IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v37y2009i5p1018-1026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EOQ model for imperfective items under a one-time-only discount

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Hsu, Wen-Kai
  • Yu, Hong-Fwu

Abstract

In practice, when a supplier is confronted with extreme completion in markets, unanticipated surplus in inventory, or change in the production run of a product, he/she may offer a special price discount to motivate buyers to order a special quantity. The purpose of the present paper is to investigate an inventory model for imperfective items under a one-time-only discount, where the defectives can be screened out by a 100% screening process and then can be sold in a single batch by the end of the 100% screening process. The optimal order policies associated with three kinds of effective times of the reduced price are obtained. Finally, a numerical example is provided to illustrate the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Hsu, Wen-Kai & Yu, Hong-Fwu, 2009. "EOQ model for imperfective items under a one-time-only discount," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1018-1026, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:37:y:2009:i:5:p:1018-1026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(08)00136-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eroglu, Abdullah & Ozdemir, Gultekin, 2007. "An economic order quantity model with defective items and shortages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 544-549, April.
    2. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    3. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    4. Pentico, David W. & Drake, Matthew J. & Toews, Carl, 2009. "The deterministic EPQ with partial backordering: A new approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 624-636, June.
    5. Goyal, S. K. & Srinivasan, G. & Arcelus, F. J., 1991. "One time only incentives and inventory policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-6, September.
    6. Erel, E, 1992. "The effect of continuous price change in the EOQ," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 523-527, July.
    7. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Cardenas-Barron, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2002. "Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality - a practical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 85-87, May.
    8. Li, Jian & Wang, Shouyang & Cheng, T.C. Edwin, 2008. "Analysis of postponement strategy by EPQ-based models with planned backorders," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 777-788, October.
    9. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Al Kindi, Mahmood, 2006. "Optimal ordering policies in response to a discount offer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 195-211, April.
    10. Percy H. Brill & Ben A. Chaouch, 1995. "An EOQ Model with Random Variations in Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 927-936, May.
    11. Wee, H.M. & Yu, Jonas & Chen, M.C., 2007. "Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-11, February.
    12. Goyal, S. K., 1990. "Economic ordering policy during special discount periods for dynamic inventory problems under certainty," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 101-104, July.
    13. Dye, Chung-Yuan, 2007. "Joint pricing and ordering policy for a deteriorating inventory with partial backlogging," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 184-189, April.
    14. Khouja, Moutaz & Park, Sungjune, 2003. "Optimal lot sizing under continuous price decrease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 539-545, December.
    15. Sana, Shib Sankar & Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2007. "An imperfect production process in a volume flexible inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 548-559, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiju Wang & Hengxia Gao & Wei Xing, 2018. "Optimal replenishment and stocking strategies for inventory mechanism with a dynamically stochastic short-term price discount," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 27-53, January.
    2. S. Nodoust & A. Mirzazadeh & G.-W. Weber, 2020. "An evidential reasoning approach for production modeling with deteriorating and ameliorating items," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    4. Rezaei, Jafar & Salimi, Negin, 2012. "Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 11-18.
    5. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Hadi Samimi & Babak Mohammadi, 2015. "Joint replenishment policy with backordering and special sale," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 1172-1198, May.
    6. Hsieh, Ying-Jiun, 2011. "Demand switching criteria for multiple products: An inventory cost analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 130-137, April.
    7. Mahdi Tajbakhsh, M. & Lee, Chi-Guhn & Zolfaghari, Saeed, 2011. "An inventory model with random discount offerings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 710-718, December.
    8. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Mohammadi, Babak & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo & Samimi, Hadi, 2013. "An EOQ model for perishable product with special sale and shortage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 318-338.
    9. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    10. Tang, Shao-Long & Yan, Hong, 2010. "Pre-distribution vs. post-distribution for cross-docking with transshipments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 192-202, June.
    11. Xie, Yue & Tai, Allen H. & Ching, Wai-Ki & Siu, Tak-Kuen, 2016. "Pricing strategy for a two-echelon supply chain with optimized return effort level," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 185-195.
    12. Chang, Hung-Chi & Ho, Chia-Huei, 2010. "Exact closed-form solutions for "optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering"," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 233-237, June.
    13. Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Vörös, József, 2015. "Lot sizing in case of defective items with investments to increase the speed of quality control," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 180-189.
    14. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Shaposhnik, Yaron & Herer, Yale T. & Naseraldin, Hussein, 2015. "Optimal ordering for a probabilistic one-time discount," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 803-814.
    16. Yang, P.C. & Wee, H.M. & Liu, B.S. & Fong, O.K., 2011. "Mitigating Hi-tech products risks due to rapid technological innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 456-463, August.
    17. Hsun Chuan Cho & Ying Jiun Hsieh & Lan Ying Huang, 2018. "Capturing the Risk-Pooling Effect through Inventory Planning and Demand Switching," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(11), pages 1-1, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:37:y:2009:i:5:p:1018-1026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.