IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v10y2019i3d10.1007_s13198-019-00792-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Darma Wangsa

    (Chung Yuan Christian University)

  • Hui Ming Wee

    (Chung Yuan Christian University)

  • Shih-Hsien Tseng

    (Chung Yuan Christian University)

Abstract

The loss and damage of goods during shipment is a very common risk that business owners often incur as a part of daily operations. For this reason, the shipper may have to make a claim for lost or damaged items. In this study, a claim policy to improve the flow and coordination of the vendor–buyer inventory shipment process is developed. The model assumes some of the goods are lost or damaged during production and shipment. The buyer incurs an insurance cost which corresponds the market value of the item. The stochastic lead time is a function of production, transportation, in-transit and delay times. The objective of the coordinated vendor–buyer model is to minimize the total cost for both parties. An algorithm to optimize the independent and coordinated policies is created. Finally, numerical examples and sensitivity analysis are given to illustrate the theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00792-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-019-00792-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-019-00792-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-019-00792-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eroglu, Abdullah & Ozdemir, Gultekin, 2007. "An economic order quantity model with defective items and shortages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 544-549, April.
    2. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila, 2016. "Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 263-271.
    3. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    4. Daryanto, Yosef & Wee, Hui Ming & Astanti, Ririn Diar, 2019. "Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 368-383.
    5. Huang, Chao-Kuei, 2004. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem with process unreliability consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 91-98, September.
    6. Maddah, Bacel & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2008. "Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 808-815, April.
    7. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    8. Swenseth, Scott R. & Godfrey, Michael R., 2002. "Incorporating transportation costs into inventory replenishment decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 113-130, May.
    9. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    10. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2005. "Integrated production and product inspection policy for a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 123-134, January.
    11. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    12. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Cardenas-Barron, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2002. "Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality - a practical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 85-87, May.
    13. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    14. Chen, Cheng-Kang & Lo, Chih-Chung & Weng, Tzu-Chun, 2017. "Optimal production run length and warranty period for an imperfect production system under selling price dependent on warranty period," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 401-412.
    15. Wakhid Ahmad Jauhari, 2016. "Integrated vendor-buyer model with defective items, inspection error and stochastic demand," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 342-359.
    16. Wee, H.M. & Yu, Jonas & Chen, M.C., 2007. "Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-11, February.
    17. Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Biswajit Sarkar & Baishakhi Ganguly & Asif Iqbal Malik & Rafael Batista & Young Hae Lee, 2018. "Optimization of sample size and order size in an inventory model with quality inspection and return of defective items," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 445-467, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    2. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Lie-Fern Hsu & Jia-Tzer Hsu, 2016. "Economic production quantity (EPQ) models under an imperfect production process with shortages backordered," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 852-867, March.
    4. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    5. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Khanbaglo, Mahboobeh Perak Sari & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2016. "An EOQ inventory model with partial backordering and reparation of imperfect products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 418-434.
    6. Rezaei, Jafar & Salimi, Negin, 2012. "Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 11-18.
    7. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    8. Mehmood Khan & Matloub Hussain & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2017. "Learning and screening errors in an EPQ inventory model for supply chains with stochastic lead time demands," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4816-4832, August.
    9. Aditi Khanna & Aakanksha Kishore & Biswajit Sarkar & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2018. "Supply Chain with Customer-Based Two-Level Credit Policies under an Imperfect Quality Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-35, December.
    10. Skouri, K. & Konstantaras, I. & Lagodimos, A.G. & Papachristos, S., 2014. "An EOQ model with backorders and rejection of defective supply batches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 148-154.
    11. Chang, Hung-Chi & Ho, Chia-Huei, 2010. "Exact closed-form solutions for "optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering"," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 233-237, June.
    12. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Inventory system with defective products and investment opportunity for reducing defective proportion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 297-312, April.
    13. Kevin Hsu, Wen-Kai & Yu, Hong-Fwu, 2009. "EOQ model for imperfective items under a one-time-only discount," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1018-1026, October.
    14. Yassine, Ali & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen, 2012. "Disaggregation and consolidation of imperfect quality shipments in an extended EPQ model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 345-352.
    15. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    16. Nasr, Walid W. & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen K., 2013. "EOQ with a correlated binomial supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 248-255.
    17. Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & María José Lea Plaza-Makowsky & María Alejandra Sevilla-Roca & José María Núñez-Baumert & Buddhadev Mandal, 2021. "An Inventory Model for Imperfect Quality Products with Rework, Distinct Holding Costs, and Nonlinear Demand Dependent on Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Biswajit Sarkar & Baishakhi Ganguly & Asif Iqbal Malik & Rafael Batista & Young Hae Lee, 2018. "Optimization of sample size and order size in an inventory model with quality inspection and return of defective items," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 445-467, December.
    19. Maddah, Bacel & Moussawi, Lama & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2010. "Lot sizing with a Markov production process and imperfect items scrapped," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 340-347, April.
    20. Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Vörös, József, 2015. "Lot sizing in case of defective items with investments to increase the speed of quality control," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 180-189.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00792-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.