IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v107y1981i2p255-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exact solution of the impure one-dimensional n-vector model with bilinear and biquadratic exchange interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Knežević, M.
  • Milošević, S.

Abstract

We demonstrate explicitly that the impure one-dimensional n-vector model with bilinear and biquadratic exchange interactions can be solved exactly. Results are provided for the free energy, equal-time spin-spin correlation functions and the initial susceptibility of the corresponding bond and site model in the annealed and quenched limit. A numerical analysis of the thermodynamic response functions in the n = 3 case is performed, and therein some interesting consequences of the simultaneous influence of the biquadratic interactions and impurities are established. The presence of the biquadratic interaction is interpreted as an effect of the lattice compressibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Knežević, M. & Milošević, S., 1981. "Exact solution of the impure one-dimensional n-vector model with bilinear and biquadratic exchange interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 255-279.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:107:y:1981:i:2:p:255-279
    DOI: 10.1016/0378-4371(81)90088-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378437181900881
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0378-4371(81)90088-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pincus, J J, 1975. "Pressure Groups and the Pattern of Tariffs," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(4), pages 757-778, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin, Sheng, 2000. "The Political Economy of Trade Policy in China," Working Papers 10/2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    2. Richard Pomfret, 2003. "Trade and Exchange Rate Policies in Formerly Centrally Planned Economies," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 585-612, April.
    3. John Tressler, 1978. "Political Goods and Trade Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 22(1), pages 51-59, March.
    4. Glismann, Hans H. & Spinanger, Dean, 1984. "Clothing the world efficiently: The MFA and consumers," Kiel Working Papers 208, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Wen Li Cheng & Meng-Chun Liu & Xiaokai Yang, 2005. "A Ricardian Model With Endogenous Comparative Advantage And Endogenous Trade Policy Regimes," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 7, pages 109-130, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Robert Pahre, 1998. "Reactions and Reciprocity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(4), pages 467-492, August.
    7. Mirabelle Muûls & Dimitra Petropoulou, 2013. "A swing state theory of trade protection in the Electoral College," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 705-724, May.
    8. Grossman, Gene M. & Helpman, Elhanan, 1996. "Rent dissipation, free riding, and trade policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 795-803, April.
    9. Donald Feaver & Kenneth Wilson, 1998. "Unlocking Australia's Contingent Protection Black Box," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(224), pages 62-73, March.
    10. Emile van Ommeren & Arlo Poletti & Dirk De Bièvre, 2021. "The European Union and the political economy of enforcing international trade rules," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 377-400, September.
    11. Saha, Amrita, 2019. "Trade policy & lobbying effectiveness: Theory and evidence for India," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 165-192.
    12. Friedrich Schneider & Jörg Naumann, 1982. "Interest groups in democracies — How influential are they?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 281-303, January.
    13. Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Maria Petrova & Ruben Enikolopov, 2008. "The Dracula effect: voter information and trade policy," Economics Working Papers 1296, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2020.
    14. Don P. Clark & Donald Bruce, 2006. "Who Bears The Burden Of U.S. Nontariff Measures?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(2), pages 274-286, April.
    15. Christis G. Tombazos, 2003. "Unprotective Tariffs, Ineffective Liberalization, and Other Mysteries: An Investigation of the Endogenous Dimensions of Trade Policy Formation in Australia," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(1), pages 49-74, July.
    16. Kishore Gawande & Alok K. Bohara, 2000. "Errors‐in‐Variables Bounds in a Tobit Model of Endogenous Protection," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 881-905, April.
    17. Malozovsky, Yu.M. & Rozenbaum, V.M., 1991. "Orientational ordering in two-dimensional systems with long-range interaction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 127-145.
    18. S. Lael Brainard, 1991. "Protecting Losers: Optimal Diversification, Insurance, and Trade Policy," NBER Working Papers 3773, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Metcalfe, Mark R. & Goodwin, Barry K., 1999. "An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Trade Policy Protection in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 153-165, March.
    20. Bibo Liang, 2007. "Political Economy of US Trade Policy towards China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 15(5), pages 50-64, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:107:y:1981:i:2:p:255-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.