Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Hassan Javed
(Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)
- Anees Ahmad
(Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)
- Mohammad Rehan
(Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies (CEES), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)
- Muhammad Farooq
(Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (PMU), Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia)
- Muhammad Farhan
(Department of Mechanical Engineering (New Campus), University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 39020, Pakistan)
- Muhammad Amir Raza
(Department of Electrical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, SZAB Campus Khairpur Mir’s, Khairpur 66020, Pakistan
Centre for Advanced Studies in Renewable Energy, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75270, Pakistan)
- Abdul-Sattar Nizami
(Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Korea University, Seoul 02481, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
The construction industry significantly impacts the environment, consuming 50% of natural resources and generating 20% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In developing countries, managing construction and demolition (C&D) waste is a growing challenge due to rapid urbanization and inadequate waste management practices. This study employs life cycle assessment and life cycle costing to compare landfill and recycling scenarios for C&D waste using ISO 14040 (Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework) and ISO 14044 (Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines). The study’s system boundary encompasses the entire life cycle of C&D waste management, with one ton of C&D waste as the functional unit. The results demonstrated that landfilling C&D waste is harmful due to negative impacts from transportation and landfill emissions. Recycling shows promising potential by significantly reducing environmental impacts and lowering the demand for new raw materials. The recycling scenario substantially decreased GHG emissions, saving 37 kg of CO 2 equivalents per ton of waste. Economically, recycling C&D waste proved more viable, with favorable indicators. Implementing a recycling plant in Lahore could save USD 2.53 per ton in resource costs and mitigate significant environmental impacts. This study recommends that policymakers in developing countries prioritize C&D waste recycling to enhance sustainability and support the transition to a circular economy. The findings provide valuable insights for developing effective waste management strategies, contributing to environmental conservation and economic efficiency. These recommendations guide future initiatives for sustainable C&D waste management, promoting a greener and more resilient urban environment. Furthermore, this study underlines the potential of C&D waste recycling to contribute significantly to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly sustainable cities (SDG 11), responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), and climate action (SDG 13).
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Hassan Javed & Anees Ahmad & Mohammad Rehan & Muhammad Farooq & Muhammad Farhan & Muhammad Amir Raza & Abdul-Sattar Nizami, 2025.
"Advancing Circular Economy Through Optimized Construction and Demolition Waste Management Under Life Cycle Approach,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4882-:d:1664780
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4882-:d:1664780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.