IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v137y2012i1p11-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier

Author

Listed:
  • Rezaei, Jafar
  • Salimi, Negin

Abstract

Traditional Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) models, implicitly assume that all items that are received are perfect. Although recent EOQ models for items with imperfect quality, which relax this assumption, are closer to real-world problems, they implicitly assume that suppliers do not conduct a full inspection. In this paper, we study the relationship between buyer and supplier with regard to conducting the inspection and resulting in a change the buyer’s economic order quantity and purchasing price. We model and analyze the problem under two conditions: (1) assuming there is no relationship between the buyer’s selling price, buyer’s purchasing price, and customer demand; (2) assuming there is relationship between the buyer’s selling price, buyer’s purchasing price, and customer demand. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the models.

Suggested Citation

  • Rezaei, Jafar & Salimi, Negin, 2012. "Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 11-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:137:y:2012:i:1:p:11-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312000060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    2. Huang, Chao-Kuei, 2004. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem with process unreliability consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 91-98, September.
    3. Maddah, Bacel & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2008. "Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 808-815, April.
    4. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    5. Kevin Hsu, Wen-Kai & Yu, Hong-Fwu, 2009. "EOQ model for imperfective items under a one-time-only discount," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1018-1026, October.
    6. Abad, P. L., 2003. "Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of perishability, finite production and partial backordering and lost sale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 677-685, February.
    7. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2005. "Integrated production and product inspection policy for a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 123-134, January.
    8. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2010. "Coordination between vendor and buyer considering trade credit and items of imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 52-61, January.
    9. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Cardenas-Barron, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2002. "Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality - a practical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 85-87, May.
    10. Khouja, Moutaz, 2006. "A joint optimal pricing, rebate value, and lot sizing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 706-723, October.
    11. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2007. "Integrated vendor-buyer cooperative inventory models with variant permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 658-673, December.
    12. Chang, Hung-Chi & Ho, Chia-Huei, 2010. "Exact closed-form solutions for "optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering"," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 233-237, June.
    13. Wee, H.M. & Yu, Jonas & Chen, M.C., 2007. "Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-11, February.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar & Davoodi, Mansoor, 2011. "Multi-objective models for lot-sizing with supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 77-86, March.
    15. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    16. Kun-Jen Chung & Yung-Fu Huang, 2006. "Retailer’s Optimal Cycle Times in the EOQ Model with Imperfect Quality and a Permissible Credit Period," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 59-77, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Hung-Chi, 2013. "An economic production quantity model with consolidating shipments of imperfect quality items: A note," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 507-509.
    2. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Khanbaglo, Mahboobeh Perak Sari & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2016. "An EOQ inventory model with partial backordering and reparation of imperfect products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 418-434.
    3. Rezaei, Jafar, 2014. "Economic order quantity for growing items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 109-113.
    4. Pal, Brojeswar & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2014. "Joint pricing and ordering policy for two echelon imperfect production inventory model with two cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 229-238.
    5. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone & Zavanella, Lucio E., 2014. "Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 126-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:137:y:2012:i:1:p:11-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.