IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v605y2022ics0378437122006021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modifying link capacity to avoid Braess Paradox considering elastic demand

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Aihu
  • Tang, Yuanhua
  • Mohmand, Yasir Tariq
  • Xu, Pei

Abstract

A common practice to improve travel efficiency is to expand the existing road infrastructure; however, as pointed out by Braess Paradox, this expansion may worsen congestion. Braess Paradox has been extensively studied, but very few have touched on the governance of the paradox links. As such, this research aims to detect the effects of closing and expanding a paradox link and to find effective measures for avoiding Braess Paradox. The results identify two types of paradox links: non-monotonic and monotonic. For monotonic links, higher capacity worsens Braess Paradox even if the link capacity is increased to an unlimited level, whereas, for non-monotonic, it is possible to avoid Braess Paradox by modifying link capacity. Finally, the results also show that persistent expansion would not lead to a massive improvement in travel efficiency and that the expansion is not always helpful.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Aihu & Tang, Yuanhua & Mohmand, Yasir Tariq & Xu, Pei, 2022. "Modifying link capacity to avoid Braess Paradox considering elastic demand," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:605:y:2022:i:c:s0378437122006021
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437122006021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:cbooks:9780511771576 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anna Nagurney & David Boyce, 2005. "Preface to “On a Paradox of Traffic Planning”," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 443-445, November.
    3. Dietrich Braess & Anna Nagurney & Tina Wakolbinger, 2005. "On a Paradox of Traffic Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 446-450, November.
    4. Frédéric Babonneau & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2008. "An Efficient Method to Compute Traffic Assignment Problems with Elastic Demands," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 249-260, May.
    5. T. Leventhal & G. Nemhauser & L. Trotter, 1973. "A Column Generation Algorithm for Optimal Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 168-176, May.
    6. Epstein, Amir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Efficient graph topologies in network routing games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-125, May.
    7. Sun, Li & Liu, Like & Xu, Zhongzhi & Jie, Yang & Wei, Dong & Wang, Pu, 2015. "Locating inefficient links in a large-scale transportation network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 537-545.
    8. Nathan H. Gartner, 1980. "Optimal Traffic Assignment with Elastic Demands: A Review Part II. Algorithmic Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 192-208, May.
    9. Dudhe, Naini & Benjamin, Colin, 2021. "Entanglement and quantum strategies reduce congestion costs in Pigou networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    10. Harks, Tobias & Schröder, Marc & Vermeulen, Dries, 2019. "Toll caps in privatized road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 947-956.
    11. Richard Steinberg & Willard I. Zangwill, 1983. "The Prevalence of Braess' Paradox," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 301-318, August.
    12. Serdar Çolak & Antonio Lima & Marta C. González, 2016. "Understanding congested travel in urban areas," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, April.
    13. Perez, Yuri & Pereira, Fabio Henrique, 2021. "Simulation of traffic light disruptions in street networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    14. O'Hare, Steven J. & Connors, Richard D. & Watling, David P., 2016. "Mechanisms that govern how the Price of Anarchy varies with travel demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 55-80.
    15. Nathan H. Gartner, 1980. "Optimal Traffic Assignment with Elastic Demands: A Review Part I. Analysis Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 174-191, May.
    16. Yao, Jia & Huang, Wenhua & Chen, Anthony & Cheng, Zhanhong & An, Shi & Xu, Guangming, 2019. "Paradox links can improve system efficiency: An illustration in traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 35-49.
    17. Easley,David & Kleinberg,Jon, 2010. "Networks, Crowds, and Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521195331.
    18. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2010. "A class of bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 73-89, January.
    19. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    20. Hillel Bar-Gera, 2002. "Origin-Based Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 398-417, November.
    21. Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi & Roberto Cominetti & Panayotis Mertikopoulos & Marco Scarsini, 2020. "When Is Selfish Routing Bad? The Price of Anarchy in Light and Heavy Traffic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 411-434, March.
    22. Sullivan, J.L. & Novak, D.C. & Aultman-Hall, L. & Scott, D.M., 2010. "Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: A link-based capacity-reduction approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 323-336, June.
    23. Dial, Robert B., 2006. "A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 917-936, December.
    24. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & (Avi) Ceder, Avishai & Sarvi, Majid & Asadi, Mohsen, 2019. "Is it time to go for no-car zone policies? Braess Paradox Detection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 251-264.
    25. Sanjiv Kapoor & Junghwan Shin, 2020. "Price of Anarchy in Networks with Heterogeneous Latency Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 755-773, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Jia & Huang, Wenhua & Chen, Anthony & Cheng, Zhanhong & An, Shi & Xu, Guangming, 2019. "Paradox links can improve system efficiency: An illustration in traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 35-49.
    2. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & (Avi) Ceder, Avishai & Sarvi, Majid & Asadi, Mohsen, 2019. "Is it time to go for no-car zone policies? Braess Paradox Detection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 251-264.
    3. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2021. "The effect of modern traffic information on Braess’ paradox," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    5. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2018. "Braess paradox in a network with stochastic dynamics and fixed strategies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 133-152.
    6. Yu (Marco) Nie, 2012. "A Note on Bar-Gera's Algorithm for the Origin-Based Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 27-38, February.
    7. Ye, Jiao & Jiang, Yu & Chen, Jun & Liu, Zhiyuan & Guo, Renzhong, 2021. "Joint optimisation of transfer location and capacity for a capacitated multimodal transport network with elastic demand: a bi-level programming model and paradoxes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Frédéric Babonneau & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2008. "An Efficient Method to Compute Traffic Assignment Problems with Elastic Demands," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 249-260, May.
    9. Novak, D.C. & Sullivan, J.F. & Sentoff, K. & Dowds, J., 2020. "A framework to guide strategic disinvestment in roadway infrastructure considering social vulnerability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 436-451.
    10. Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Xinyuan & Hu, Jintao & Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Honggang, 2023. "An alternating direction method of multipliers for solving user equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1072-1084.
    11. Zhang, Honggang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Jian & Wu, Yunchi, 2023. "A novel flow update policy in solving traffic assignment problems: Successive over relaxation iteration method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Xie, Chi, 2016. "New insights and improvements of using paired alternative segments for traffic assignmentAuthor-Name: Xie, Jun," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 406-424.
    13. Perederieieva, Olga & Raith, Andrea & Schmidt, Marie, 2018. "Non-additive shortest path in the context of traffic assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 325-338.
    14. Jun Xie & Yu (Marco) Nie, 2019. "A New Algorithm for Achieving Proportionality in User Equilibrium Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 566-584, March.
    15. Bar-Gera, Hillel & Boyce, David & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2012. "User-equilibrium route flows and the condition of proportionality," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 440-462.
    16. Jafari, Ehsan & Pandey, Venktesh & Boyles, Stephen D., 2017. "A decomposition approach to the static traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 270-296.
    17. Rinaldi, Marco & Tampère, Chris M.J. & Viti, Francesco, 2018. "On characterizing the relationship between route choice behaviour and optimal traffic control solution space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 892-906.
    18. Wu, Di & Yin, Yafeng & Lawphongpanich, Siriphong, 2011. "Optimal selection of build–operate-transfer projects on transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1699-1709.
    19. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2010. "A class of bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 73-89, January.
    20. Zheng, Hong & Peeta, Srinivas, 2014. "Cost scaling based successive approximation algorithm for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 17-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:605:y:2022:i:c:s0378437122006021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.