IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v14y2025ics2214716025000090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simplicity or flexibility? Dual sourcing in multi-echelon systems under disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Hamdan, Sadeque
  • Boulaksil, Youssef
  • Ghoudi, Kilani
  • Hamdouch, Younes

Abstract

Disruptive events like the COVID-19 pandemic have exposed supply chain vulnerabilities. This study focuses on dual sourcing as a resilient strategy and examines a stochastic, single-item, multi-echelon, multi-period, dual sourcing inventory system under backorders. In each echelon, the decision-maker faces a dual-sourcing situation wherein the item can be replenished from a slow regular supplier or a more expensive and faster emergency supplier. We compare two inventory management policies: the Dual-Index Policy (DIP) and the Tailored Base-Surge (TBS) Policy, while also investigating how various factors influence policy effectiveness and the role of demand disruptions. Our findings indicate that the TBS policy generally relies more on upstream suppliers than the DIP. However, in scenarios of high demand uncertainty, upstream suppliers are seldom used. DIP is more effective for short networks facing sudden demand drops, whereas TBS excels when experiencing demand spikes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamdan, Sadeque & Boulaksil, Youssef & Ghoudi, Kilani & Hamdouch, Younes, 2025. "Simplicity or flexibility? Dual sourcing in multi-echelon systems under disruption," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000090
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716025000090
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.