IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v264y2023ics0925527323002190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal mechanism for project splitting with time cost and asymmetric information

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng, Nengmin
  • Wu, Guangdong
  • Zeng, Dongling
  • Liu, Ang
  • Ren, Tinghai
  • Liu, Bingsheng

Abstract

In practice, most owners are sensitive to construction-project duration. Thus, to complete a project quickly, they like to divide a project into many sections before bidding and award them to different constructors. However, such division makes achieving optimality complicated because of information asymmetry (i.e., owners cannot fully understand the costs of potential constructors before bidding). To solve this problem, this study proposes an optimal mechanism that can generate the optimal section number, selection of constructors, section allocation, and constructors' payment. We observe that our mechanism always splits the project evenly among all winning constructors. In addition, the optimal number of sections relies upon the trade-off between time and construction costs. Under this mechanism, the payment to each constructor is equal to its virtual construction cost multiplied by its share. As a result, when winners are multiple, the higher the construction cost of a winner, the higher his payment and information rent is. That is, the owner can achieve price discrimination in terms of payment, and winners’ curse occurs in terms of information rent. Furthermore, the lower the construction cost of a winner, the more significant such curse is. Compared to the case of symmetric information, asymmetric information increases the price discrimination degree but decreases the optimal number of project sections. This study expands the existing project-bidding mechanism from the exogenous number of project sections to the endogenous number of sections scenario.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng, Nengmin & Wu, Guangdong & Zeng, Dongling & Liu, Ang & Ren, Tinghai & Liu, Bingsheng, 2023. "Optimal mechanism for project splitting with time cost and asymmetric information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:264:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323002190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323002190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jati Utomo Dwi Hatmoko & Stephen Scott, 2010. "Simulating the impact of supply chain management practice on the performance of medium-sized building projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 35-49.
    2. Hongnan Zhuang & Runtong Zhang, 2015. "Study on the Project Supervision System Based on the Theory of Information Economics," Springer Books, in: Zhenji Zhang & Zuojun Max Shen & Juliang Zhang & Runtong Zhang (ed.), Liss 2014, edition 127, pages 551-556, Springer.
    3. Ping Li & Hong-zhi He, 2013. "Study of Optimal Contract Under Asymmetric Information," Springer Books, in: Ershi Qi & Jiang Shen & Runliang Dou (ed.), The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 373-382, Springer.
    4. Yue Zhai & Ray Y. Zhong & Zhi Li & George Huang, 2017. "Production lead-time hedging and coordination in prefabricated construction supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3984-4002, July.
    5. Shamir, Noam & Zvilichovsky, David, 2022. "Dynamic reputation, project selection and market efficiency: The importance of small projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Yeo, K.T. & Ning, J.H., 2006. "Managing uncertainty in major equipment procurement in engineering projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 123-134, May.
    7. Zhixi Wan & Damian R. Beil, 2014. "Bid-Taker Power and Supply Base Diversification," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 300-314, May.
    8. Fangruo Chen, 2007. "Auctioning Supply Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1562-1576, October.
    9. Chantal C. Cantarelli & Caspar G. Chorus & Scott W. Cunningham, 2013. "Explaining Cost Overruns of Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects using a Signalling Game," Papers 1307.2180, arXiv.org.
    10. Missbauer, Hubert & Hauber, Wolfgang, 2006. "Bid calculation for construction projects: Regulations and incentive effects of unit price contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 1005-1019, June.
    11. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Göker Ayd{i}n & Volodymyr Babich & Damian R. Beil, 2009. "Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 192-209, February.
    12. Debabrata Dey & Ming Fan & Conglei Zhang, 2010. "Design and Analysis of Contracts for Software Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 93-114, March.
    13. Izak Duenyas & Bin Hu & Damian R. Beil, 2013. "Simple Auctions for Supply Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2332-2342, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Hu & Anyan Qi, 2018. "Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 655-666, October.
    2. Xiaoshuai Fan & Ying‐Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "To Bribe or Not in a Procurement Auction under Disparate Corruption Pressure," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1220-1245, May.
    3. Budde, Maximilian & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "First- and second-price sealed-bid auctions applied to push and pull supply contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 370-382.
    4. Aadhaar Chaturvedi & Damian R. Beil & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2014. "Split-Award Auctions for Supplier Retention," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1719-1737, July.
    5. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    6. Yonatan Gur & Lijian Lu & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2017. "Framework Agreements in Procurement: An Auction Model and Design Recommendations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 586-603, October.
    7. Shuai Yuan & Sanjukta Das & R. Ramesh & Chunming Qiao, 2018. "Service Agreement Trifecta: Backup Resources, Price and Penalty in the Availability-Aware Cloud," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 947-964, December.
    8. Ehsan Bolandifar & Tianjun Feng & Fuqiang Zhang, 2018. "Simple Contracts to Assure Supply Under Noncontractible Capacity and Asymmetric Cost Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 217-231, May.
    9. Aadhaar Chaturvedi & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2011. "Optimal Procurement Design in the Presence of Supply Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 227-243, May.
    10. Lorentziadis, Panos L., 2016. "Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 347-371.
    11. Ivona Ivić & Anita Cerić, 2023. "Risks Caused by Information Asymmetry in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Tarun Jain & Jishnu Hazra, 2019. "Vendor’s Strategic Investments Under IT Outsourcing Competition," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 16-39, March.
    13. Philippe Choné & Laurent Linnemer & Thibaud Vergé, 2021. "Double Marginalization and Vertical Integration," CESifo Working Paper Series 8971, CESifo.
    14. Leon Yang Chu & Yunzeng Wang, 2015. "Bundled Procurement for Technology Acquisition and Future Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 249-261, May.
    15. Kai-Lung Hui & Ping Fan Ke & Yuxi Yao & Wei T. Yue, 2019. "Bilateral Liability-Based Contracts in Information Security Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 411-429, June.
    16. Mingwen Yang & Varghese S. Jacob & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2021. "Cloud Service Model’s Role in Provider and User Security Investment Incentives," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 419-437, February.
    17. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    18. Wang, Kai & Ding, Peiqi & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2021. "Strategic credit sales to express retail under asymmetric default risk and stochastic market demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Cai, W. & Singham, D.I., 2018. "A principal–agent problem with heterogeneous demand distributions for a carbon capture and storage system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 239-256.
    20. Begen, Mehmet A. & Pun, Hubert & Yan, Xinghao, 2016. "Supply and demand uncertainty reduction efforts and cost comparison," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 125-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:264:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323002190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.