IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: A robust optimization approach

Listed author(s):
  • Carvalho, Andréa Nunes
  • Oliveira, Fabricio
  • Scavarda, Luiz Felipe
Registered author(s):

    Uncertainty has a significant impact on the stability and performance of engineering-to-order (ETO) production systems by affecting due date achievement, efficient resource allocation and the usage of nonregular working force. Proactive planning approaches consider information about uncertainty to protect the generated plans against future disruption. Likewise, this paper´s goal is to propose and apply a robust optimization model that addresses a tactical capacity planning problem by incorporating uncertainties regarding the duration of production processes. The model aims at solution robustness (or stability) and intends to enhance and support the decision-making process of a real-world ETO industrial setting. Monte Carlo simulation is employed to assess the simultaneous impact of multiple constraints on the robustness of the generated solutions. The computational results are adherent to the industry setting studied and show the effects of the conservatism level on the optimal values of the generated plans. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first robust optimization model for tactical capacity planning that explicitly addresses the ETO context.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527316301712
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal International Journal of Production Economics.

    Volume (Year): 180 (2016)
    Issue (Month): C ()
    Pages: 158-171

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:180:y:2016:i:c:p:158-171
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.019
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Bianco, Lucio & Caramia, Massimiliano, 2012. "An exact algorithm to minimize the makespan in project scheduling with scarce resources and generalized precedence relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 73-85.
    2. Aouam, Tarik & Brahimi, Nadjib, 2013. "Integrated production planning and order acceptance under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 504-515.
    3. Bredström, D. & Flisberg, P. & Rönnqvist, M., 2013. "A new method for robustness in rolling horizon planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 41-52.
    4. Mestry, Siddharth & Damodaran, Purushothaman & Chen, Chin-Sheng, 2011. "A branch and price solution approach for order acceptance and capacity planning in make-to-order operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 480-495, June.
    5. J Bengtsson & D Bredström & P Flisberg & M Rönnqvist, 2013. "Robust planning of blending activities at refineries," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(6), pages 848-863, June.
    6. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    7. Sharda, Bikram & Akiya, Naoko, 2012. "Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: A case study using discrete event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 161-171.
    8. Buxey, Geoff, 2003. "Strategy not tactics drives aggregate planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 331-346, September.
    9. Corominas, Albert & Lusa, Amaia & Olivella, Jordi, 2012. "A detailed workforce planning model including non-linear dependence of capacity on the size of the staff and cash management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 445-458.
    10. Neumann, K. & Zimmermann, J., 2000. "Procedures for resource leveling and net present value problems in project scheduling with general temporal and resource constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 425-443, December.
    11. Corti, Donatella & Pozzetti, Alessandro & Zorzini, Marta, 2006. "A capacity-driven approach to establish reliable due dates in a MTO environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 536-554, December.
    12. Kingsman, Brian G., 2000. "Modelling input-output workload control for dynamic capacity planning in production planning systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 73-93, October.
    13. Hans, E.W. & Herroelen, W. & Leus, R. & Wullink, G., 2007. "A hierarchical approach to multi-project planning under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 563-577, October.
    14. Deblaere, Filip & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2011. "Proactive policies for the stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 308-316, October.
    15. Talla Nobibon, Fabrice & Leus, Roel & Nip, Kameng & Wang, Zhenbo, 2015. "Resource loading with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 404-416.
    16. Wang, Xiuli & Xie, Xingzi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "Order acceptance and scheduling in a two-machine flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 366-376.
    17. Rieck, Julia & Zimmermann, Jürgen & Gather, Thorsten, 2012. "Mixed-integer linear programming for resource leveling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 27-37.
    18. Gorissen, Bram L. & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & den Hertog, Dick, 2015. "A practical guide to robust optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-137.
    19. Zorzini, M. & Corti, D. & Pozzetti, A., 2008. "Due date (DD) quotation and capacity planning in make-to-order companies: Results from an empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 919-933, April.
    20. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2015. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 187-203.
    21. Zhong, Xueling & Ou, Jinwen & Wang, Guoqing, 2014. "Order acceptance and scheduling with machine availability constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 435-441.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:180:y:2016:i:c:p:158-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.