products, along with their associated hazards, in order to improve risk management and handling of electronics and e-waste. In cases where improved information alone would not likely improve health or environmental outcomes, such as in e-waste management, we discuss additional steps to improve the situation, such as new business models for recycling and waste management. Knowledge about which chemicals are used in electronics, as well as information on how they are used, handled, and recycled or disposed of, will help authorities create meaningful regulations that minimize adverse impacts on human health and the environment. Improved bi-directional flow of chemical-related information in the electronics product chain will also help product developers better understand how to design products that result in fewer negative consequences for health and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Scruggs, Caroline E. & Nimpuno, Nardono & Moore, Rachel B.B., 2016. "Improving information flow on chemicals in electronic products and E-waste to minimize negative consequences for health and the environment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 149-164.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:149-164
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134491630146X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee, 2001. "Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 489-513, June.
    2. Cucchiella, Federica & D’Adamo, Idiano & Lenny Koh, S.C. & Rosa, Paolo, 2015. "Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 263-272.
    3. Kahhat, Ramzy & Kim, Junbeum & Xu, Ming & Allenby, Braden & Williams, Eric & Zhang, Peng, 2008. "Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 955-964.
    4. Kahhat, Ramzy & Williams, Eric, 2012. "Materials flow analysis of e-waste: Domestic flows and exports of used computers from the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Awasthi, Abhishek Kumar & Li, Jinhui, 2017. "An overview of the potential of eco-friendly hybrid strategy for metal recycling from WEEE," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 228-239.
    2. Li, Lixu & Zhu, Wenwen & Chen, Lujie & Liu, Yaoqi, 2024. "Generative AI usage and sustainable supply chain performance: A practice-based view," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Ida Mae de Waal, 2023. "The Legal Transition towards a More Circular Electrical and Electronic Equipment Chain—A Case Study of The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Li, Baoku & Nan, Yafeng & Yao, Ruoxi, 2024. "The inverted U-shaped relationship between information entropy of keyword combinations and sales of digital products: Evidence from China Tmall," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Kumar, Amit & Holuszko, Maria & Espinosa, Denise Crocce Romano, 2017. "E-waste: An overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 32-42.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran, Muhammad & Haydar, Sajjad & Kim, Junbeum & Awan, Muhammad Rizwan & Bhatti, Amanat Ali, 2017. "E-waste flows, resource recovery and improvement of legal framework in Pakistan," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 131-138.
    2. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    3. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2015. "Industrial Photovoltaic Systems: An Economic Analysis in Non-Subsidized Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Diane Sharratt & Bitten H. Brigham & Martin Brigham, 2007. "The Utility of Social Obligations in the UK Energy Industry," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1503-1522, December.
    5. Thac Dang‐Van & Tan Vo‐Thanh & Jianming Wang & Ninh Nguyen, 2023. "Luxury hotels' green practices and consumer brand identification: The roles of perceived green service innovation and perceived values," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4568-4583, November.
    6. Mallawarachchi, Harshani & Karunasena, Gayani, 2012. "Electronic and electrical waste management in Sri Lanka: Suggestions for national policy enhancements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-53.
    7. Yang, Xinhui & Wang, Chih-Wei & Zhang, Jie & Lin, Weizheng, 2025. "Hometown CEOs and greenwashing: From the perspective of energy consumption," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 826-838.
    8. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    9. Lee, Michael James & Rahimifard, Shahin, 2012. "An air-based automated material recycling system for postconsumer footwear products," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 90-99.
    10. Jelena Spanjol & Leona Tam & Vivian Tam, 2015. "Employer–Employee Congruence in Environmental Values: An Exploration of Effects on Job Satisfaction and Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 117-130, August.
    11. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & de Sá Lopes, Leonardo Batista, 2024. "Is environmental regulation keeping e-waste under control? Evidence from e-waste exports in the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Ivan Deviatkin & Sanna Rousu & Malahat Ghoreishi & Mohammad Naji Nassajfar & Mika Horttanainen & Ville Leminen, 2022. "Implementation of Circular Economy Strategies within the Electronics Sector: Insights from Finnish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Horațiu Vermeșan & Ancuța-Elena Tiuc & Marius Purcar, 2019. "Advanced Recovery Techniques for Waste Materials from IT and Telecommunication Equipment Printed Circuit Boards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss, 2010. "Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 217-229, May.
    15. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    16. Maria Loredana Nicolescu & Marius Nicolae Jula, 2015. "Analysis Of Household Behaviour To The Collection Of Waste Electrical And Electronic Equipment In Romania," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 3(2), pages 19-26, November.
    17. Bonou, Alexandra & Laurent, Alexis & Olsen, Stig I., 2016. "Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 327-337.
    18. Georgios K. Vasios & Andreas Y. Troumbis & Yiannis Zevgolis & Maria N. Hatziantoniou & Marios F. Balis, 2019. "Environmental choices in the era of ecological modernization: siting of common interest facilities as a multi-alternative decision field problem in insular setups," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 49-64, March.
    19. Zihao Zhen & Jiabei Chen & Ya Zhang & Jie Qin, 2025. "Navigating Urban Transformation: The Impact of Green Innovation on Sustainable Development Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Daniel Baratieri Valente & Ricardo César da Silva Guabiroba & Marco Antonio Conejero & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira Silva & Aldara da Silva César, 2021. "Economic analysis of waste electrical and electronic equipment management: a study involving recycling cooperatives in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17628-17649, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:149-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.