IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v82y2023ics030142072300154x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the international co-opetition dynamics of rare earth resources between China, USA, Japan and the EU: An ecological niche approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai, Jing
  • Zhao, Yujia
  • Shuai, Chuanmin
  • Wang, Jingjin
  • Yi, Tian
  • Cheng, Jinhua

Abstract

As one of the basic raw materials for the development of strategic emerging industries, rare earth resources (RERs) are regarded as strategic critical minerals by many countries such as China, the USA, Japan and the EU. In recent years, rare earth resources have become the focus of world great power competition. However, a dynamic evolutionary trend of the co-opetition relationships between the global major economies competing for rare earth resources is still unknown in the existing literature. To this end, in this study we constructed a dynamic index system for assessing the rare earth (RE) resource co-opetition relationships between the world major countries in five dimensions, i.e., endowment of resources, scale of economy, infrastructure, trade market and technological innovation, and revealed the dynamic evolutionary trends of the co-opetition relationships between China, USA, Japan and the EU by adopting the ecological niche models using a panel dataset from 2008 to 2021. The results indicate that: (1) China, the USA, Japan and the EU have significant differences in the overall competitive advantages of rare earth resources, China's competitive advantage is obvious, followed by USA and Japan, while the EU is the weakest; (2) Among the four major economies, the competition for rare earth resources between the USA, Japan and the EU has always been fierce. The degrees of competition between China and the other three major economies are different. The most fierce competition with China is the USA, followed by Japan, and China's competition with the two countries is increasing. The competition between China and the EU is the weakest; (3) The most advantageous dimensions in the ecological niche of rare earth resources in these four countries vary greatly. Finally, we proposed corresponding policy recommendations based on these conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai, Jing & Zhao, Yujia & Shuai, Chuanmin & Wang, Jingjin & Yi, Tian & Cheng, Jinhua, 2023. "Assessing the international co-opetition dynamics of rare earth resources between China, USA, Japan and the EU: An ecological niche approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:82:y:2023:i:c:s030142072300154x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072300154X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuai, Jing & Peng, Xinjie & Zhao, Yujia & Wang, Yilan & Xu, Wei & Cheng, Jinhua & Lu, Yang & Wang, Jingjin, 2022. "A dynamic evaluation on the international competitiveness of China's rare earth products: An industrial chain and tech-innovation perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Gao, Cuixia & Tao, Simin & Su, Bin & Mensah, Isaac Adjei & Sun, Mei, 2023. "Exploring renewable energy trade coopetition relationships: Evidence from belt and road countries, 1996-2018," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 196-209.
    3. Hou, Wenyu & Liu, Huifang & Wang, Hui & Wu, Fengyang, 2018. "Structure and patterns of the international rare earths trade: A complex network analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 133-142.
    4. Hommels, Anique & Peters, Peter & Bijker, Wiebe E., 2007. "Techno therapy or nurtured niches? Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1088-1099, September.
    5. Seol, Hyeonju & Park, Gwangman & Lee, Hakyeon & Yoon, Byungun, 2012. "Demand forecasting for new media services with consideration of competitive relationships using the competitive Bass model and the theory of the niche," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(7), pages 1217-1228.
    6. Zhao, Yujia & Shuai, Jing & Shi, Yin & Lu, Yang & Zhang, Zumeng, 2022. "Exploring the co-opetition mechanism of renewable energy trade between China and the “Belt and Road” countries: A dynamic game approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 998-1008.
    7. Lingjun Wang & Ying Wang & Jian Chen, 2019. "Assessment of the Ecological Niche of Photovoltaic Agriculture in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Jing, Zhaorui & Wang, Jinman & Tang, Qian & Liu, Biao & Niu, Hebin, 2021. "Evolution of land use in coal-based cities based on the ecological niche theory: A case study in Shuozhou City, China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Zheng-Zheng & Meng, Qin & Zhang, Linling & Lobont, Oana-Ramona & Shen, Yijuan, 2023. "How do rare earth prices respond to economic and geopolitical factors?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingjun Wang & Yuanyuan Li, 2022. "Research on Niche Improvement Path of Photovoltaic Agriculture in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Xia, Qifan & Du, Debin & Cao, Wanpeng & Li, Xiya, 2023. "Who is the core? Reveal the heterogeneity of global rare earth trade structure from the perspective of industrial chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Lingjun Wang & Ying Wang & Jian Chen, 2019. "Assessment of the Ecological Niche of Photovoltaic Agriculture in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Zuo, Zhili & McLellan, Benjamin Craig & Li, Yonglin & Guo, Haixiang & Cheng, Jinhua, 2022. "Evolution and insights into the network and pattern of the rare earths trade from an industry chain perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Tamat Sarmidi & Norlin Khalid & Muhamad Rias K. V. Zainuddin & Sufian Jusoh, 2021. "The COVID-19 Pandemic, Air Transport Perturbation, and Sector Impacts in ASEAN Plus Five: A Multiregional Input–Output Inoperability Analysis," Working Papers DP-2021-01, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    6. Cai, Xiaomei & Liu, Chan & Zheng, Shuxian & Hu, Han & Tan, Zhanglu, 2023. "Analysis on the evolution characteristics of barite international trade pattern based on complex networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Najmeh Madadi & Azanizawati Ma’aram & Kuan Yew Wong, 2017. "A simulation-based product diffusion forecasting method using geometric Brownian motion and spline interpolation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1300992-130, January.
    9. Xu Chen & Yingliang Wu & Rujie Zhong, 2021. "Research on Competitiveness of China’s Social Commerce Enterprises Based on Macro- and Micro-Niche," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Kristoffer Palage & Robert Lundmark & Patrik Söderholm, 2019. "The innovation effects of renewable energy policies and their interaction: the case of solar photovoltaics," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(2), pages 217-254, April.
    11. Smith, Adrian & Voß, Jan-Peter & Grin, John, 2010. "Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 435-448, May.
    12. Monstadt, Jochen & Wolff, Annika, 2015. "Energy transition or incremental change? Green policy agendas and the adaptability of the urban energy regime in Los Angeles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 213-224.
    13. Bo Wang & Yu Liu & Qinghong Sheng & Jun Li & Jiahui Tao & Zhijun Yan, 2022. "Rice Phenology Retrieval Based on Growth Curve Simulation and Multi-Temporal Sentinel-1 Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Xi, Xian & Zhou, Jinsheng & Gao, Xiangyun & Liu, Donghui & Zheng, Huiling & Sun, Qingru, 2019. "Impact of changes in crude oil trade network patterns on national economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Di, Jinghan & Wen, Zongguo & Jiang, Meihui & Miatto, Alessio, 2022. "Patterns and features of embodied environmental flow networks in the international trade of metal resources: A study of aluminum," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Ballet, Jérôme & Bazin, Damien Jérôme Albert & Komena, Boniface K., 2020. "Unequal capabilities and natural resource management: The case of Côte d’Ivoire," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Honorata Nyga-Łukaszewska & Tomasz M. Napiórkowski, 2022. "Does Energy Demand Security Affect International Competitiveness? Case of Selected Energy-Exporting OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Zhang, Hui-min & Feng, Tian-tian & Yang, Yi-sheng, 2022. "Influencing factors and critical path of inter-sector embodied heavy rare earth consumption in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Joseph Murphy & Adrian Smith, 2013. "Understanding Transition—Periphery Dynamics: Renewable Energy in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(3), pages 691-709, March.
    20. Lee, Hakyeon & Kim, Sang Gook & Park, Hyun-woo & Kang, Pilsung, 2014. "Pre-launch new product demand forecasting using the Bass model: A statistical and machine learning-based approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 49-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:82:y:2023:i:c:s030142072300154x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.