IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v154y2025ics0264837725001139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservation easement adoption among forest landowners in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Changyou
  • Kline, Jeffry D.
  • Li, Xiaofei

Abstract

Conservation easements have become a prevalent method for conserving forestland in the United States in the face of housing and other development. In this study, we used data from the National Woodland Owner Survey conducted by the USDA Forest Service in 2017–2018 to examine patterns and determinants of conservation easement adoption on individual forestland parcels. A total of 9349 landowners are included in the analysis, covering all 50 states. We used a spatial binary probit model to consider potential spatial dependence in conservation decisions among adjacent landowners. Our results reveal that significant spatial dependence exists, suggesting that about 30 % of the total effect of an explanatory variable on easement adoption comes from an indirect spatial effect. Landowners' degree of awareness of conservation easements has the most significant positive effect. Easement adoption is also higher among landowners possessing non-commodity ownership objectives, such as wildlife protection, while adoption is lower among landowners with primarily timber and investment objectives. Demand for conserving forestland has increased in areas experiencing more remarkable population growth or household income. States adopting statutory conservation easement laws earlier tend to have higher rates of easement adoption. Policy implications of these findings are discussed for conservation entities and government agencies to promote conservation easements in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Changyou & Kline, Jeffry D. & Li, Xiaofei, 2025. "Conservation easement adoption among forest landowners in the United States," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001139
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001139
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.