IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics0264837726002279.html

Spatiotemporal dynamics of preferential occupation of high-quality cropland by construction land expansion in china and its implications for food production potential

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng, Shuangqing
  • Song, Wei
  • Deng, Xiangzheng

Abstract

Global food security is increasingly challenged by issues such as population growth, cropland decline, and rapid urbanization, among which construction land expansion and its occupation of high-quality cropland have become key drivers affecting food production potential. However, existing studies have largely focused on changes in cropland quantity, with little attention to the selective occupation of high-quality cropland as well as its implications for food security. To mitigate this gap, this study develops an Indicator of the Tendency toward Preferential Occupation of high-quality cropland by construction land expansion (ITPO) based on the China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) and farmland production potential data, which enables a quantitative assessment of the selective effects of urban expansion on cropland quality structure, hoping to provide new insights into the “land-use + food security” nexus. According to the results, several facts have been identified: (1) cropland occupied by construction land expansion exhibits a clear spatial pattern from eastern coastal regions toward inland areas. From 1985–2020, 85.93% of newly expanded construction land originated from cropland, of which 55.8% was high-quality cropland. Such occupation is primarily concentrated in major urban agglomerations, including the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, and Chengdu–Chongqing regions; (2) preferential occupation shows significant spatial and temporal heterogeneities, with persistent high-intensity clusters in eastern, northeastern, and central China, while western China maintains a relatively high proportion of statistically significant counties, approaching 60% in most periods (approximately 55% during 1991–2000); (3) the spatial center of both Construction Land Occupation of Cropland (CLOC) and ITPO shift westward in the study period, with a more significant displacement observed for ITPO, indicating an increasing westward redistribution of pressure on high-quality cropland; and (4) cumulative losses in food production potential caused by construction land expansion during 1985–2020 are estimated at 4.59 × 10 ¹ ⁰ kg (0.15% of total cropland potential), of which 2.69 × 10 ¹ ⁰ kg (0.09%) was high-quality cropland. Overall, although the relative intensity of preferential occupation of high-quality cropland has declined over time, its absolute loss remains substantial due to higher unit productivity and spatial concentration. By incorporating the cropland quality structure into the analysis, this study advances the understanding of the relationship between construction land expansion and food security, providing quantitative evidence to support differentiated cropland protection and territorial spatial governance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng, Shuangqing & Song, Wei & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2026. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of preferential occupation of high-quality cropland by construction land expansion in china and its implications for food production potential," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726002279
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiu, Bingwen & Li, Haiwen & Tang, Zhenghong & Chen, Chongcheng & Berry, Joe, 2020. "How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Shuanqging Sheng & Jinchuan Huang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms of Ecosystem Services in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration: Implications for Sustainable Land Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Zhou, Yang & Zhong, Zhen & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2023. "Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    5. Shuangqing Sheng & Ping Zhang & Jinchuan Huang & Lei Ning, 2025. "Research Advances and Emerging Trends in the Impact of Urban Expansion on Food Security: A Global Overview," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Iraj Emadodin & Daiju Narita & Hans Bork, 2012. "Soil degradation and agricultural sustainability: an overview from Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 611-625, October.
    7. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Alessia Iannillo & Isidoro Fasolino, 2021. "Land-Use Mix and Urban Sustainability: Benefits and Indicators Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Karen C Seto & Michail Fragkias & Burak Güneralp & Michael K Reilly, 2011. "A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-9, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jinhua & Wang, Hongwei & Wang, Can & Huang, Xin & Wei, Jianxin & Wang, Zhenggang & Zhang, Chi & Chen, Bei & Yiming, Yilinuer & Lei, Cheng & Zhou, Chunshan, 2025. "Zoning and spatial resilience: Land use and food security in the Ili River Valley, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Qie, Lu & Pu, Lijie & Tang, Pengfei & Liu, Rongjuan & Huang, Sihua & Xu, Fei & Zhong, Taiyang, 2023. "Gains and losses of farmland associated with farmland protection policy and urbanization in China: An integrated perspective based on goal orientation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Rommel, Jens & Anggraini, Eva, 2018. "Spatially explicit framed field experiments on ecosystem services governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 201-205.
    4. Ascui, Francisco & Ball, Alex & Kahn, Lewis & Rowe, James, 2021. "Is operationalising natural capital risk assessment practicable?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Jia Chen & Kuan Zhang, 2024. "Analysis on the spatiotemporal pattern and driving force of the spatial deviation index of grain and economy in counties in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Yue Wu & Yue Yang & Weishun Xu & Qiuxiao Chen, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation Resources in Higher Education Institutions on the Development of Sci-Tech Parks’ Enterprises in the Urban Innovative Districts at the Stage of Urbanization Transformation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, October.
    7. Susca, T. & Zanghirella, F. & Colasuonno, L. & Del Fatto, V., 2022. "Effect of green wall installation on urban heat island and building energy use: A climate-informed systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    9. Sergei Schaub & Tobias Roth & Petyo Bonev, 2025. "The effect of result‐based agri‐environmental payments on biodiversity: Evidence from Switzerland," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(4), pages 1228-1254, August.
    10. Law, Elizabeth A. & Macchi, Leandro & Baumann, Matthias & Decarre, Julieta & Gavier-Pizarro, Gregorio & Levers, Christian & Mastrangelo, Matías E. & Murray, Francisco & Müller, Daniel & Piquer-Rodrígu, 2021. "Fading opportunities for mitigating agriculture-environment trade-offs in a south American deforestation hotspot," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 262.
    11. repec:ags:aaea22:343581 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ongolo, Symphorien & Giessen, Lukas & Karsenty, Alain & Tchamba, Martin & Krott, Max, 2021. "Forestland policies and politics in Africa: Recent evidence and new challenges," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Marcela Prokopová & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Ondřej Cudlín & Renata Včeláková & Radek Plch & Pavel Cudlín, 2019. "Envisioning Present and Future Land-Use Change under Varying Ecological Regimes and Their Influence on Landscape Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Cheye, Stephen & Annan, Kenneth & Wang, Tong, 2026. "Adoption Dynamics of Ecological Agriculture Practices: Understanding the Complementarity and Intensity in the US Midwest," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 0(Preprint), June.
    15. James J Elser & Timothy J Elser & Stephen R Carpenter & William A Brock, 2014. "Regime Shift in Fertilizer Commodities Indicates More Turbulence Ahead for Food Security," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    16. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Abdulai, Issaka & Hoffmann, Munir P. & Jassogne, Laurence & Asare, Richard & Graefe, Sophie & Tao, Hsiao-Hang & Muilerman, Sander & Vaast, Philippe & Van Asten, Piet & Läderach, Peter & Rötter, Reimun, 2020. "Variations in yield gaps of smallholder cocoa systems and the main determining factors along a climate gradient in Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Qian Sun & Mingjie Wu & Peiyu Du & Wei Qi & Xinyang Yu, 2022. "Spatial Layout Optimization and Simulation of Cultivated Land Based on the Life Community Theory in a Mountainous and Hilly Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Heider, Katharina & Quaranta, Emanuele & García Avilés, José María & Rodriguez Lopez, Juan Miguel & Balbo, Andrea L. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Reinventing the wheel – The preservation and potential of traditional water wheels in the terraced irrigated landscapes of the Ricote Valley, southeast Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    21. Rockström, Johan & Williams, J. & Daily, G. & Noble, A.D. & Matthews, Nathaniel & Gordon, L. & Wetterstrand, H. & DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. & Shah, M. & Steduto, P. & Fraiture, Charlotte de & Hatibu, N., 2017. "Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.