IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v153y2025ics0264837725000869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicts between ecological and agricultural production functions: The impact of the Grain for Green Program and wildlife damage on cropland abandonment in China’s mountainous areas

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Hengfei
  • Li, Xiubin
  • Xin, Liangjie
  • Dong, Shijie
  • Wang, Xue

Abstract

Cropland abandonment is the process by which farmers cease agricultural production, allowing land to revert to its ecological function. China’s Grain for Green Program (GGP), which aims to improve the ecological environment, and wildlife damage arising from competition for natural habitats influence farmers’ decisions to abandon croplands. However, the research findings on this topic remains both mixed and insufficient. This study develops a theoretical framework from the perspective of the conflict between ecological and agricultural production functions to explain the relationships among the GGP, wildlife damage, and cropland abandonment. Using survey data from 2397 farmers in mountainous areas of China, this study employs multiple models and heterogeneity analysis to estimate the impact of the GGP and wildlife damage on cropland abandonment. The findings reveal that the implementation of the GGP reduces cropland abandonment, whereas wildlife damage has a significant positive effect. This indicates that the financial compensation of the GGP encourages farmers to cease agricultural production, substituting for the voluntary abandonment of cropland. Furthermore, wildlife’s pursuit of habitats results in the seizure of agricultural spaces, leading to reduced agricultural production. Additionally, the GGP can amplify the impact of wildlife damage on cropland abandonment and mitigate the impact of labor migration. Wildlife damage can also influence cropland abandonment by promoting the exit of laborers from agriculture. The GGP more effectively reduces cropland abandonment among farmers with less cropland and higher income. Farmers with less cropland and lower income are more likely to abandon their cropland because of wildlife damage. Thus, to coordinate the development of multiple goals, appropriately planning the GGP, adjusting compensation strategies, and protecting farmers’ agricultural production from wildlife damage are necessary strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Hengfei & Li, Xiubin & Xin, Liangjie & Dong, Shijie & Wang, Xue, 2025. "Conflicts between ecological and agricultural production functions: The impact of the Grain for Green Program and wildlife damage on cropland abandonment in China’s mountainous areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:153:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000869
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000869
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:153:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.