IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v109y2016icp67-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA

Author

Listed:
  • Hossain, Md. Uzzal
  • Poon, Chi Sun
  • Lo, Irene M.C.
  • Cheng, Jack C.P.

Abstract

The management of construction and demolition (C&D) waste and waste glass is a serious concern in Hong Kong, as well as other countries due to their non-combustible and non-putrescible nature, and the running out of disposal outlets. However, mineral wastes derived from C&D activities and waste glass are considered to have potential to be re-used as construction materials, especially as aggregates. In addition, Hong Kong urgently needs alternative and sustainable sources of aggregate, as the local quarry sites for aggregate production are expected to be exhausted soon. Many experimental studies have demonstrated that recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass can be potentially recycled for various engineering applications in Hong Kong, but no study has yet attempted to assess the sustainability by lifecycle assessment (LCA) techniques. In order to increase the environmental awareness in the construction industry, assessment of the environmental performance of construction materials by LCA is therefore needed. The present study was conducted to assess and compare the environmental consequences of recycled aggregates production from C&D waste and waste glass, and natural aggregate production from virgin materials by LCA by using case specific and first hand data. The results reveal that compared with natural coarse aggregates, recycled coarse aggregates produced from C&D waste reduce 65% greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission with a saving of 58% non-renewable energy consumption. Similar environmental benefits are observed for producing recycled fine aggregates from C&D waste. In addition, compared with the production of natural fine aggregates from river sand, producing recycled fine aggregates from waste glass saves 54% energy consumption and reduces 61% GHGs, and 46% SO2eq emissions. According to the IMPACT 2002+ Method, significant health, resource, climate change and ecosystem damages can be saved in producing recycled aggregates from both waste materials compared to producing and importing aggregates from virgin sources. This is the first ever LCA study on producing recycled aggregates from waste glass. Therefore, it can be concluded that substantial net environmental benefits can be realized for producing recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass. The results can provide a guidance to maximize C&D waste and waste glass recycling, resourceful treatment of wastes and conserve natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Poon, Chi Sun & Lo, Irene M.C. & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2016. "Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 67-77.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:67-77
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916300295
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling, Tung-Chai & Poon, Chi-Sun & Wong, Hau-Wing, 2013. "Management and recycling of waste glass in concrete products: Current situations in Hong Kong," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 25-31.
    2. Anastasiou, E.K. & Liapis, A. & Papayianni, I., 2015. "Comparative life cycle assessment of concrete road pavements using industrial by-products as alternative materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Jullien, A. & Proust, C. & Martaud, T. & Rayssac, E. & Ropert, C., 2012. "Variability in the environmental impacts of aggregate production," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-13.
    4. C. S. Poon & Ann Yu & L. Jaillon, 2004. "Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 461-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Poon, Chi Sun & Lo, Irene M.C. & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2017. "Comparative LCA on using waste materials in the cement industry: A Hong Kong case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 199-208.
    2. Maja Kępniak & Paweł Łukowski, 2024. "Multicriteria Analysis of Cement Mortar with Recycled Sand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Wang, Jianliang & Liu, Mingming & McLellan, Benjamin C. & Tang, Xu & Feng, Lianyong, 2017. "Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: A hybrid life cycle analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 38-45.
    4. Toniolo, Sara & Mazzi, Anna & Pieretto, Chiara & Scipioni, Antonio, 2017. "Allocation strategies in comparative life cycle assessment for recycling: Considerations from case studies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 249-261.
    5. Bryce, James & Brodie, Stefanie & Parry, Tony & Lo Presti, Davide, 2017. "A systematic assessment of road pavement sustainability through a review of rating tools," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 108-118.
    6. Magnusson, Simon & Mácsik, Josef, 2017. "Analysis of energy use and emissions of greenhouse gases, metals and organic substances from construction materials used for artificial turf," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 362-372.
    7. Anna M. Grabiec & Jeonghyun Kim & Andrzej Ubysz & Pilar Bilbao, 2021. "Some Remarks towards a Better Understanding of the Use of Concrete Recycled Aggregate: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Jianguo Chen & Yangyue Su & Hongyun Si & Jindao Chen, 2018. "Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Anna Furberg & Rickard Arvidsson & Sverker Molander, 2022. "A practice‐based framework for defining functional units in comparative life cycle assessments of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 718-730, June.
    11. Seong-Jun Yang & Ji-Young Eom & Myung-Jin Lee & Dae-Hwan Hwang & Won-Bin Park & Young-Min Wie & Ki-Gang Lee & Kang-Hoon Lee, 2023. "Comparative Environmental Evaluation of Sewage Sludge Treatment and Aggregate Production Process by Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Ehsan Momeni & Fereydoon Omidinasab & Ahmad Dalvand & Vahid Goodarzimehr & Abas Eskandari, 2022. "Flexural Strength of Concrete Beams Made of Recycled Aggregates: An Experimental and Soft Computing-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giani, Martina Irene & Dotelli, Giovanni & Brandini, Nicolò & Zampori, Luca, 2015. "Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt pavements using reclaimed asphalt, warm mix technology and cold in-place recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 224-238.
    2. Benson Teck Heng Lim & Bee Lan Oo & Charlie McLeod & Pengqi Yang, 2024. "Institutional and Actor Network Perspectives of Waste Management in Australia: Is the Construction Industry Prepared for a Circular Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    4. Cédric Mpié Simba & Emmanuel Lemelin, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Resources and Waste Quantities from Buildings (as Urban Mining Potential) Generated by the European Metropolis of Lille: A Methodology Coupling Data from Construction and D," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Capony, Adrien & Muresan, Bogdan & Dauvergne, Michel & Auriol, Jean-Claude & Ferber, Valéry & Jullien, Agnès, 2013. "Monitoring and environmental modeling of earthwork impacts: A road construction case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 124-133.
    6. Davor Kvočka & Jakob Šušteršič & Alenka Mauko Pranjić & Ana Mladenović, 2022. "Mass Concrete with EAF Steel Slag Aggregate: Workability, Strength, Temperature Rise, and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Wang, Jiayuan & Li, Zhengdao & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2014. "Critical factors in effective construction waste minimization at the design stage: A Shenzhen case study, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-7.
    8. Rosaria E.C. Amaral & Joel Brito & Matt Buckman & Elicia Drake & Esther Ilatova & Paige Rice & Carlos Sabbagh & Sergei Voronkin & Yewande S. Abraham, 2020. "Waste Management and Operational Energy for Sustainable Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Baldwin, Andrew & Poon, Chi-Sun & Shen, Li-Yin & Austin, Simon & Wong, Irene, 2009. "Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings: Analysis of precasting methods and traditional construction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2067-2073.
    10. R. Navon & O. Berkovich, 2006. "An automated model for materials management and control," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 635-646.
    11. Jin, Ruoyu & Chen, Qian & Soboyejo, Alfred, 2015. "Survey of the current status of sustainable concrete production in the U.S," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 148-159.
    12. Christina Lee & Panagiota Papadopoulou & Gauti Asbjörnsson & Erik Hulthén & Magnus Evertsson, 2022. "Understanding Current Challenges in Evaluating Environmental Impacts for Aggregate Producers through a Case Study in Western Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Ademilade Aboginije & Clinton Aigbavboa & Wellington Thwala, 2021. "A Holistic Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in the Nigerian Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Lu, Weisheng & Yuan, Hongping, 2010. "Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 201-208.
    15. Lanfang, Liu & Issam, Srour & Chong, Wai K. & Christopher, Hermreck, 2015. "Integrating G2G, C2C and resource flow analysis into life cycle assessment framework: A case of construction steel’s resource loop," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 143-152.
    16. Li, Jingru & Ding, Zhikun & Mi, Xuming & Wang, Jiayuan, 2013. "A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-26.
    17. Li, Jingru & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Zuo, Jian & Zhu, Jiaolan, 2015. "Designers’ attitude and behaviour towards construction waste minimization by design: A study in Shenzhen, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 29-35.
    18. Mok, Ken L. & Han, Seung H. & Choi, Seokjin, 2014. "The implementation of clean development mechanism (CDM) in the construction and built environment industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 512-523.
    19. Niluka Domingo & Heshani M. Edirisinghe & Ravindu Kahandawa & Gayan Wedawatta, 2024. "Generalised Linear Modelling for Construction Waste Estimation in Residential Projects: Case Study in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Gislaine Luvizão & Glicério Trichês, 2023. "Case Study on Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Road Restoration Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:67-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.