IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v252y2022ics0925527322001505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context

Author

Listed:
  • Neumann, Anas
  • Hajji, Adnene
  • Rekik, Monia
  • Pellerin, Robert

Abstract

This paper presents a new mathematical formulation for planning and scheduling activities in the Engineer To Order (ETO) context. Designed from an Advanced Planning System perspective, the proposed formulation not only schedules production operations but also takes into account the assembly, design, engineering, and validation phases. The definition of resources is thus generic and enables to model employees, finite capacity machines, and consumable materials. The definition of operations allows to represent short production operations, respecting precedence relations representing the assembly of elements, but also non-physical activities. Non-physical activities are longer, subject to validation, and applied once for multiple identical elements. Furthermore, to integrate planning and scheduling, the proposed formulation is not limited to time-based objectives but also considers financial and organizational aspects. The experiments carried out on instances with up to 100 operations show that our model performs well and requires reasonable computing times. Besides, we propose an ETO strategy that tends to validate the design of non-standard and highly uncertain items first and delay their production or purchase. Our integrated model governed by the proposed ETO strategy is compared to a model that mimics decision processes in existing industrial systems. The comparative study and experimental results highlight how this strategy yields robust integrated solutions that offer a good trade-off between the wastes caused by unpredictable changes in the BOM and the projects completion time.

Suggested Citation

  • Neumann, Anas & Hajji, Adnene & Rekik, Monia & Pellerin, Robert, 2022. "A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:252:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322001505
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527322001505
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfnes, Erlend & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed & Dreyer, Heidi C., 2021. "Exploring systemic factors creating uncertainty in complex engineer-to-order supply chains: Case studies from Norwegian shipbuilding first tier suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Ilenia Zennaro & Serena Finco & Daria Battini & Alessandro Persona, 2019. "Big size highly customised product manufacturing systems: a literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5362-5385, August.
    3. Sara Markworth Johnsen & Lars Hvam, 2019. "Understanding the impact of non-standard customisations in an engineer-to-order context: A case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(21), pages 6780-6794, November.
    4. Bertrand, J. W. M. & Muntslag, D. R., 1993. "Production control in engineer-to-order firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 3-22, July.
    5. Georges Baydoun & Alain Haït & Robert Pellerin & Bernard Clément & Guillaume Bouvignies, 2016. "A rough-cut capacity planning model with overlapping," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 335-364, March.
    6. Luh, Peter B. & Liu, Feng & Moser, Bryan, 1999. "Scheduling of design projects with uncertain number of iterations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 575-592, March.
    7. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2016. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: A robust optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 158-171.
    9. Pellerin, Robert & Perrier, Nathalie & Berthaut, François, 2020. "A survey of hybrid metaheuristics for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 395-416.
    10. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Kaut, Michal & Wallace, Stein W., 2017. "The impact of design uncertainty in engineer-to-order project planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1098-1109.
    11. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2015. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 187-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cannas, Violetta Giada & Gosling, Jonathan, 2021. "A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Maglietta, Amedeo & Oropallo, Eugenio, 2023. "Sailing through a digital and resilient shipbuilding supply chain: An empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Alfnes, Erlend & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed & Dreyer, Heidi C., 2023. "Rearticulating supply chain design and operation principles to mitigate uncertainty in the Norwegian engineer-to-order shipbuilding sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Sandrin, Enrico & Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano, 2018. "Leveraging high-involvement practices to develop mass customization capability: A contingent configurational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 335-345.
    5. Gláucya Daú & Annibal Scavarda & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Vivianne Julianelli Taveira Portugal, 2019. "The Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0: The Circular Economy Transition Conceptual Framework with the Corporate Social Responsibility Mirror," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Kaut, Michal & Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2021. "The combined impact of stochastic and correlated activity durations and design uncertainty on project plans," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Brachmann, Robert & Kolisch, Rainer, 2021. "The impact of flexibility on engineer-to-order production planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    9. Fernanda Saidelles Bataglin & Daniela Dietz Viana & Carlos Torres Formoso, 2022. "Design Principles and Prescriptions for Planning and Controlling Engineer-to-Order Industrialized Building Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. David Roch-Dupré & Carlos Camacho-Gómez & Asunción P. Cucala & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Álvaro López-López & Antonio Portilla-Figueras & Ramón R. Pecharromán & Antonio Fernández-Cardador & Sancho Sa, 2021. "Optimal Location and Sizing of Energy Storage Systems in DC-Electrified Railway Lines Using a Coral Reefs Optimization Algorithm with Substrate Layers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Changjiu Li & Yong Zhang & Xichao Su & Xinwei Wang, 2022. "An Improved Optimization Algorithm for Aeronautical Maintenance and Repair Task Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Shahsavar, Aria & Sadeghi, J. Kiarash & Shockley, Jeff & Ojha, Divesh, 2021. "On the relationship between lean scheduling and economic performance in shipbuilding: A proposed model and comparative evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Szwarc Eryk & Wikarek Jarosław, 2020. "Proactive Planning of Project Team Members’ Competences," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 71-84, January.
    15. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Sung, Chang Sup & Juhn, Jaeho, 2009. "Makespan minimization for a 2-stage assembly scheduling problem subject to component available time constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 392-401, June.
    17. Neufeld, Janis S. & Schulz, Sven & Buscher, Udo, 2023. "A systematic review of multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 1-23.
    18. Florian Mischek & Nysret Musliu & Andrea Schaerf, 2023. "Local search approaches for the test laboratory scheduling problem with variable task grouping," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 457-477, October.
    19. Mirco Peron & Giuseppe Fragapane & Fabio Sgarbossa & Michael Kay, 2020. "Digital Facility Layout Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Alfredo S. Ramos & Pablo A. Miranda-Gonzalez & Samuel Nucamendi-Guillén & Elias Olivares-Benitez, 2023. "A Formulation for the Stochastic Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem Solved with a Multi-Start Iterated Local Search Metaheuristic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:252:y:2022:i:c:s0925527322001505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.