IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v104y2025ics0301420725001369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of socio-environmental solutions in the mining industry in comparison to other industries: A data-driven unveiling perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Sorooshian, Shahryar

Abstract

Through a data-driven approach, this research aims to uncover perceptions related to the industry's role in sustainable development. Correspondingly, this study explores socio-economic and environmental solutions within the mining industry and compares them to other industries. The analysis relies on archived data from the Thomson Reuters Asset4 (Asset4) database to examine and compare these perceptions across various industries. Utilizing a multiple criteria comparison, with the mean of analytical geometry concept, the collected database information offers insights into stakeholder perspectives. By contrasting the mining industry with nine other sectors including Banking, Automotive, and Construction, common patterns and discrepancies in perceptions are compared. From the analysis, the mining industry ranks lowest in socio-environmental performance compared to other sectors. The research findings enhanced our understanding of the mining industry's socio-environmental impacts and its potential for sustainable solutions. By addressing perceptions surrounding the mining industry, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on sustainable practices and responsible resource extraction. Bridging the gap between industry practices and societal expectations, it facilitates evidence-based policies for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorooshian, Shahryar, 2025. "Exploration of socio-environmental solutions in the mining industry in comparison to other industries: A data-driven unveiling perceptions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725001369
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001369
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s0301420725001369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.