IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joepsy/v108y2025ics0167487025000169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do managers accept artificial intelligence? Insights into the role of business area and AI functionality

Author

Listed:
  • Gieselmann, Miriam
  • Erdsiek, Daniel
  • Rost, Vincent
  • Sassenberg, Kai

Abstract

More and more companies use artificial intelligence (AI). Research aimed to understand acceptance from the perspective of AI users or people affected by AI decisions. However, the perspective of decision-makers in companies (i.e., managers) has not been considered. To address this gap, we investigate managers’ acceptance of AI usage in companies, focusing on two potential determinants. Across four experimental studies (Ntotal = 2025), we tested whether the business area (i.e., human resources vs. finances/ marketing) and AI functionality affect managers’ acceptance of AI (i.e., perceived risk of negative consequences, willingness to invest). Findings indicate that managers (a) perceive more risk of and (b) are less willing to invest in AI usage in human resources than in finances and marketing. Besides, the results suggest that acceptance declines if functionality crosses a critical boundary and AI autonomously implements decisions without prior human control. Accordingly, the current research sheds light on the AI acceptance of managers and gives insights into the role of the business area and AI functionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Gieselmann, Miriam & Erdsiek, Daniel & Rost, Vincent & Sassenberg, Kai, 2025. "Do managers accept artificial intelligence? Insights into the role of business area and AI functionality," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0167487025000169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487025000169
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joep.2025.102804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0167487025000169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.