IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v152y2025ics0264837725000341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguity in state-owned land property rights increases transaction costs in China’s transit-oriented development projects

Author

Listed:
  • He, Dongsheng
  • Wang, Jinshuo
  • Sun, Guibo

Abstract

This paper provides compelling evidence that the ambiguity in state-owned land property rights increases transaction costs in China’s transit-oriented development (TOD) projects. The constitution defines the state as the de jure (legally defined) owner of urban land, but tiers of local government share the de facto (practically controlled) land property rights; this ambiguity complicates land use right transfer for TOD. Through expert interviews, document analysis, and case studies in Guangzhou, we identified three critical issues. First, ambiguity in de facto land property rights has led district governments to relocate the metro depot site from a profitable plot suitable for metro scheduling and property development to land plots that are less advantageous and far away from the station. Second, the coexistence of land allocation and leasing approaches under state ownership discouraged an optimised land assembly for the TOD project. Rigid acquisition sizes designated in land allocation for infrastructure discouraged coordination and prolonged negotiations between the district government and the metro company. Finally, the district government faced a disproportionate fiscal responsibility compared to their land leasing share from the municipal government. They are thus passively against the TOD project using their land use planning power. These transaction costs delay the TOD project and jeopardise the outcomes, resulting in depots far from metro stations, housing adjacent to industrial areas, and oversized commercial spaces on urban fringes. We argue that the ambiguity in state-owned land property rights is rooted in China’s historical, cultural, and institutional contexts, driving high transaction costs for urban infrastructure development.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Dongsheng & Wang, Jinshuo & Sun, Guibo, 2025. "Ambiguity in state-owned land property rights increases transaction costs in China’s transit-oriented development projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000341
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000341
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: II. A case study of the redevelopment of a local state-owned enterprise in Nanjing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 372-380.
    2. Oliver E. Williamson, 2025. "Transaction Cost Economics," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edition 0, chapter 4, pages 47-71, Springer.
    3. Hu, Yingjie & Lu, Bin & Wu, Jiayu, 2019. "Value capture in industrial land renewal under the public leasehold system: A policy comparison in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 59-69.
    4. Wang, Jinshuo & Samsura, D. Ary A. & van der Krabben, Erwin, 2019. "Institutional barriers to financing transit-oriented development in China: Analyzing informal land value capture strategies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Sun, Guibo & Du, Yao, 2023. "New metro and subjective wellbeing among older people: A natural experiment in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Jun Chu & De Tong & Yu-Hung Hong & Ian MacLachlan & Xiangxiang Pan, 2024. "Shareholding Land Readjustment Led by Local Government During Peri-Urbanization: The Case of Zhaoqing, China," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 225-243, March.
    7. Sun, Guibo & Wallace, Dugald & Webster, Chris, 2020. "Unravelling the impact of street network structure and gated community layout in development-oriented transit design," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Dongsheng He & Guibo Sun & Ling Li & Chris Webster, 2024. "New metro and housing price and rent premiums: A natural experiment in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1371-1392, May.
    9. Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín Jesus Quiroz Villanueva & Francesco Guglielmi & Francesco De Fabiis & Pierluigi Coppola, 2025. "Social and Economic Impacts of Transportation Multi-Modal and Multi-Service Hub Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Guoxiang Li & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2021. "Construction land reduction, rural financial development, and industrial structure optimization," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1783-1803, September.
    3. Wendong Wu & Fang He & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2020. "Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Min Zhou & Man Yuan & Yaping Huang & Kaixuan Lin, 2021. "Effects of Institutions on Spatial Patterns of Manufacturing Industries and Policy Implications in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Fang He & Yuan Yi & Yuxuan Si, 2024. "Evolution Process of Urban Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: A Perspective of Original Land Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    7. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    8. Schneider, Christian O. & Bremen, Philipp & Schönsleben, Paul & Alard, Robert, 2013. "Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: Assessing regional differences and implications for performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 243-254.
    9. David E. Cantor & Tingting Yan & Mark Pagell & Wendy L. Tate, 2022. "From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 3-7, April.
    10. Yi-Ju Lo & Tung Hung, 2015. "Structure offshoring and returns on offshoring," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 443-479, June.
    11. Stephan Gundel & Achim Hecker, 2006. "Funding and operation of stadiums and arenas beside high-class leagues," Working Papers 0604, International Association of Sports Economists;North American Association of Sports Economists.
    12. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    13. Jackie Krafft, 2006. "Business history and the organization of industry," Post-Print hal-00211780, HAL.
    14. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    15. Åke E. Andersson & Börje Johansson, 2018. "Inside and outside the black box: organization of interdependencies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(3), pages 501-516, November.
    16. Martino, Gaetano & Frascarelli, Angelo, 2014. "Adaptation in Food Networks: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidences," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(01), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Burger Ronelle & Owens Trudy & Prakash Aseem, 2018. "Global Non-Profit Chains and the Challenges of Development Aid Contracting," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Peter Nemec, 2024. "Contesting the public works domain: examining the factors affecting presence and success of SMES in public procurement," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(5), pages 2135-2173, November.
    19. Goknur Arzu Akyuz & Guner Gursoy, 2020. "Strategic management perspectives on supply chain," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 213-241, May.
    20. Veugelers, Reinhilde, 1997. "Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 303-315, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.